抗纤维化药物对非 IPF 进行性纤维化 ILD 的临床疗效和不良反应的系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart & Lung Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.07.010
{"title":"抗纤维化药物对非 IPF 进行性纤维化 ILD 的临床疗效和不良反应的系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Anti-fibrotics can reduce restrictive impairment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, its effectiveness in non-IPF progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (non-IPF PF-ILD) remains uncertain.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We assess the efficacy and safety of anti-fibrotics pirfenidone and nintedanib versus placebo among non-IPF PF-ILD adult patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Meta-analysis was performed using PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). At respective centers, non-IPF PF-ILD was defined as clinical and radiological findings inconsistent with IPF and greater than 5 % forced vital capacity (FVC) decline, worsening radiological fibrosis or respiratory symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among seven RCTs involving 1,816 non-IPF PF-ILD patients, anti-fibrotics significantly reduced decline in FVC from baseline in milliliters (MD -66.80milliliters; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) and percent predicted (MD -1.80 %; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) compared to placebo. However, severity of FVC decline was less than 10 % (<em>P</em> = 0.33) in both groups. No significant difference in the decline of 6MWD from baseline in meters (<em>P</em> = 0.19) while on anti-fibrotics, although those on pirfenidone had less decline in 6MWD (MD -25.12 m; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) versus placebo. The rates of all-cause mortality (<em>P</em> = 0.34), all-cause hospitalization (<em>P</em> = 0.44), and hospitalization for respiratory etiology (<em>P</em> = 0.06) were comparable in both groups. Adverse events of nausea/vomiting (54.2 % vs. 20.3 %; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), diarrhea (65.2 % vs. 27.6 %; <em>P</em> = 0.02), anorexia/weight loss (23.0 % vs. 7.7 %; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), neurological disorders (20.8 % vs. 12.6 %; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), and events requiring therapy discontinuation were higher (18.4 % vs. 9.9 %; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) in the anti-fibrotic group. Other adverse events of skin (<em>P</em> = 0.18) and respiratory disorders (<em>P</em> = 0.20) were equal.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The advent of anti-fibrotics offers alternative treatment to reduce lung function decline.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55064,"journal":{"name":"Heart & Lung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical benefits and adverse reactions of anti-fibrotics in non-IPF progressive fibrosing ILD\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.07.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Anti-fibrotics can reduce restrictive impairment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, its effectiveness in non-IPF progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (non-IPF PF-ILD) remains uncertain.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We assess the efficacy and safety of anti-fibrotics pirfenidone and nintedanib versus placebo among non-IPF PF-ILD adult patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Meta-analysis was performed using PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). At respective centers, non-IPF PF-ILD was defined as clinical and radiological findings inconsistent with IPF and greater than 5 % forced vital capacity (FVC) decline, worsening radiological fibrosis or respiratory symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among seven RCTs involving 1,816 non-IPF PF-ILD patients, anti-fibrotics significantly reduced decline in FVC from baseline in milliliters (MD -66.80milliliters; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) and percent predicted (MD -1.80 %; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) compared to placebo. However, severity of FVC decline was less than 10 % (<em>P</em> = 0.33) in both groups. No significant difference in the decline of 6MWD from baseline in meters (<em>P</em> = 0.19) while on anti-fibrotics, although those on pirfenidone had less decline in 6MWD (MD -25.12 m; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) versus placebo. The rates of all-cause mortality (<em>P</em> = 0.34), all-cause hospitalization (<em>P</em> = 0.44), and hospitalization for respiratory etiology (<em>P</em> = 0.06) were comparable in both groups. Adverse events of nausea/vomiting (54.2 % vs. 20.3 %; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), diarrhea (65.2 % vs. 27.6 %; <em>P</em> = 0.02), anorexia/weight loss (23.0 % vs. 7.7 %; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), neurological disorders (20.8 % vs. 12.6 %; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), and events requiring therapy discontinuation were higher (18.4 % vs. 9.9 %; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) in the anti-fibrotic group. Other adverse events of skin (<em>P</em> = 0.18) and respiratory disorders (<em>P</em> = 0.20) were equal.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The advent of anti-fibrotics offers alternative treatment to reduce lung function decline.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart & Lung\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart & Lung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956324001377\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart & Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956324001377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗纤维化药物可减轻特发性肺纤维化(IPF)的限制性损伤。然而,其对非 IPF 进行性纤维化间质性肺病(non-IPF PF-ILD)的疗效仍不确定:我们评估了抗纤维化药物吡非尼酮和宁替达尼与安慰剂在非 IPF PF-ILD 成年患者中的疗效和安全性:利用PubMed、SCOPUS和Cochrane数据库进行Meta分析,以确定随机对照试验(RCT)。在各研究中心,非 IPF PF-ILD 的定义是:临床和放射学检查结果与 IPF 不一致、用力呼吸容量(FVC)下降超过 5%、放射学纤维化或呼吸道症状恶化:在涉及1816名非IPF PF-ILD患者的七项研究中,与安慰剂相比,抗纤维化药物显著降低了FVC从基线下降的毫升数(MD -66.80毫升;P < 0.01)和预测百分比(MD -1.80%;P < 0.01)。不过,两组患者的 FVC 下降幅度均小于 10 %(P = 0.33)。与安慰剂相比,服用吡非尼酮的患者 6MWD 的下降幅度较小(MD -25.12 m;P <0.01),但服用抗纤维化药物的患者 6MWD 从基线下降的米数无明显差异(P = 0.19)。两组患者的全因死亡率(P = 0.34)、全因住院率(P = 0.44)和因呼吸系统病因住院率(P = 0.06)相当。恶心/呕吐(54.2% 对 20.3%;P < 0.01)、腹泻(65.2% 对 27.6%;P = 0.02)、厌食/体重减轻(23.0% 对 7.7%;P < 0.01)、神经系统紊乱(20.8 % vs. 12.6 %;P < 0.01)和需要中断治疗的事件在抗纤维化组更高(18.4 % vs. 9.9 %;P < 0.01)。皮肤(P = 0.18)和呼吸系统疾病(P = 0.20)等其他不良事件的发生率相同:抗纤维化药物的出现为减少肺功能衰退提供了替代治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical benefits and adverse reactions of anti-fibrotics in non-IPF progressive fibrosing ILD

Background

Anti-fibrotics can reduce restrictive impairment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, its effectiveness in non-IPF progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (non-IPF PF-ILD) remains uncertain.

Objective

We assess the efficacy and safety of anti-fibrotics pirfenidone and nintedanib versus placebo among non-IPF PF-ILD adult patients.

Methods

Meta-analysis was performed using PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). At respective centers, non-IPF PF-ILD was defined as clinical and radiological findings inconsistent with IPF and greater than 5 % forced vital capacity (FVC) decline, worsening radiological fibrosis or respiratory symptoms.

Results

Among seven RCTs involving 1,816 non-IPF PF-ILD patients, anti-fibrotics significantly reduced decline in FVC from baseline in milliliters (MD -66.80milliliters; P < 0.01) and percent predicted (MD -1.80 %; P < 0.01) compared to placebo. However, severity of FVC decline was less than 10 % (P = 0.33) in both groups. No significant difference in the decline of 6MWD from baseline in meters (P = 0.19) while on anti-fibrotics, although those on pirfenidone had less decline in 6MWD (MD -25.12 m; P < 0.01) versus placebo. The rates of all-cause mortality (P = 0.34), all-cause hospitalization (P = 0.44), and hospitalization for respiratory etiology (P = 0.06) were comparable in both groups. Adverse events of nausea/vomiting (54.2 % vs. 20.3 %; P < 0.01), diarrhea (65.2 % vs. 27.6 %; P = 0.02), anorexia/weight loss (23.0 % vs. 7.7 %; P < 0.01), neurological disorders (20.8 % vs. 12.6 %; P < 0.01), and events requiring therapy discontinuation were higher (18.4 % vs. 9.9 %; P < 0.01) in the anti-fibrotic group. Other adverse events of skin (P = 0.18) and respiratory disorders (P = 0.20) were equal.

Conclusion

The advent of anti-fibrotics offers alternative treatment to reduce lung function decline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart & Lung
Heart & Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
184
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care, the official publication of The American Association of Heart Failure Nurses, presents original, peer-reviewed articles on techniques, advances, investigations, and observations related to the care of patients with acute and critical illness and patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disorders. The Journal''s acute care articles focus on the care of hospitalized patients, including those in the critical and acute care settings. Because most patients who are hospitalized in acute and critical care settings have chronic conditions, we are also interested in the chronically critically ill, the care of patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disorders, their rehabilitation, and disease prevention. The Journal''s heart failure articles focus on all aspects of the care of patients with this condition. Manuscripts that are relevant to populations across the human lifespan are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcomes following aortic valve replacement in bioprosthetic vs mechanical valves. Effects of intubation and hypoxemia on intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants during the first week: An observational study. Association between diet-derived antioxidants and asthma: Insights from the NHANES survey 2003-2018 and Mendelian randomization analysis. Effectiveness and safety of emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis The effects of exercise-based prehabilitation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1