Giulia McCorkell , Amy Nisselle , Donna Halton , Sophie E. Bouffler , Chirag Patel , John Christodoulou , Fran Maher , Belinda McClaren , Gemma R. Brett , Sarah Sandaradura , Kirsten Boggs , Michelle G. de Silva , Fiona Lynch , Ivan Macciocca , Elly Lynch , Melissa Martyn , Stephanie Best , Zornitza Stark , Clara L. Gaff
{"title":"儿科急症护理中的快速基因组学国家教育计划:培养工作人员的信心、能力和才干。","authors":"Giulia McCorkell , Amy Nisselle , Donna Halton , Sophie E. Bouffler , Chirag Patel , John Christodoulou , Fran Maher , Belinda McClaren , Gemma R. Brett , Sarah Sandaradura , Kirsten Boggs , Michelle G. de Silva , Fiona Lynch , Ivan Macciocca , Elly Lynch , Melissa Martyn , Stephanie Best , Zornitza Stark , Clara L. Gaff","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To develop and evaluate a scalable national program to build confidence, competence and capability in the use of rapid genomic testing (rGT) in the acute pediatric setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used theory-informed approaches to design a modular, adaptive program of blended learning aimed at diverse professional groups involved in acute pediatric care. The program comprised 4 online learning modules and an online workshop and was centered on case-based learning. We evaluated the program using the Kirkpatrick 4-level model of training evaluation and report our findings using the Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation (RISE2) guidelines for genomics education and evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two hundred and two participants engaged with at least 1 component of the program. Participants self-reported increased confidence in using rGT, (<em>P</em> < .001), and quiz responses objectively demonstrated increased competence (eg, correct responses to a question on pretest counseling increased from 30% to 64%; <em>P</em> < .001). Additionally, their capability in applying genomic principles to simulated clinical cases increased (<em>P</em> < .001), as did their desire to take on more responsibility for performing rGT. The clinical interpretation of more complex test results (such as negative results or variants of uncertain significance) appeared to be more challenging, indicating a need for targeted education in this area.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The program format was effective in delivering multidisciplinary and wide-scale genomics education in the acute care context. The modular approach we have developed now lends itself to application in other medical specialties or areas of health care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":"26 10","pages":"Article 101224"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024001588/pdfft?md5=3c682c51178587789cb8652060325281&pid=1-s2.0-S1098360024001588-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A national education program for rapid genomics in pediatric acute care: Building workforce confidence, competence, and capability\",\"authors\":\"Giulia McCorkell , Amy Nisselle , Donna Halton , Sophie E. Bouffler , Chirag Patel , John Christodoulou , Fran Maher , Belinda McClaren , Gemma R. Brett , Sarah Sandaradura , Kirsten Boggs , Michelle G. de Silva , Fiona Lynch , Ivan Macciocca , Elly Lynch , Melissa Martyn , Stephanie Best , Zornitza Stark , Clara L. Gaff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To develop and evaluate a scalable national program to build confidence, competence and capability in the use of rapid genomic testing (rGT) in the acute pediatric setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used theory-informed approaches to design a modular, adaptive program of blended learning aimed at diverse professional groups involved in acute pediatric care. The program comprised 4 online learning modules and an online workshop and was centered on case-based learning. We evaluated the program using the Kirkpatrick 4-level model of training evaluation and report our findings using the Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation (RISE2) guidelines for genomics education and evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two hundred and two participants engaged with at least 1 component of the program. Participants self-reported increased confidence in using rGT, (<em>P</em> < .001), and quiz responses objectively demonstrated increased competence (eg, correct responses to a question on pretest counseling increased from 30% to 64%; <em>P</em> < .001). Additionally, their capability in applying genomic principles to simulated clinical cases increased (<em>P</em> < .001), as did their desire to take on more responsibility for performing rGT. The clinical interpretation of more complex test results (such as negative results or variants of uncertain significance) appeared to be more challenging, indicating a need for targeted education in this area.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The program format was effective in delivering multidisciplinary and wide-scale genomics education in the acute care context. The modular approach we have developed now lends itself to application in other medical specialties or areas of health care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetics in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 101224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024001588/pdfft?md5=3c682c51178587789cb8652060325281&pid=1-s2.0-S1098360024001588-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetics in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024001588\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024001588","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A national education program for rapid genomics in pediatric acute care: Building workforce confidence, competence, and capability
Purpose
To develop and evaluate a scalable national program to build confidence, competence and capability in the use of rapid genomic testing (rGT) in the acute pediatric setting.
Methods
We used theory-informed approaches to design a modular, adaptive program of blended learning aimed at diverse professional groups involved in acute pediatric care. The program comprised 4 online learning modules and an online workshop and was centered on case-based learning. We evaluated the program using the Kirkpatrick 4-level model of training evaluation and report our findings using the Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation (RISE2) guidelines for genomics education and evaluation.
Results
Two hundred and two participants engaged with at least 1 component of the program. Participants self-reported increased confidence in using rGT, (P < .001), and quiz responses objectively demonstrated increased competence (eg, correct responses to a question on pretest counseling increased from 30% to 64%; P < .001). Additionally, their capability in applying genomic principles to simulated clinical cases increased (P < .001), as did their desire to take on more responsibility for performing rGT. The clinical interpretation of more complex test results (such as negative results or variants of uncertain significance) appeared to be more challenging, indicating a need for targeted education in this area.
Conclusion
The program format was effective in delivering multidisciplinary and wide-scale genomics education in the acute care context. The modular approach we have developed now lends itself to application in other medical specialties or areas of health care.
期刊介绍:
Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health.
GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.