Francesco Dibitetto, Roberto Castellucci, Pierluigi Russo, Filippo Marino, Filippo Gavi, Mauro Ragonese, Nazario Foschi, Domenico Nigro, Asgar Akhundov, Lorenzo Defidio, Salvatore Sansalone, Luca Cindolo, Mauro DE Dominicis
{"title":"达芬奇和Versius系统腹膜外机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术:首次比较分析。","authors":"Francesco Dibitetto, Roberto Castellucci, Pierluigi Russo, Filippo Marino, Filippo Gavi, Mauro Ragonese, Nazario Foschi, Domenico Nigro, Asgar Akhundov, Lorenzo Defidio, Salvatore Sansalone, Luca Cindolo, Mauro DE Dominicis","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05792-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted surgery (particularly with the da Vinci Surgical System) has revolutionized urological interventions. The advent of the Versius Surgical System introduces a compelling alternative. This study compares outcomes of extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (eRARP) using da Vinci and Versius, presenting the largest case series to date.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 106 consecutive patients undergoing eRARP (July 2021-July 2023) with da Vinci and Versius. Surgical techniques involved extraperitoneal approaches, with a single surgeon ensuring consistency. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and pathology results were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable between da Vinci and Versius groups. While no significant differences were observed in overall operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay, variations were noted in pelvic lymphadenectomy rates and nerve-sparing procedures. Pathology results revealed no significant disparities in International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grades and positive surgical margins. However, a notable difference emerged in pathological N stage, with Versius showing a higher percentage of positive lymph nodes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of da Vinci and Versius in eRARP, representing the largest case series to date. While overall outcomes were similar, nuances in lymphadenectomy rates and Pathological N stage merit attention. Ongoing research and longer-term follow-up will refine our understanding, guiding urological surgeons in optimal robotic system selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by the da Vinci and Versius System: first comparative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Dibitetto, Roberto Castellucci, Pierluigi Russo, Filippo Marino, Filippo Gavi, Mauro Ragonese, Nazario Foschi, Domenico Nigro, Asgar Akhundov, Lorenzo Defidio, Salvatore Sansalone, Luca Cindolo, Mauro DE Dominicis\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05792-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted surgery (particularly with the da Vinci Surgical System) has revolutionized urological interventions. The advent of the Versius Surgical System introduces a compelling alternative. This study compares outcomes of extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (eRARP) using da Vinci and Versius, presenting the largest case series to date.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 106 consecutive patients undergoing eRARP (July 2021-July 2023) with da Vinci and Versius. Surgical techniques involved extraperitoneal approaches, with a single surgeon ensuring consistency. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and pathology results were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable between da Vinci and Versius groups. While no significant differences were observed in overall operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay, variations were noted in pelvic lymphadenectomy rates and nerve-sparing procedures. Pathology results revealed no significant disparities in International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grades and positive surgical margins. However, a notable difference emerged in pathological N stage, with Versius showing a higher percentage of positive lymph nodes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of da Vinci and Versius in eRARP, representing the largest case series to date. While overall outcomes were similar, nuances in lymphadenectomy rates and Pathological N stage merit attention. Ongoing research and longer-term follow-up will refine our understanding, guiding urological surgeons in optimal robotic system selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05792-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05792-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:机器人辅助手术(尤其是达芬奇手术系统)彻底改变了泌尿外科手术。Versius手术系统的出现提供了一个引人注目的替代方案。本研究比较了使用达芬奇和Versius的腹膜外机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(eRARP)的疗效,是迄今为止最大的病例系列:方法:对106例连续接受达芬奇和Versius前列腺癌根治术(2021年7月至2023年7月)的患者进行回顾性分析。手术技术涉及腹膜外入路,由一名外科医生确保一致性。对基线特征、围手术期结果和病理结果进行了分析:达芬奇组和Versius组的基线特征相当。虽然在总体手术时间、估计失血量和住院时间方面没有观察到明显差异,但在盆腔淋巴腺切除率和神经保留手术方面存在差异。病理结果显示,国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)的分级和手术切缘阳性率没有明显差异。然而,病理 N 分期出现了明显差异,Versius 显示阳性淋巴结的比例更高:本研究对达芬奇和Versius在eRARP中的应用进行了全面的比较分析,是迄今为止规模最大的病例系列。虽然总体结果相似,但淋巴结切除率和病理 N 分期的细微差别值得关注。持续的研究和长期的随访将完善我们的认识,指导泌尿外科外科医生选择最佳的机器人系统。
Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by the da Vinci and Versius System: first comparative analysis.
Background: Robotic-assisted surgery (particularly with the da Vinci Surgical System) has revolutionized urological interventions. The advent of the Versius Surgical System introduces a compelling alternative. This study compares outcomes of extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (eRARP) using da Vinci and Versius, presenting the largest case series to date.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 106 consecutive patients undergoing eRARP (July 2021-July 2023) with da Vinci and Versius. Surgical techniques involved extraperitoneal approaches, with a single surgeon ensuring consistency. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and pathology results were analyzed.
Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between da Vinci and Versius groups. While no significant differences were observed in overall operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay, variations were noted in pelvic lymphadenectomy rates and nerve-sparing procedures. Pathology results revealed no significant disparities in International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grades and positive surgical margins. However, a notable difference emerged in pathological N stage, with Versius showing a higher percentage of positive lymph nodes.
Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of da Vinci and Versius in eRARP, representing the largest case series to date. While overall outcomes were similar, nuances in lymphadenectomy rates and Pathological N stage merit attention. Ongoing research and longer-term follow-up will refine our understanding, guiding urological surgeons in optimal robotic system selection.