Elise L Ruan, Abdulaziz Alkattan, Noemie Elhadad, Sarah Collins Rossetti
{"title":"临床医生对生成式人工智能工具和临床工作流程的看法:潜在用途、采用动机和对影响的看法","authors":"Elise L Ruan, Abdulaziz Alkattan, Noemie Elhadad, Sarah Collins Rossetti","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.29.24311177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Successful integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare requires understanding of health\nprofessionals perspectives, ideally through data-driven approaches. In this study, we use a semi-structured survey\nand mixed methods analyses to explore clinicians perceptions on the utility of generative AI for all types of clinical\ntasks, familiarity and competency with generative AI tools, and sentiments regarding the potential impact of\ngenerative AI on healthcare. Analysis of 116 clinician responses found differing perceptions regarding the usefulness\nof generative AI across clinical workflows, with information gathering from external sources rated highest and\ncommunication rated lowest. Clinician-generated prompt suggestions focused most often on clinician decision making\nand were of mixed quality, with participants more familiar with generative AI suggesting more high-quality prompts.\nSentiments regarding the impact of generative AI varied, particularly regarding trustworthiness and impact on bias.\nThematic analysis of open-ended comments highlighted concerns about patient care and the role of clinicians.","PeriodicalId":501454,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools and Clinical Workflows: Potential Uses, Motivations for Adoption, and Sentiments on Impact\",\"authors\":\"Elise L Ruan, Abdulaziz Alkattan, Noemie Elhadad, Sarah Collins Rossetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.29.24311177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Successful integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare requires understanding of health\\nprofessionals perspectives, ideally through data-driven approaches. In this study, we use a semi-structured survey\\nand mixed methods analyses to explore clinicians perceptions on the utility of generative AI for all types of clinical\\ntasks, familiarity and competency with generative AI tools, and sentiments regarding the potential impact of\\ngenerative AI on healthcare. Analysis of 116 clinician responses found differing perceptions regarding the usefulness\\nof generative AI across clinical workflows, with information gathering from external sources rated highest and\\ncommunication rated lowest. Clinician-generated prompt suggestions focused most often on clinician decision making\\nand were of mixed quality, with participants more familiar with generative AI suggesting more high-quality prompts.\\nSentiments regarding the impact of generative AI varied, particularly regarding trustworthiness and impact on bias.\\nThematic analysis of open-ended comments highlighted concerns about patient care and the role of clinicians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Informatics\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.29.24311177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.29.24311177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinician Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools and Clinical Workflows: Potential Uses, Motivations for Adoption, and Sentiments on Impact
Successful integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare requires understanding of health
professionals perspectives, ideally through data-driven approaches. In this study, we use a semi-structured survey
and mixed methods analyses to explore clinicians perceptions on the utility of generative AI for all types of clinical
tasks, familiarity and competency with generative AI tools, and sentiments regarding the potential impact of
generative AI on healthcare. Analysis of 116 clinician responses found differing perceptions regarding the usefulness
of generative AI across clinical workflows, with information gathering from external sources rated highest and
communication rated lowest. Clinician-generated prompt suggestions focused most often on clinician decision making
and were of mixed quality, with participants more familiar with generative AI suggesting more high-quality prompts.
Sentiments regarding the impact of generative AI varied, particularly regarding trustworthiness and impact on bias.
Thematic analysis of open-ended comments highlighted concerns about patient care and the role of clinicians.