临床医生对基因疗法作为杜兴氏肌肉萎缩症治疗方案的看法。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JND-240033
Heidi Cope, Ryan Fischer, Emma Heslop, Megan McNiff, Alexandra Johnson, Eric Camino, Brian Denger, Niki Armstrong, Sejal Thakrar, Alison Bateman-House, Katherine L Beaverson, Ione O C Woollacott, Dawn Phillips, Vivian Fernandez, Annie Ganot, Roxana Donisa-Dreghici, Carol Mansfield, Holly Peay
{"title":"临床医生对基因疗法作为杜兴氏肌肉萎缩症治疗方案的看法。","authors":"Heidi Cope, Ryan Fischer, Emma Heslop, Megan McNiff, Alexandra Johnson, Eric Camino, Brian Denger, Niki Armstrong, Sejal Thakrar, Alison Bateman-House, Katherine L Beaverson, Ione O C Woollacott, Dawn Phillips, Vivian Fernandez, Annie Ganot, Roxana Donisa-Dreghici, Carol Mansfield, Holly Peay","doi":"10.3233/JND-240033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive, life-limiting, neuromuscular disorder. Clinicians play an important role in informing families about therapy options, including approved gene therapies and clinical trials of unapproved therapies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand the perspectives of clinicians about gene therapy for DMD, which has not previously been studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted interviews with specialist clinicians treating patients with DMD in the United States (n = 8) and United Kingdom (n = 8). Interviews were completed in 2022, before any approved gene therapies, to gain insight into barriers and facilitators to implementing gene therapy and educational needs of clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents expressed cautious optimism about gene therapy. Responses varied regarding potential benefits with most expecting delayed progression and duration of benefit (1 year to lifelong). Concern about anticipated risks also varied; types of anticipated risks included immunological reactions, liver toxicity, and cardiac or renal dysfunction. Clinicians generally, but not uniformly, understood that gene therapy for DMD would not be curative. Most reported needing demonstrable clinical benefit to justify treatment-related risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data demonstrate variability in knowledge and attitudes about gene therapy among clinicians who follow patients with DMD. As our knowledge base about DMD gene therapy grows, clinician education is vital to ensuring that accurate information is communicated to patients and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician Perspectives of Gene Therapy as a Treatment Option for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.\",\"authors\":\"Heidi Cope, Ryan Fischer, Emma Heslop, Megan McNiff, Alexandra Johnson, Eric Camino, Brian Denger, Niki Armstrong, Sejal Thakrar, Alison Bateman-House, Katherine L Beaverson, Ione O C Woollacott, Dawn Phillips, Vivian Fernandez, Annie Ganot, Roxana Donisa-Dreghici, Carol Mansfield, Holly Peay\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/JND-240033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive, life-limiting, neuromuscular disorder. Clinicians play an important role in informing families about therapy options, including approved gene therapies and clinical trials of unapproved therapies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand the perspectives of clinicians about gene therapy for DMD, which has not previously been studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted interviews with specialist clinicians treating patients with DMD in the United States (n = 8) and United Kingdom (n = 8). Interviews were completed in 2022, before any approved gene therapies, to gain insight into barriers and facilitators to implementing gene therapy and educational needs of clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents expressed cautious optimism about gene therapy. Responses varied regarding potential benefits with most expecting delayed progression and duration of benefit (1 year to lifelong). Concern about anticipated risks also varied; types of anticipated risks included immunological reactions, liver toxicity, and cardiac or renal dysfunction. Clinicians generally, but not uniformly, understood that gene therapy for DMD would not be curative. Most reported needing demonstrable clinical benefit to justify treatment-related risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data demonstrate variability in knowledge and attitudes about gene therapy among clinicians who follow patients with DMD. As our knowledge base about DMD gene therapy grows, clinician education is vital to ensuring that accurate information is communicated to patients and families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380263/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/JND-240033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JND-240033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍杜兴氏肌营养不良症(DMD)是一种进展性、限制生命的神经肌肉疾病。临床医生在向患者家属介绍治疗方案(包括已批准的基因疗法和未批准疗法的临床试验)方面发挥着重要作用:本研究旨在了解临床医生对 DMD 基因疗法的看法,此前尚未对该疗法进行过研究:我们对美国(8 人)和英国(8 人)治疗 DMD 患者的专科临床医生进行了访谈。访谈于 2022 年完成,当时还没有任何基因疗法获得批准,目的是深入了解实施基因疗法的障碍和促进因素以及临床医生的教育需求:结果:大多数受访者对基因疗法表示谨慎乐观。关于基因疗法的潜在益处,受访者的回答各不相同,大多数人期望延缓病情恶化并延长获益时间(1 年至终身)。对预期风险的担忧也各不相同;预期风险的类型包括免疫反应、肝脏毒性、心脏或肾功能障碍。临床医生普遍(但并不一致)理解,DMD 的基因疗法不能治愈疾病。大多数人表示需要可证明的临床获益来证明治疗相关风险的合理性:我们的数据表明,跟踪 DMD 患者的临床医生对基因治疗的认识和态度存在差异。随着我们对 DMD 基因疗法的了解越来越多,临床医生的教育对于确保向患者和家属传达准确信息至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinician Perspectives of Gene Therapy as a Treatment Option for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive, life-limiting, neuromuscular disorder. Clinicians play an important role in informing families about therapy options, including approved gene therapies and clinical trials of unapproved therapies.

Objective: This study aimed to understand the perspectives of clinicians about gene therapy for DMD, which has not previously been studied.

Methods: We conducted interviews with specialist clinicians treating patients with DMD in the United States (n = 8) and United Kingdom (n = 8). Interviews were completed in 2022, before any approved gene therapies, to gain insight into barriers and facilitators to implementing gene therapy and educational needs of clinicians.

Results: Most respondents expressed cautious optimism about gene therapy. Responses varied regarding potential benefits with most expecting delayed progression and duration of benefit (1 year to lifelong). Concern about anticipated risks also varied; types of anticipated risks included immunological reactions, liver toxicity, and cardiac or renal dysfunction. Clinicians generally, but not uniformly, understood that gene therapy for DMD would not be curative. Most reported needing demonstrable clinical benefit to justify treatment-related risks.

Conclusions: Our data demonstrate variability in knowledge and attitudes about gene therapy among clinicians who follow patients with DMD. As our knowledge base about DMD gene therapy grows, clinician education is vital to ensuring that accurate information is communicated to patients and families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1