{"title":"多医院全球预算支付对医疗支出和服务量的影响:来自中国丹阳的证据","authors":"Kunhe Lin, Li Xiang","doi":"10.2147/rmhp.s471212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> Global budget payment is currently the prevailing payment strategy internationally. In China, the concept of multi-hospital global budget payment has been proposed with the aims of achieving cost control effects while also encouraging hospital collaboration and optimising allocation of healthcare resources. This study seeks to analyse the impact of multi-hospital global budget payment in China on healthcare expenditure and service volume.<br/><strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> A retrospective comparative study was carried out in Dangyang County, China. The exposure cases were migrants who were not locally registered in the residence registration system. The study period encompassed January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Including 3,246,164 outpatient medical records and 242,685 inpatient medical records. The key variables are medical expenditure and service volume indicators. Continuous variables were reported as mean and tested by <em>t</em>-test. We used interrupted time series analysis models to estimate the changes in the level and trend of each outcome measure after the policy.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> After the outpatient global budget payment reform, the monthly medical expenditure of the hospital alliance has transitioned from a discernible upward trajectory to a deceleration in the rate of growth. The outpatient volume in public and private high-level hospitals decreased at a rate of − 419.26 person/month and − 137.04 person/month, respectively. In terms of inpatient service volume, only private high-level hospitals reported a decrease, with a reduction rate of − 15.38 individuals per month.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study presents new evidence demonstrating that the multi-hospital global budget payment can effectively control costs and promote resource reallocation when implemented jointly with hospital alliance policies. However, overly lenient budget caps risk counterproductive effects.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of the Multi-Hospital Global Budget Payment on Medical Expenditure and Service Volume: The Evidence from Dangyang County, China\",\"authors\":\"Kunhe Lin, Li Xiang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/rmhp.s471212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background:</strong> Global budget payment is currently the prevailing payment strategy internationally. In China, the concept of multi-hospital global budget payment has been proposed with the aims of achieving cost control effects while also encouraging hospital collaboration and optimising allocation of healthcare resources. This study seeks to analyse the impact of multi-hospital global budget payment in China on healthcare expenditure and service volume.<br/><strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> A retrospective comparative study was carried out in Dangyang County, China. The exposure cases were migrants who were not locally registered in the residence registration system. The study period encompassed January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Including 3,246,164 outpatient medical records and 242,685 inpatient medical records. The key variables are medical expenditure and service volume indicators. Continuous variables were reported as mean and tested by <em>t</em>-test. We used interrupted time series analysis models to estimate the changes in the level and trend of each outcome measure after the policy.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> After the outpatient global budget payment reform, the monthly medical expenditure of the hospital alliance has transitioned from a discernible upward trajectory to a deceleration in the rate of growth. The outpatient volume in public and private high-level hospitals decreased at a rate of − 419.26 person/month and − 137.04 person/month, respectively. In terms of inpatient service volume, only private high-level hospitals reported a decrease, with a reduction rate of − 15.38 individuals per month.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study presents new evidence demonstrating that the multi-hospital global budget payment can effectively control costs and promote resource reallocation when implemented jointly with hospital alliance policies. However, overly lenient budget caps risk counterproductive effects.<br/><br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s471212\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s471212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effects of the Multi-Hospital Global Budget Payment on Medical Expenditure and Service Volume: The Evidence from Dangyang County, China
Background: Global budget payment is currently the prevailing payment strategy internationally. In China, the concept of multi-hospital global budget payment has been proposed with the aims of achieving cost control effects while also encouraging hospital collaboration and optimising allocation of healthcare resources. This study seeks to analyse the impact of multi-hospital global budget payment in China on healthcare expenditure and service volume. Materials and Methods: A retrospective comparative study was carried out in Dangyang County, China. The exposure cases were migrants who were not locally registered in the residence registration system. The study period encompassed January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Including 3,246,164 outpatient medical records and 242,685 inpatient medical records. The key variables are medical expenditure and service volume indicators. Continuous variables were reported as mean and tested by t-test. We used interrupted time series analysis models to estimate the changes in the level and trend of each outcome measure after the policy. Results: After the outpatient global budget payment reform, the monthly medical expenditure of the hospital alliance has transitioned from a discernible upward trajectory to a deceleration in the rate of growth. The outpatient volume in public and private high-level hospitals decreased at a rate of − 419.26 person/month and − 137.04 person/month, respectively. In terms of inpatient service volume, only private high-level hospitals reported a decrease, with a reduction rate of − 15.38 individuals per month. Conclusion: This study presents new evidence demonstrating that the multi-hospital global budget payment can effectively control costs and promote resource reallocation when implemented jointly with hospital alliance policies. However, overly lenient budget caps risk counterproductive effects.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.