跨境涟漪:利用事件研究法调查贸易伙伴国股市对以色列-哈马斯冲突的反应

IF 1.9 Q2 ECONOMICS JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1108/jes-05-2024-0291
Anindita Bhattacharjee, Neeru Sidana, Richa Goel, Anagha Shukre, Tilottama Singh
{"title":"跨境涟漪:利用事件研究法调查贸易伙伴国股市对以色列-哈马斯冲突的反应","authors":"Anindita Bhattacharjee, Neeru Sidana, Richa Goel, Anagha Shukre, Tilottama Singh","doi":"10.1108/jes-05-2024-0291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The study will add to the current discourse on the Israel-Hamas conflict by examining the impact of the war on the stock markets of trading partners. Stock market returns inevitably rise as globalization keeps integrating financial markets and economies around the world. Thus, the impact of war is assessed across a range of indicators that are similar in some way, such as geographic location, political climate or economic standing. Thus, the goal of this study is to investigate how the Israel-Hamas war affects trading partner countries' stock performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Event study methodology is applied using Morgan Stanley Capital Index (MSCI) as a benchmark index. The influence of the Israel-Hamas war on the world's major stock markets is evaluated using a market model. The study takes into account Israel and its 23 trading partners. To capture the locational asymmetry in the outcome, the countries are further categorized according to their geographic locations. The official declaration of war came on October 7, 2023, a non-trading day. Consequently, October 9, 2023, is designated as the event day in this study. The data was gathered between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023, with an estimation period of 140 days taken into account to minimize bias.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Asymmetric response is shown among the nations due to their economic standing, geographic proximity and trading links with Israel. While Austria, Greece, Egypt, Palestine and Israel had the greatest negative effects, Argentina, Japan and Chile saw significant beneficial effects. The remaining nations had little effect. The market quickly adjusted itself, eliminating anomalous returns.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>Taking into account the topic's criticality, the current work has certain limits. The study has used the daily data to limit its reach to the stock market exclusively. In the future, academics can combine high-frequency stock market data with data from other macroeconomic variables, such as currency or different commodities markets, to further their research. Furthermore, a cross-national comparison of the impact in terms of direction and intensity regarding developing global groups such as I2U2, LEVANT, BRICS, MIKTA, SCO, NATO, SAARC and OECD can provide a more comprehensive understanding in this context. To gain insight into the durability and adaptation of financial systems over time, longitudinal studies could be conducted to monitor the long-term effects of geopolitical crises on the stock markets of trading partner countries.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>By better managing investment portfolios and evaluating potential risks associated with trading partners involved in such conflicts, investors and businesses can lessen the impact of geopolitical tensions on stock market performance. These results contribute to our understanding of how geopolitical conflicts affect stock markets.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research provides an extensive analysis of the global impact of Israel-Hamas tensions on stock market volatility by taking into account trading partners. This allows for the investigation of how various market structures and economic systems react to geopolitical turmoil. The present study is one of the first attempts to look into how disturbances in one region might affect continents to better understand the dynamics of global trade and economic interdependencies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47604,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-border ripples: investigating stock market responses to Israel-Hamas conflict in trading partner nations using event study method\",\"authors\":\"Anindita Bhattacharjee, Neeru Sidana, Richa Goel, Anagha Shukre, Tilottama Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jes-05-2024-0291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The study will add to the current discourse on the Israel-Hamas conflict by examining the impact of the war on the stock markets of trading partners. Stock market returns inevitably rise as globalization keeps integrating financial markets and economies around the world. Thus, the impact of war is assessed across a range of indicators that are similar in some way, such as geographic location, political climate or economic standing. Thus, the goal of this study is to investigate how the Israel-Hamas war affects trading partner countries' stock performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Event study methodology is applied using Morgan Stanley Capital Index (MSCI) as a benchmark index. The influence of the Israel-Hamas war on the world's major stock markets is evaluated using a market model. The study takes into account Israel and its 23 trading partners. To capture the locational asymmetry in the outcome, the countries are further categorized according to their geographic locations. The official declaration of war came on October 7, 2023, a non-trading day. Consequently, October 9, 2023, is designated as the event day in this study. The data was gathered between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023, with an estimation period of 140 days taken into account to minimize bias.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Asymmetric response is shown among the nations due to their economic standing, geographic proximity and trading links with Israel. While Austria, Greece, Egypt, Palestine and Israel had the greatest negative effects, Argentina, Japan and Chile saw significant beneficial effects. The remaining nations had little effect. The market quickly adjusted itself, eliminating anomalous returns.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>Taking into account the topic's criticality, the current work has certain limits. The study has used the daily data to limit its reach to the stock market exclusively. In the future, academics can combine high-frequency stock market data with data from other macroeconomic variables, such as currency or different commodities markets, to further their research. Furthermore, a cross-national comparison of the impact in terms of direction and intensity regarding developing global groups such as I2U2, LEVANT, BRICS, MIKTA, SCO, NATO, SAARC and OECD can provide a more comprehensive understanding in this context. To gain insight into the durability and adaptation of financial systems over time, longitudinal studies could be conducted to monitor the long-term effects of geopolitical crises on the stock markets of trading partner countries.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>By better managing investment portfolios and evaluating potential risks associated with trading partners involved in such conflicts, investors and businesses can lessen the impact of geopolitical tensions on stock market performance. These results contribute to our understanding of how geopolitical conflicts affect stock markets.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This research provides an extensive analysis of the global impact of Israel-Hamas tensions on stock market volatility by taking into account trading partners. This allows for the investigation of how various market structures and economic systems react to geopolitical turmoil. The present study is one of the first attempts to look into how disturbances in one region might affect continents to better understand the dynamics of global trade and economic interdependencies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-05-2024-0291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-05-2024-0291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究将通过考察战争对贸易伙伴国股票市场的影响,为当前有关以色列-哈马斯冲突的讨论添砖加瓦。随着全球化不断整合全球金融市场和经济,股市回报率不可避免地会上升。因此,战争的影响要通过一系列在某些方面相似的指标来评估,如地理位置、政治气候或经济地位。因此,本研究的目标是调查以色列-哈马斯战争如何影响贸易伙伴国的股票表现。设计/方法/途径以摩根士丹利资本指数(MSCI)为基准指数,采用事件研究法。使用市场模型评估以色列-哈马斯战争对世界主要股票市场的影响。研究考虑了以色列及其 23 个贸易伙伴。为捕捉结果中的地区不对称性,根据各国的地理位置对其进行了进一步分类。正式宣战是在 2023 年 10 月 7 日,一个非交易日。因此,本研究将 2023 年 10 月 9 日定为事件日。数据收集时间为 2023 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日,为尽量减少偏差,估计期为 140 天。研究结果由于各国的经济地位、地理位置接近程度以及与以色列的贸易联系,各国的反应不对称。奥地利、希腊、埃及、巴勒斯坦和以色列受到的负面影响最大,而阿根廷、日本和智利则受到显著的有利影响。其余国家则影响甚微。市场很快进行了自我调整,消除了异常回报。研究使用的是每日数据,因此研究范围仅限于股票市场。今后,学者们可以将股票市场的高频数据与货币或不同商品市场等其他宏观经济变量的数据结合起来,进一步开展研究。此外,对 I2U2、LEVANT、BRICS、MIKTA、SCO、NATO、SAARC 和 OECD 等发展中全球集团的影响方向和强度进行跨国比较,可以更全面地了解这方面的情况。通过更好地管理投资组合和评估与卷入此类冲突的贸易伙伴相关的潜在风险,投资者和企业可以减少地缘政治紧张局势对股市表现的影响。这些结果有助于我们理解地缘政治冲突如何影响股市。原创性/价值本研究通过考虑贸易伙伴,对以色列-哈马斯紧张局势对股市波动的全球影响进行了广泛分析。这有助于研究各种市场结构和经济体系如何对地缘政治动荡做出反应。本研究是首次尝试研究一个地区的动荡如何影响各大洲,从而更好地了解全球贸易和经济相互依存的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cross-border ripples: investigating stock market responses to Israel-Hamas conflict in trading partner nations using event study method

Purpose

The study will add to the current discourse on the Israel-Hamas conflict by examining the impact of the war on the stock markets of trading partners. Stock market returns inevitably rise as globalization keeps integrating financial markets and economies around the world. Thus, the impact of war is assessed across a range of indicators that are similar in some way, such as geographic location, political climate or economic standing. Thus, the goal of this study is to investigate how the Israel-Hamas war affects trading partner countries' stock performance.

Design/methodology/approach

Event study methodology is applied using Morgan Stanley Capital Index (MSCI) as a benchmark index. The influence of the Israel-Hamas war on the world's major stock markets is evaluated using a market model. The study takes into account Israel and its 23 trading partners. To capture the locational asymmetry in the outcome, the countries are further categorized according to their geographic locations. The official declaration of war came on October 7, 2023, a non-trading day. Consequently, October 9, 2023, is designated as the event day in this study. The data was gathered between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023, with an estimation period of 140 days taken into account to minimize bias.

Findings

Asymmetric response is shown among the nations due to their economic standing, geographic proximity and trading links with Israel. While Austria, Greece, Egypt, Palestine and Israel had the greatest negative effects, Argentina, Japan and Chile saw significant beneficial effects. The remaining nations had little effect. The market quickly adjusted itself, eliminating anomalous returns.

Research limitations/implications

Taking into account the topic's criticality, the current work has certain limits. The study has used the daily data to limit its reach to the stock market exclusively. In the future, academics can combine high-frequency stock market data with data from other macroeconomic variables, such as currency or different commodities markets, to further their research. Furthermore, a cross-national comparison of the impact in terms of direction and intensity regarding developing global groups such as I2U2, LEVANT, BRICS, MIKTA, SCO, NATO, SAARC and OECD can provide a more comprehensive understanding in this context. To gain insight into the durability and adaptation of financial systems over time, longitudinal studies could be conducted to monitor the long-term effects of geopolitical crises on the stock markets of trading partner countries.

Practical implications

By better managing investment portfolios and evaluating potential risks associated with trading partners involved in such conflicts, investors and businesses can lessen the impact of geopolitical tensions on stock market performance. These results contribute to our understanding of how geopolitical conflicts affect stock markets.

Originality/value

This research provides an extensive analysis of the global impact of Israel-Hamas tensions on stock market volatility by taking into account trading partners. This allows for the investigation of how various market structures and economic systems react to geopolitical turmoil. The present study is one of the first attempts to look into how disturbances in one region might affect continents to better understand the dynamics of global trade and economic interdependencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Studies publishes high quality research findings and commentary on international developments in economics. The journal maintains a sound balance between economic theory and application at both the micro and the macro levels. Articles on economic issues between individual nations, emerging and evolving trading blocs are particularly welcomed. Contributors are encouraged to spell out the practical implications of their work for economists in government and industry
期刊最新文献
The impact of COVID on the rate of return to schooling among US industries Analyzing the ICT and economic growth relation in OECD countries Students’ performance and faculty efficiency. Assessing the role of gender through a metafrontier An empirical analysis of climate transition: a global outlook of agriculture productivity Is monopoly truly effective for producers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1