综合耐药性和白血病干细胞基因表达评分可预测来自 10 项试验的 3500 多名急性髓细胞性白血病患者的预后。

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY NPJ Precision Oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1038/s41698-024-00643-5
Abdelrahman H. Elsayed, Xueyuan Cao, Richard J. Marrero, Nam H. K. Nguyen, Huiyun Wu, Yonhui Ni, Raul C. Ribeiro, Herold Tobias, Peter J. Valk, François Béliveau, Guillaume Richard-Carpentier, Josée Hébert, C. Michel Zwaan, Alan Gamis, Edward Anders Kolb, Richard Aplenc, Todd A. Alonzo, Soheil Meshinchi, Jeffrey Rubnitz, Stanley Pounds, Jatinder K. Lamba
{"title":"综合耐药性和白血病干细胞基因表达评分可预测来自 10 项试验的 3500 多名急性髓细胞性白血病患者的预后。","authors":"Abdelrahman H. Elsayed, Xueyuan Cao, Richard J. Marrero, Nam H. K. Nguyen, Huiyun Wu, Yonhui Ni, Raul C. Ribeiro, Herold Tobias, Peter J. Valk, François Béliveau, Guillaume Richard-Carpentier, Josée Hébert, C. Michel Zwaan, Alan Gamis, Edward Anders Kolb, Richard Aplenc, Todd A. Alonzo, Soheil Meshinchi, Jeffrey Rubnitz, Stanley Pounds, Jatinder K. Lamba","doi":"10.1038/s41698-024-00643-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we leveraged machine-learning tools by evaluating expression of genes of pharmacological relevance to standard-AML chemotherapy (ara-C/daunorubicin/etoposide) in a discovery-cohort of pediatric AML patients (N = 163; NCT00136084 ) and defined a 5-gene-drug resistance score (ADE-RS5) that was predictive of outcome (high MRD1 positivity p = 0.013; lower EFS p < 0.0001 and OS p < 0.0001). ADE-RS5 was integrated with a previously defined leukemic-stemness signature (pLSC6) to classify patients into four groups. ADE-RS5, pLSC6 and integrated-score was evaluated for association with outcome in one of the largest assembly of ~3600 AML patients from 10 independent cohorts (1861 pediatric and 1773 adult AML). Patients with high ADE-RS5 had poor outcome in validation cohorts and the previously reported pLSC6 maintained strong significant association in all validation cohorts. For pLSC6/ADE-RS5-integrated-score analysis, using Group-1 (low-scores for ADE-RS5 and pLSC6) as reference, Group-4 (high-scores for ADE-RS5 and pLSC6) showed worst outcome (EFS: p < 0.0001 and OS: p < 0.0001). Groups-2/3 (one high and one low-score) showed intermediate outcome (p < 0.001). Integrated score groups remained an independent predictor of outcome in multivariable-analysis after adjusting for established prognostic factors (EFS: Group 2 vs. 1, HR = 4.68, p < 0.001, Group 3 vs. 1, HR = 3.22, p = 0.01, and Group 4 vs. 1, HR = 7.26, p < 0.001). These results highlight the significant prognostic value of transcriptomics-based scores capturing disease aggressiveness through pLSC6 and drug resistance via ADE-RS5. The pLSC6 stemness score is a significant predictor of outcome and associates with high-risk group features, the ADE-RS5 drug resistance score adds further value, reflecting the clinical utility of simultaneous testing of both for optimizing treatment strategies.","PeriodicalId":19433,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Precision Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated drug resistance and leukemic stemness gene-expression scores predict outcomes in large cohort of over 3500 AML patients from 10 trials\",\"authors\":\"Abdelrahman H. Elsayed, Xueyuan Cao, Richard J. Marrero, Nam H. K. Nguyen, Huiyun Wu, Yonhui Ni, Raul C. Ribeiro, Herold Tobias, Peter J. Valk, François Béliveau, Guillaume Richard-Carpentier, Josée Hébert, C. Michel Zwaan, Alan Gamis, Edward Anders Kolb, Richard Aplenc, Todd A. Alonzo, Soheil Meshinchi, Jeffrey Rubnitz, Stanley Pounds, Jatinder K. Lamba\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41698-024-00643-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we leveraged machine-learning tools by evaluating expression of genes of pharmacological relevance to standard-AML chemotherapy (ara-C/daunorubicin/etoposide) in a discovery-cohort of pediatric AML patients (N = 163; NCT00136084 ) and defined a 5-gene-drug resistance score (ADE-RS5) that was predictive of outcome (high MRD1 positivity p = 0.013; lower EFS p < 0.0001 and OS p < 0.0001). ADE-RS5 was integrated with a previously defined leukemic-stemness signature (pLSC6) to classify patients into four groups. ADE-RS5, pLSC6 and integrated-score was evaluated for association with outcome in one of the largest assembly of ~3600 AML patients from 10 independent cohorts (1861 pediatric and 1773 adult AML). Patients with high ADE-RS5 had poor outcome in validation cohorts and the previously reported pLSC6 maintained strong significant association in all validation cohorts. For pLSC6/ADE-RS5-integrated-score analysis, using Group-1 (low-scores for ADE-RS5 and pLSC6) as reference, Group-4 (high-scores for ADE-RS5 and pLSC6) showed worst outcome (EFS: p < 0.0001 and OS: p < 0.0001). Groups-2/3 (one high and one low-score) showed intermediate outcome (p < 0.001). Integrated score groups remained an independent predictor of outcome in multivariable-analysis after adjusting for established prognostic factors (EFS: Group 2 vs. 1, HR = 4.68, p < 0.001, Group 3 vs. 1, HR = 3.22, p = 0.01, and Group 4 vs. 1, HR = 7.26, p < 0.001). These results highlight the significant prognostic value of transcriptomics-based scores capturing disease aggressiveness through pLSC6 and drug resistance via ADE-RS5. The pLSC6 stemness score is a significant predictor of outcome and associates with high-risk group features, the ADE-RS5 drug resistance score adds further value, reflecting the clinical utility of simultaneous testing of both for optimizing treatment strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Precision Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294346/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Precision Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41698-024-00643-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Precision Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41698-024-00643-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们利用机器学习工具,评估了儿科急性髓细胞性白血病患者发现队列(N = 163;NCT00136084)中与标准急性髓细胞性白血病化疗(阿糖胞苷/大柔比星/依托泊苷)药理学相关的基因表达,并定义了可预测预后的 5 基因耐药评分(ADE-RS5)(高 MRD1 阳性 p = 0.013;较低 EFS p = 0.013;较低 EFS p = 0.013)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrated drug resistance and leukemic stemness gene-expression scores predict outcomes in large cohort of over 3500 AML patients from 10 trials
In this study, we leveraged machine-learning tools by evaluating expression of genes of pharmacological relevance to standard-AML chemotherapy (ara-C/daunorubicin/etoposide) in a discovery-cohort of pediatric AML patients (N = 163; NCT00136084 ) and defined a 5-gene-drug resistance score (ADE-RS5) that was predictive of outcome (high MRD1 positivity p = 0.013; lower EFS p < 0.0001 and OS p < 0.0001). ADE-RS5 was integrated with a previously defined leukemic-stemness signature (pLSC6) to classify patients into four groups. ADE-RS5, pLSC6 and integrated-score was evaluated for association with outcome in one of the largest assembly of ~3600 AML patients from 10 independent cohorts (1861 pediatric and 1773 adult AML). Patients with high ADE-RS5 had poor outcome in validation cohorts and the previously reported pLSC6 maintained strong significant association in all validation cohorts. For pLSC6/ADE-RS5-integrated-score analysis, using Group-1 (low-scores for ADE-RS5 and pLSC6) as reference, Group-4 (high-scores for ADE-RS5 and pLSC6) showed worst outcome (EFS: p < 0.0001 and OS: p < 0.0001). Groups-2/3 (one high and one low-score) showed intermediate outcome (p < 0.001). Integrated score groups remained an independent predictor of outcome in multivariable-analysis after adjusting for established prognostic factors (EFS: Group 2 vs. 1, HR = 4.68, p < 0.001, Group 3 vs. 1, HR = 3.22, p = 0.01, and Group 4 vs. 1, HR = 7.26, p < 0.001). These results highlight the significant prognostic value of transcriptomics-based scores capturing disease aggressiveness through pLSC6 and drug resistance via ADE-RS5. The pLSC6 stemness score is a significant predictor of outcome and associates with high-risk group features, the ADE-RS5 drug resistance score adds further value, reflecting the clinical utility of simultaneous testing of both for optimizing treatment strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
87
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Online-only and open access, npj Precision Oncology is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to showcasing cutting-edge scientific research in all facets of precision oncology, spanning from fundamental science to translational applications and clinical medicine.
期刊最新文献
Mechanistic insights into lethal hyper progressive disease induced by PD-L1 inhibitor in metastatic urothelial carcinoma FGFR2-fusions define a clinically actionable molecular subset of pancreatic cancer Integrative analysis of pan-cancer single-cell data reveals a tumor ecosystem subtype predicting immunotherapy response Pan-tumor validation of a NGS fraction-based MSI analysis as a predictor of response to Pembrolizumab Proteomics based selection achieves complete response to HER2 therapy in HER2 IHC 0 breast cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1