Juliana R Hougland, Felix Proessl, Nicholas Meglino, Maria C Canino, Adam J Sterczala, Chris Connaboy, Bradley C Nindl, Shawn D Flanagan
{"title":"健康成年人上部、下部和轴向肌肉的绝对和相对皮层脊髓刺激-反应曲线的一致性和一致性。","authors":"Juliana R Hougland, Felix Proessl, Nicholas Meglino, Maria C Canino, Adam J Sterczala, Chris Connaboy, Bradley C Nindl, Shawn D Flanagan","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the agreement and consistency of absolute and relative stimulus-response curve (SRC) parameter estimates for upper extremity, lower extremity, and axial muscles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty (15 W, age: 27.0 ± 6.3 y, height: 171.9 ± 8.9 cm, weight: 80.2 ± 19.3 kg) healthy adults completed absolute (5% to 100% stimulator output) and relative (65% to 160% motor threshold) SRCs of the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis during submaximal isometric contractions. Mean motor-evoked potential amplitudes were fit with nonlinear regression to derive MEP max , V 50 , and slope. Absolute agreement and consistency were assessed with ICCs, Cronbachs alphas, and Bland-Altman plots. Independent t -tests were used to examine differences in motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity among participants with valid and invalid SRC parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Absolute and relative SRCs displayed good agreement and consistency for MEP max and V 50 but not slope. Motor thresholds were lower among participants with valid absolute SRCs for the rectus abdominis and vastus lateralis. Motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity did not differ among those with valid and invalid parameters for all relative SRCs and absolute SRCs for the first dorsal interosseous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Absolute and relative SRCs produce similar MEP max and V 50 estimates in the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis. The validity of absolute and relative SRC results may differ depending on individual characteristics and tested muscles.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"264-271"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement and Consistency of Absolute and Relative Corticospinal Stimulus-Response Curves for Upper, Lower, and Axial Musculature in Healthy Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Juliana R Hougland, Felix Proessl, Nicholas Meglino, Maria C Canino, Adam J Sterczala, Chris Connaboy, Bradley C Nindl, Shawn D Flanagan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the agreement and consistency of absolute and relative stimulus-response curve (SRC) parameter estimates for upper extremity, lower extremity, and axial muscles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty (15 W, age: 27.0 ± 6.3 y, height: 171.9 ± 8.9 cm, weight: 80.2 ± 19.3 kg) healthy adults completed absolute (5% to 100% stimulator output) and relative (65% to 160% motor threshold) SRCs of the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis during submaximal isometric contractions. Mean motor-evoked potential amplitudes were fit with nonlinear regression to derive MEP max , V 50 , and slope. Absolute agreement and consistency were assessed with ICCs, Cronbachs alphas, and Bland-Altman plots. Independent t -tests were used to examine differences in motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity among participants with valid and invalid SRC parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Absolute and relative SRCs displayed good agreement and consistency for MEP max and V 50 but not slope. Motor thresholds were lower among participants with valid absolute SRCs for the rectus abdominis and vastus lateralis. Motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity did not differ among those with valid and invalid parameters for all relative SRCs and absolute SRCs for the first dorsal interosseous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Absolute and relative SRCs produce similar MEP max and V 50 estimates in the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis. The validity of absolute and relative SRC results may differ depending on individual characteristics and tested muscles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"264-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Agreement and Consistency of Absolute and Relative Corticospinal Stimulus-Response Curves for Upper, Lower, and Axial Musculature in Healthy Adults.
Purpose: To assess the agreement and consistency of absolute and relative stimulus-response curve (SRC) parameter estimates for upper extremity, lower extremity, and axial muscles.
Methods: Thirty (15 W, age: 27.0 ± 6.3 y, height: 171.9 ± 8.9 cm, weight: 80.2 ± 19.3 kg) healthy adults completed absolute (5% to 100% stimulator output) and relative (65% to 160% motor threshold) SRCs of the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis during submaximal isometric contractions. Mean motor-evoked potential amplitudes were fit with nonlinear regression to derive MEP max , V 50 , and slope. Absolute agreement and consistency were assessed with ICCs, Cronbachs alphas, and Bland-Altman plots. Independent t -tests were used to examine differences in motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity among participants with valid and invalid SRC parameters.
Results: Absolute and relative SRCs displayed good agreement and consistency for MEP max and V 50 but not slope. Motor thresholds were lower among participants with valid absolute SRCs for the rectus abdominis and vastus lateralis. Motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity did not differ among those with valid and invalid parameters for all relative SRCs and absolute SRCs for the first dorsal interosseous.
Conclusions: Absolute and relative SRCs produce similar MEP max and V 50 estimates in the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis. The validity of absolute and relative SRC results may differ depending on individual characteristics and tested muscles.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment.
Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.