使用一种新的早期最佳恢复指标,对接受初级全膝关节置换术患者的两种植入物设计进行评估:一项回顾性观察研究。

Q1 Medicine MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1007/s12306-024-00851-z
L Z van Keulen, R J A Sonnega, N R A Baas, T Hogervorst, C Muehlendyck, P Bourras, T A J Ten Kate, T Galvain, S Dieleman, P M van Kampen
{"title":"使用一种新的早期最佳恢复指标,对接受初级全膝关节置换术患者的两种植入物设计进行评估:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"L Z van Keulen, R J A Sonnega, N R A Baas, T Hogervorst, C Muehlendyck, P Bourras, T A J Ten Kate, T Galvain, S Dieleman, P M van Kampen","doi":"10.1007/s12306-024-00851-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Quality of care in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between implants was assessed using a novel composite outcome measure, early optimal recovery (EOR), to indicate ideal clinical outcomes and minimal healthcare resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients that underwent primary TKA in the study group (ATTUNE® Knee System) or control group (LCS® COMPLETE Knee System) were included in this retrospective, single-center study. EOR was defined as no complications, no readmissions, no extra outpatient visits, ≤ 48 h length of hospital stay (LOS), and restored range of motion and pain perception at 3-month follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare EOR between the study and control groups. Results were adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics and are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data were collected from a specialized clinic for elective surgeries in the Netherlands, between January 2017 and December 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 566 patients (62.4% female, mean age 67 years) were included for analysis; 185 patients (32.7%) underwent TKA in the study group. Compared to the control group, patients in the study group had greater probability of achieving EOR (65.8% [95% CI: 55.1-75.2] vs. 38.9% [95% CI: 32.8-45.3]; p < 0.001), a LOS ≤ 48 h (77.2% [95% CI: 67.7-84.5] vs. 61.4% [95% CI: 54.7-67.7]; p < 0.05), and ideal pain perception at 3-month follow-up (93.3% [95% CI: 85.7-97.0] vs. 78.2% [95% CI: 71.0-83.9]; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study group was associated with a greater probability of achieving EOR versus the control group, suggesting improved quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":18875,"journal":{"name":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating two implant designs in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty using a novel measure of early optimal recovery: a retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"L Z van Keulen, R J A Sonnega, N R A Baas, T Hogervorst, C Muehlendyck, P Bourras, T A J Ten Kate, T Galvain, S Dieleman, P M van Kampen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12306-024-00851-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Quality of care in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between implants was assessed using a novel composite outcome measure, early optimal recovery (EOR), to indicate ideal clinical outcomes and minimal healthcare resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients that underwent primary TKA in the study group (ATTUNE® Knee System) or control group (LCS® COMPLETE Knee System) were included in this retrospective, single-center study. EOR was defined as no complications, no readmissions, no extra outpatient visits, ≤ 48 h length of hospital stay (LOS), and restored range of motion and pain perception at 3-month follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare EOR between the study and control groups. Results were adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics and are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data were collected from a specialized clinic for elective surgeries in the Netherlands, between January 2017 and December 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 566 patients (62.4% female, mean age 67 years) were included for analysis; 185 patients (32.7%) underwent TKA in the study group. Compared to the control group, patients in the study group had greater probability of achieving EOR (65.8% [95% CI: 55.1-75.2] vs. 38.9% [95% CI: 32.8-45.3]; p < 0.001), a LOS ≤ 48 h (77.2% [95% CI: 67.7-84.5] vs. 61.4% [95% CI: 54.7-67.7]; p < 0.05), and ideal pain perception at 3-month follow-up (93.3% [95% CI: 85.7-97.0] vs. 78.2% [95% CI: 71.0-83.9]; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study group was associated with a greater probability of achieving EOR versus the control group, suggesting improved quality of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-024-00851-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-024-00851-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用一种新的复合结果指标--早期最佳恢复(EOR)来评估植入物间全膝关节置换术(TKA)的护理质量,以显示理想的临床结果和最低的医疗资源利用率:这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了在研究组(ATTUNE® 膝关节系统)或对照组(LCS® COMPLETE 膝关节系统)接受初次 TKA 的患者。EOR的定义是无并发症、无再入院、无额外门诊就诊、住院时间(LOS)不超过48小时、随访3个月时活动范围和疼痛感得到恢复。多变量逻辑回归用于比较研究组和对照组的 EOR。结果根据基线特征的差异进行了调整,并以 95% 的置信区间 (CI) 表示。数据收集自荷兰一家择期手术专科诊所,时间为2017年1月至2020年12月:共纳入566名患者(62.4%为女性,平均年龄67岁)进行分析;研究组中有185名患者(32.7%)接受了TKA手术。与对照组相比,研究组患者获得 EOR 的概率更高(65.8% [95% CI:55.1-75.2] vs. 38.9% [95% CI:32.8-45.3];P 结论:研究组患者获得 EOR 的概率更高(65.8% [95% CI:55.1-75.2] vs. 38.9% [95% CI:32.8-45.3]):与对照组相比,研究组获得 EOR 的概率更高,这表明护理质量得到了改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating two implant designs in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty using a novel measure of early optimal recovery: a retrospective observational study.

Purpose: Quality of care in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between implants was assessed using a novel composite outcome measure, early optimal recovery (EOR), to indicate ideal clinical outcomes and minimal healthcare resource utilization.

Methods: Patients that underwent primary TKA in the study group (ATTUNE® Knee System) or control group (LCS® COMPLETE Knee System) were included in this retrospective, single-center study. EOR was defined as no complications, no readmissions, no extra outpatient visits, ≤ 48 h length of hospital stay (LOS), and restored range of motion and pain perception at 3-month follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare EOR between the study and control groups. Results were adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics and are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data were collected from a specialized clinic for elective surgeries in the Netherlands, between January 2017 and December 2020.

Results: A total of 566 patients (62.4% female, mean age 67 years) were included for analysis; 185 patients (32.7%) underwent TKA in the study group. Compared to the control group, patients in the study group had greater probability of achieving EOR (65.8% [95% CI: 55.1-75.2] vs. 38.9% [95% CI: 32.8-45.3]; p < 0.001), a LOS ≤ 48 h (77.2% [95% CI: 67.7-84.5] vs. 61.4% [95% CI: 54.7-67.7]; p < 0.05), and ideal pain perception at 3-month follow-up (93.3% [95% CI: 85.7-97.0] vs. 78.2% [95% CI: 71.0-83.9]; p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The study group was associated with a greater probability of achieving EOR versus the control group, suggesting improved quality of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Surgery – Formerly La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, founded in 1917 at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. The journal provides up-to-date information to clinicians and scientists through the publication of original papers, reviews, case reports, and brief communications dealing with the pathogenesis and treatment of orthopaedic conditions.An electronic version is also available at http://www.springerlink.com.The journal is open for publication of supplements and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editors-in-Chief or the Publisher.
期刊最新文献
Identification of potential genes associated with metastasis in osteosarcoma: an integrated bioinformatics analysis. Outcome of total knee arthroplasty in patients with Blount disease or Blount-like deformity: a systematic review. Returning to running after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and a novel multimodal protocol. Outcome of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty conversion: a systematic review. Artificial intelligence in orthopedic research assistance: a resident's perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1