{"title":"通过对话式员工沟通打破员工沉默:心理安全和心理授权的中介作用","authors":"Bitt Moon, Minjeong Kang","doi":"10.1177/08933189241268866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Employee silence, as a distinct behavior that differs from employee voice, might cause serious communication problems in organizational settings. Drawing upon the theoretical perspective of dialogic communication and the organization-public dialogic communication (OPDC) model, this study examined the role of dialogic employee communication from organizational leaders in alleviating acquiescent silence and defensive silence. Psychological empowerment and psychological safety were considered as potential mediators. The results of an online survey of 570 full-time employees in the United States revealed that employees were less likely to engage in acquiescent silence or defensive silence when they perceived dialogic employee communication from their leaders. The findings revealed the mediating role of psychological safety between dialogic employee communication from leaders and employee silence. However, psychological empowerment was not found to be a significant mediator. The theoretical and strategic implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47743,"journal":{"name":"Management Communication Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking Employee Silence Through Dialogic Employee Communication: Mediating Roles of Psychological Safety and Psychological Empowerment\",\"authors\":\"Bitt Moon, Minjeong Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08933189241268866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Employee silence, as a distinct behavior that differs from employee voice, might cause serious communication problems in organizational settings. Drawing upon the theoretical perspective of dialogic communication and the organization-public dialogic communication (OPDC) model, this study examined the role of dialogic employee communication from organizational leaders in alleviating acquiescent silence and defensive silence. Psychological empowerment and psychological safety were considered as potential mediators. The results of an online survey of 570 full-time employees in the United States revealed that employees were less likely to engage in acquiescent silence or defensive silence when they perceived dialogic employee communication from their leaders. The findings revealed the mediating role of psychological safety between dialogic employee communication from leaders and employee silence. However, psychological empowerment was not found to be a significant mediator. The theoretical and strategic implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Communication Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Communication Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189241268866\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Communication Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189241268866","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Breaking Employee Silence Through Dialogic Employee Communication: Mediating Roles of Psychological Safety and Psychological Empowerment
Employee silence, as a distinct behavior that differs from employee voice, might cause serious communication problems in organizational settings. Drawing upon the theoretical perspective of dialogic communication and the organization-public dialogic communication (OPDC) model, this study examined the role of dialogic employee communication from organizational leaders in alleviating acquiescent silence and defensive silence. Psychological empowerment and psychological safety were considered as potential mediators. The results of an online survey of 570 full-time employees in the United States revealed that employees were less likely to engage in acquiescent silence or defensive silence when they perceived dialogic employee communication from their leaders. The findings revealed the mediating role of psychological safety between dialogic employee communication from leaders and employee silence. However, psychological empowerment was not found to be a significant mediator. The theoretical and strategic implications are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Management Communication Quarterly presents conceptually rigorous, empirically-driven, and practice-relevant research from across the organizational and management communication fields and has strong appeal across all disciplines concerned with organizational studies and the management sciences. Authors are encouraged to submit original theoretical and empirical manuscripts from a wide variety of methodological perspectives covering such areas as management, communication, organizational studies, organizational behavior and HRM, organizational theory and strategy, critical management studies, leadership, information systems, knowledge and innovation, globalization and international management, corporate communication, and cultural and intercultural studies.