氢气和甲烷混合物的粘度:实验和模型研究

IF 2.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL International Journal of Thermophysics Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1007/s10765-024-03394-4
Friday Junior Owuna, Antonin Chapoy, Pezhman Ahmadi, Rod Burgass
{"title":"氢气和甲烷混合物的粘度:实验和模型研究","authors":"Friday Junior Owuna,&nbsp;Antonin Chapoy,&nbsp;Pezhman Ahmadi,&nbsp;Rod Burgass","doi":"10.1007/s10765-024-03394-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding of thermophysical and transport properties of H<sub>2</sub>-NG blends are needed for the gradual introduction of hydrogen into the national gas grid. A capillary tube viscometer was used to measure the viscosity of hydrogen + methane blends (with hydrogen mole fraction = 0, 0.1000, 0.1997, 0.5019, and 1) at temperatures from 213 to 324 K and pressures up to 31 MPa. A total 147 experimental viscosity measurements were made for the three H<sub>2</sub> + CH<sub>4</sub> blends and compared against the predictions of five different viscosity models: a one-reference corresponding states (Pedersen) model, a two-reference corresponding states (CS2) model, an extended corresponding states (ECS) model, a corresponding states model derived from molecular dynamic simulations of Lennard Jones (LJ) fluids, and a residual entropy scaling (SRES) method. All the model predictions showed a relatively low deviation compared to the measured viscosities. The density required for viscosity model predictions were computed using Multi-Fluid Helmholtz Energy Approximation (MFHEA) equations of state (EoS). To check the experimental procedure and applicability of the viscometer equipment, viscosity validation measurements were carried out for propane, hydrogen, and methane. The measured viscosities of the pure components were in good agreement with the respective viscosity models with AARD of 0.24%, 0.25%, and 0.58% for propane, hydrogen, and methane, respectively.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":598,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Thermophysics","volume":"45 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10765-024-03394-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viscosity of Hydrogen and Methane Blends: Experimental and Modelling Investigations\",\"authors\":\"Friday Junior Owuna,&nbsp;Antonin Chapoy,&nbsp;Pezhman Ahmadi,&nbsp;Rod Burgass\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10765-024-03394-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Understanding of thermophysical and transport properties of H<sub>2</sub>-NG blends are needed for the gradual introduction of hydrogen into the national gas grid. A capillary tube viscometer was used to measure the viscosity of hydrogen + methane blends (with hydrogen mole fraction = 0, 0.1000, 0.1997, 0.5019, and 1) at temperatures from 213 to 324 K and pressures up to 31 MPa. A total 147 experimental viscosity measurements were made for the three H<sub>2</sub> + CH<sub>4</sub> blends and compared against the predictions of five different viscosity models: a one-reference corresponding states (Pedersen) model, a two-reference corresponding states (CS2) model, an extended corresponding states (ECS) model, a corresponding states model derived from molecular dynamic simulations of Lennard Jones (LJ) fluids, and a residual entropy scaling (SRES) method. All the model predictions showed a relatively low deviation compared to the measured viscosities. The density required for viscosity model predictions were computed using Multi-Fluid Helmholtz Energy Approximation (MFHEA) equations of state (EoS). To check the experimental procedure and applicability of the viscometer equipment, viscosity validation measurements were carried out for propane, hydrogen, and methane. The measured viscosities of the pure components were in good agreement with the respective viscosity models with AARD of 0.24%, 0.25%, and 0.58% for propane, hydrogen, and methane, respectively.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Thermophysics\",\"volume\":\"45 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10765-024-03394-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Thermophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10765-024-03394-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Thermophysics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10765-024-03394-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要将氢气逐步引入国家天然气网,就必须了解氢气-天然气混合物的热物理和传输特性。使用毛细管粘度计测量了氢气 + 甲烷混合物(氢气分子分数 = 0、0.1000、0.1997、0.5019 和 1)在 213 至 324 K 温度和 31 MPa 压力下的粘度。对三种 H2 + CH4 混合物共进行了 147 次粘度实验测量,并与以下五种不同粘度模型的预测结果进行了比较:单参考对应态(Pedersen)模型、双参考对应态(CS2)模型、扩展对应态(ECS)模型、从伦纳德-琼斯(LJ)流体的分子动力学模拟中得出的对应态模型以及残余熵缩放(SRES)方法。与测量的粘度相比,所有模型预测的偏差都相对较小。粘度模型预测所需的密度是通过多流体亥姆霍兹能量近似(MFHEA)状态方程(EoS)计算得出的。为检查粘度计设备的实验程序和适用性,对丙烷、氢气和甲烷进行了粘度验证测量。丙烷、氢气和甲烷测得的纯组分粘度与各自的粘度模型十分吻合,AARD 分别为 0.24%、0.25% 和 0.58%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Viscosity of Hydrogen and Methane Blends: Experimental and Modelling Investigations

Understanding of thermophysical and transport properties of H2-NG blends are needed for the gradual introduction of hydrogen into the national gas grid. A capillary tube viscometer was used to measure the viscosity of hydrogen + methane blends (with hydrogen mole fraction = 0, 0.1000, 0.1997, 0.5019, and 1) at temperatures from 213 to 324 K and pressures up to 31 MPa. A total 147 experimental viscosity measurements were made for the three H2 + CH4 blends and compared against the predictions of five different viscosity models: a one-reference corresponding states (Pedersen) model, a two-reference corresponding states (CS2) model, an extended corresponding states (ECS) model, a corresponding states model derived from molecular dynamic simulations of Lennard Jones (LJ) fluids, and a residual entropy scaling (SRES) method. All the model predictions showed a relatively low deviation compared to the measured viscosities. The density required for viscosity model predictions were computed using Multi-Fluid Helmholtz Energy Approximation (MFHEA) equations of state (EoS). To check the experimental procedure and applicability of the viscometer equipment, viscosity validation measurements were carried out for propane, hydrogen, and methane. The measured viscosities of the pure components were in good agreement with the respective viscosity models with AARD of 0.24%, 0.25%, and 0.58% for propane, hydrogen, and methane, respectively.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
179
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Thermophysics serves as an international medium for the publication of papers in thermophysics, assisting both generators and users of thermophysical properties data. This distinguished journal publishes both experimental and theoretical papers on thermophysical properties of matter in the liquid, gaseous, and solid states (including soft matter, biofluids, and nano- and bio-materials), on instrumentation and techniques leading to their measurement, and on computer studies of model and related systems. Studies in all ranges of temperature, pressure, wavelength, and other relevant variables are included.
期刊最新文献
Experimental Study on Cu–Cu–MWCNTs-Hybrid-Nanocomposite Coated Nanostructured Surfaces for Augmenting Pool Boiling Heat Transfer Performance How Accurate are Your Experimental Data? A More Accessible GUM-Based Methodology for Uncertainty Evaluation Vacuum Insulation Panel Production with Ultralow Thermal Conductivity—A Review Sub-second Surface Tension Measurement of Steels Containing Manganese in Aerodynamic Levitation Speed of Sound Measurements for Liquid Squalane Up to a Pressure of 20 MPa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1