坐位时,对侧非受试者的脚趾离开地面时,基于腰带稳定的手持式或等速测力计的等长膝关节伸肌力量测试的可靠性。

Masahiro Hirano, Munenori Katoh
{"title":"坐位时,对侧非受试者的脚趾离开地面时,基于腰带稳定的手持式或等速测力计的等长膝关节伸肌力量测试的可靠性。","authors":"Masahiro Hirano, Munenori Katoh","doi":"10.1589/jpts.36.402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[Purpose] To determine the intra-rater and inter-devices reliability of isometric knee-extensor muscle-strength-measurement. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 77 university students (50 males; 27 females) who underwent isometric knee-extension muscle-strength measurement twice with a belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer and isokinetic dynamometer. The intra-rater and inter-devices reliability was ascertained from measurements that were performed with the participant seated on the edge of the bed, the toes of the contralateral nonexamined side off the floor, and the trunk supported by the upper limb. [Results] In the overall, male, and female cohorts, the 95% confidence intervals of intra-rater reliabilities (1,1) in the belt-stabilized handheld and isokinetic dynamometers were 0.96-0.98, 0.92-0.97, and 0.81-0.96, 0.82-0.92, 0.73-0.90, and 0.78-0.95, respectively, and the inter-device 95% confidence intervals were 0.52-0.77, 0.28-0.69, and -0.03 to 0.63, respectively. Compared to the belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer group, the isokinetic dynamometer group had higher knee-extension muscle strength. [Conclusion] The intra-rater reliability was rated good-to-excellent and moderate-to-excellent for the belt-stabilized handheld and isokinetic dynamometers, respectively. The inter-devices reliability was poor, and isometric knee-extension muscle strength in the isokinetic dynamometer group was higher than that in the belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer group.</p>","PeriodicalId":16834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","volume":"36 8","pages":"402-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of belt-stabilized handheld or isokinetic dynamometer-based isometric knee-extensor strength-testing when seated with the toes of the contralateral nonexamined side off the floor.\",\"authors\":\"Masahiro Hirano, Munenori Katoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1589/jpts.36.402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>[Purpose] To determine the intra-rater and inter-devices reliability of isometric knee-extensor muscle-strength-measurement. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 77 university students (50 males; 27 females) who underwent isometric knee-extension muscle-strength measurement twice with a belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer and isokinetic dynamometer. The intra-rater and inter-devices reliability was ascertained from measurements that were performed with the participant seated on the edge of the bed, the toes of the contralateral nonexamined side off the floor, and the trunk supported by the upper limb. [Results] In the overall, male, and female cohorts, the 95% confidence intervals of intra-rater reliabilities (1,1) in the belt-stabilized handheld and isokinetic dynamometers were 0.96-0.98, 0.92-0.97, and 0.81-0.96, 0.82-0.92, 0.73-0.90, and 0.78-0.95, respectively, and the inter-device 95% confidence intervals were 0.52-0.77, 0.28-0.69, and -0.03 to 0.63, respectively. Compared to the belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer group, the isokinetic dynamometer group had higher knee-extension muscle strength. [Conclusion] The intra-rater reliability was rated good-to-excellent and moderate-to-excellent for the belt-stabilized handheld and isokinetic dynamometers, respectively. The inter-devices reliability was poor, and isometric knee-extension muscle strength in the isokinetic dynamometer group was higher than that in the belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physical Therapy Science\",\"volume\":\"36 8\",\"pages\":\"402-406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290865/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physical Therapy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.36.402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.36.402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

[目的]确定等长伸膝肌力测量的评分者内部和设备间可靠性。[参与者和方法] 参与者为 77 名大学生(50 名男性;27 名女性),他们使用腰带固定式手持测力计和等动式测力计进行了两次等长伸膝肌力测量。测量时,受试者坐在床边,对侧非受试侧的脚趾离开地面,躯干由上肢支撑。[结果]在总体、男性和女性组别中,腰带稳定式手持测力计和等动式测力计的评分者内部信度(1,1)的95%置信区间分别为0.96-0.98、0.92-0.97和0.81-0.96、0.82-0.92、0.73-0.90和0.78-0.95,设备间95%置信区间分别为0.52-0.77、0.28-0.69和-0.03-0.63。与腰带稳定手持测力计组相比,等速测力计组的膝关节伸展肌力更高。[结论]腰带稳定手持式测力计和等动式测力计的评分者内部可靠性分别被评为良好至优秀和中等至优秀。设备间的可靠性较差,等动测力计组的等长膝关节伸展肌力高于腰带稳定手持式测力计组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of belt-stabilized handheld or isokinetic dynamometer-based isometric knee-extensor strength-testing when seated with the toes of the contralateral nonexamined side off the floor.

[Purpose] To determine the intra-rater and inter-devices reliability of isometric knee-extensor muscle-strength-measurement. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 77 university students (50 males; 27 females) who underwent isometric knee-extension muscle-strength measurement twice with a belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer and isokinetic dynamometer. The intra-rater and inter-devices reliability was ascertained from measurements that were performed with the participant seated on the edge of the bed, the toes of the contralateral nonexamined side off the floor, and the trunk supported by the upper limb. [Results] In the overall, male, and female cohorts, the 95% confidence intervals of intra-rater reliabilities (1,1) in the belt-stabilized handheld and isokinetic dynamometers were 0.96-0.98, 0.92-0.97, and 0.81-0.96, 0.82-0.92, 0.73-0.90, and 0.78-0.95, respectively, and the inter-device 95% confidence intervals were 0.52-0.77, 0.28-0.69, and -0.03 to 0.63, respectively. Compared to the belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer group, the isokinetic dynamometer group had higher knee-extension muscle strength. [Conclusion] The intra-rater reliability was rated good-to-excellent and moderate-to-excellent for the belt-stabilized handheld and isokinetic dynamometers, respectively. The inter-devices reliability was poor, and isometric knee-extension muscle strength in the isokinetic dynamometer group was higher than that in the belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relationship between non-cognitive skills and academic performance in Japanese physical therapy students: an exploratory study. Management of physical activity using a wearable device during intensive decongestive therapy in patient with lower limb lymphedema: a case report. Preoperative osteosarcopenia predicts adverse outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The status of step-count monitoring and its association with physical activity and sedentary time among older adults: a cross-sectional study of silver human resources center members. Relationship between perception of healthcare services and health-related quality of life in mothers of children with disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1