Yuting Fang, Mika Göös, Nathaniel Harms, Pooya Hatami
{"title":"恒定成本通信与 k-Hamming 距离无关","authors":"Yuting Fang, Mika Göös, Nathaniel Harms, Pooya Hatami","doi":"arxiv-2407.20204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every known communication problem whose randomized communication cost is\nconstant (independent of the input size) can be reduced to $k$-Hamming\nDistance, that is, solved with a constant number of deterministic queries to\nsome $k$-Hamming Distance oracle. We exhibit the first examples of\nconstant-cost problems which cannot be reduced to $k$-Hamming Distance. To prove this separation, we relate it to a natural coding-theoretic\nquestion. For $f : \\{2, 4, 6\\} \\to \\mathbb{N}$, we say an encoding function $E\n: \\{0, 1\\}^n \\to \\{0, 1\\}^m$ is an $f$-code if it transforms Hamming distances\naccording to $\\mathrm{dist}(E(x), E(y)) = f(\\mathrm{dist}(x, y))$ whenever $f$\nis defined. We prove that, if there exist $f$-codes for infinitely many $n$,\nthen $f$ must be affine: $f(4) = (f(2) + f(6))/2$.","PeriodicalId":501024,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constant-Cost Communication is not Reducible to k-Hamming Distance\",\"authors\":\"Yuting Fang, Mika Göös, Nathaniel Harms, Pooya Hatami\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.20204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Every known communication problem whose randomized communication cost is\\nconstant (independent of the input size) can be reduced to $k$-Hamming\\nDistance, that is, solved with a constant number of deterministic queries to\\nsome $k$-Hamming Distance oracle. We exhibit the first examples of\\nconstant-cost problems which cannot be reduced to $k$-Hamming Distance. To prove this separation, we relate it to a natural coding-theoretic\\nquestion. For $f : \\\\{2, 4, 6\\\\} \\\\to \\\\mathbb{N}$, we say an encoding function $E\\n: \\\\{0, 1\\\\}^n \\\\to \\\\{0, 1\\\\}^m$ is an $f$-code if it transforms Hamming distances\\naccording to $\\\\mathrm{dist}(E(x), E(y)) = f(\\\\mathrm{dist}(x, y))$ whenever $f$\\nis defined. We prove that, if there exist $f$-codes for infinitely many $n$,\\nthen $f$ must be affine: $f(4) = (f(2) + f(6))/2$.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.20204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.20204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Constant-Cost Communication is not Reducible to k-Hamming Distance
Every known communication problem whose randomized communication cost is
constant (independent of the input size) can be reduced to $k$-Hamming
Distance, that is, solved with a constant number of deterministic queries to
some $k$-Hamming Distance oracle. We exhibit the first examples of
constant-cost problems which cannot be reduced to $k$-Hamming Distance. To prove this separation, we relate it to a natural coding-theoretic
question. For $f : \{2, 4, 6\} \to \mathbb{N}$, we say an encoding function $E
: \{0, 1\}^n \to \{0, 1\}^m$ is an $f$-code if it transforms Hamming distances
according to $\mathrm{dist}(E(x), E(y)) = f(\mathrm{dist}(x, y))$ whenever $f$
is defined. We prove that, if there exist $f$-codes for infinitely many $n$,
then $f$ must be affine: $f(4) = (f(2) + f(6))/2$.