健康成年人上部、下部和轴向肌肉的绝对和相对皮层脊髓刺激-反应曲线的一致性和一致性。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000001109
Juliana R Hougland, Felix Proessl, Nicholas Meglino, Maria C Canino, Adam J Sterczala, Chris Connaboy, Bradley C Nindl, Shawn D Flanagan
{"title":"健康成年人上部、下部和轴向肌肉的绝对和相对皮层脊髓刺激-反应曲线的一致性和一致性。","authors":"Juliana R Hougland, Felix Proessl, Nicholas Meglino, Maria C Canino, Adam J Sterczala, Chris Connaboy, Bradley C Nindl, Shawn D Flanagan","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the agreement and consistency of absolute and relative stimulus-response curve (SRC) parameter estimates for upper extremity, lower extremity, and axial muscles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty (15 W, age: 27.0 ± 6.3 y, height: 171.9 ± 8.9 cm, weight: 80.2 ± 19.3 kg) healthy adults completed absolute (5% to 100% stimulator output) and relative (65% to 160% motor threshold) SRCs of the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis during submaximal isometric contractions. Mean motor-evoked potential amplitudes were fit with nonlinear regression to derive MEP max , V 50 , and slope. Absolute agreement and consistency were assessed with ICCs, Cronbachs alphas, and Bland-Altman plots. Independent t -tests were used to examine differences in motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity among participants with valid and invalid SRC parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Absolute and relative SRCs displayed good agreement and consistency for MEP max and V 50 but not slope. Motor thresholds were lower among participants with valid absolute SRCs for the rectus abdominis and vastus lateralis. Motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity did not differ among those with valid and invalid parameters for all relative SRCs and absolute SRCs for the first dorsal interosseous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Absolute and relative SRCs produce similar MEP max and V 50 estimates in the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis. The validity of absolute and relative SRC results may differ depending on individual characteristics and tested muscles.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"264-271"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement and Consistency of Absolute and Relative Corticospinal Stimulus-Response Curves for Upper, Lower, and Axial Musculature in Healthy Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Juliana R Hougland, Felix Proessl, Nicholas Meglino, Maria C Canino, Adam J Sterczala, Chris Connaboy, Bradley C Nindl, Shawn D Flanagan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the agreement and consistency of absolute and relative stimulus-response curve (SRC) parameter estimates for upper extremity, lower extremity, and axial muscles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty (15 W, age: 27.0 ± 6.3 y, height: 171.9 ± 8.9 cm, weight: 80.2 ± 19.3 kg) healthy adults completed absolute (5% to 100% stimulator output) and relative (65% to 160% motor threshold) SRCs of the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis during submaximal isometric contractions. Mean motor-evoked potential amplitudes were fit with nonlinear regression to derive MEP max , V 50 , and slope. Absolute agreement and consistency were assessed with ICCs, Cronbachs alphas, and Bland-Altman plots. Independent t -tests were used to examine differences in motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity among participants with valid and invalid SRC parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Absolute and relative SRCs displayed good agreement and consistency for MEP max and V 50 but not slope. Motor thresholds were lower among participants with valid absolute SRCs for the rectus abdominis and vastus lateralis. Motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity did not differ among those with valid and invalid parameters for all relative SRCs and absolute SRCs for the first dorsal interosseous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Absolute and relative SRCs produce similar MEP max and V 50 estimates in the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis. The validity of absolute and relative SRC results may differ depending on individual characteristics and tested muscles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"264-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估上肢、下肢和轴肌的绝对和相对刺激-反应曲线(SRC)参数估计的一致性:30 名(15 W,年龄:27.0 ± 6.3 岁,身高:171.9 ± 8.9 厘米,体重:80.2 ± 19.3 千克)健康成年人在亚最大等长收缩过程中完成了第一背侧骨间肌、阔筋膜外肌和腹直肌的绝对(5% 至 100% 刺激器输出)和相对(65% 至 160% 运动阈值)SRC。用非线性回归拟合平均运动诱发电位振幅,得出 MEPmax、V50 和斜率。通过 ICCs、Cronbachs alphas 和 Bland-Altman 图评估绝对一致度和一致性。使用独立 t 检验来检查具有有效和无效 SRC 参数的参与者在运动阈值、体力活动、力量和肌肉活动方面的差异:结果:MEPmax 和 V50 的绝对 SRC 和相对 SRC 显示出很好的一致性和连贯性,但斜率没有。腹直肌和阔筋膜外肌绝对 SRC 有效的参与者的运动阈值较低。对于所有相对 SRC 和第一背侧骨间肌绝对 SRC,运动阈值、体力活动、力量和肌肉活动在参数有效和无效者之间没有差异:结论:绝对和相对 SRC 对第一背侧骨间肌、阔筋膜外肌和腹直肌产生相似的 MEPmax 和 V50 估计值。绝对 SRC 和相对 SRC 结果的有效性可能因个体特征和测试肌肉的不同而不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Agreement and Consistency of Absolute and Relative Corticospinal Stimulus-Response Curves for Upper, Lower, and Axial Musculature in Healthy Adults.

Purpose: To assess the agreement and consistency of absolute and relative stimulus-response curve (SRC) parameter estimates for upper extremity, lower extremity, and axial muscles.

Methods: Thirty (15 W, age: 27.0 ± 6.3 y, height: 171.9 ± 8.9 cm, weight: 80.2 ± 19.3 kg) healthy adults completed absolute (5% to 100% stimulator output) and relative (65% to 160% motor threshold) SRCs of the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis during submaximal isometric contractions. Mean motor-evoked potential amplitudes were fit with nonlinear regression to derive MEP max , V 50 , and slope. Absolute agreement and consistency were assessed with ICCs, Cronbachs alphas, and Bland-Altman plots. Independent t -tests were used to examine differences in motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity among participants with valid and invalid SRC parameters.

Results: Absolute and relative SRCs displayed good agreement and consistency for MEP max and V 50 but not slope. Motor thresholds were lower among participants with valid absolute SRCs for the rectus abdominis and vastus lateralis. Motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity did not differ among those with valid and invalid parameters for all relative SRCs and absolute SRCs for the first dorsal interosseous.

Conclusions: Absolute and relative SRCs produce similar MEP max and V 50 estimates in the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis. The validity of absolute and relative SRC results may differ depending on individual characteristics and tested muscles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
期刊最新文献
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Tethered Cord Syndrome Surgery: Predictive Values and Clinical Outcome. Direct (D)-Wave Monitoring Enhancement With Subdural Electrode Placement: A Case Series. Survey of Continuous EEG Monitoring Practices in the United States. A Proposed Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Nomenclature and Call for Standardization. The Fingerprint of Scalp-EEG in Drug-Resistant Frontal Lobe Epilepsies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1