分期双侧全膝关节置换术的 MCID 成效:两个关节都一样吗?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Knee Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.013
Amy Z. Blackburn , Akhil Katakam , Ikechukwu Amakiri , Ashish Mittal , Hany S. Bedair , Christopher M. Melnic
{"title":"分期双侧全膝关节置换术的 MCID 成效:两个关节都一样吗?","authors":"Amy Z. Blackburn ,&nbsp;Akhil Katakam ,&nbsp;Ikechukwu Amakiri ,&nbsp;Ashish Mittal ,&nbsp;Hany S. Bedair ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Melnic","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A notable portion of unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients undergo arthroplasty of the contralateral knee. The aims of this study were to describe the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Improvement (MCID-I) and Worsening (MCID-W) in staged bilateral TKAs (BTKAs) and identify factors associated with these outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with staged BTKA were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, surgery details, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 10a (PROMIS PF10a) were collected. MCID-I and MCID-W were defined for PROMIS PF10a. Patients were stratified into nine groups based on the MCID achievement of the first and second TKA: (A) MCID-I, MCID- I, (B) MCID-I, Neutral, (C) MCID-I, MCID-W, (D) Neutral, MCID-I, (E) Neutral, Neutral, (F) Neutral, MCID-W, (G) MCID- W, MCID-I, (H) MCID-W, Neutral, (I) MCID-W, MCID-W. Neutral patients did not achieve either MCID-I or MCID-W.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The final cohort consisted of 59 staged BTKA patients. In patients who achieved MCID-I in the first TKA, 39.1% achieved MCID-I again in the second TKA (A), 39.1% were neutral (B), and 21.7% achieved MCID-W (C) in the second TKA. However, 77.8% of those who achieved MCID-W in the first joint (n = 9) went on to achieve MCID-I (G) in the second TKA. Those who achieved MCID-I after both TKAs (A) had a longer staged interval than those who achieved first MCID-I, then MCID-W (C) (15 months vs 8 months, P = 0.0113).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In staged BTKA, MCID achievement of the first TKA may not be associated with the outcome of the second TKA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"50 ","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MCID achievement in staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty: Are both joints created equal?\",\"authors\":\"Amy Z. Blackburn ,&nbsp;Akhil Katakam ,&nbsp;Ikechukwu Amakiri ,&nbsp;Ashish Mittal ,&nbsp;Hany S. Bedair ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Melnic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A notable portion of unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients undergo arthroplasty of the contralateral knee. The aims of this study were to describe the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Improvement (MCID-I) and Worsening (MCID-W) in staged bilateral TKAs (BTKAs) and identify factors associated with these outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with staged BTKA were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, surgery details, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 10a (PROMIS PF10a) were collected. MCID-I and MCID-W were defined for PROMIS PF10a. Patients were stratified into nine groups based on the MCID achievement of the first and second TKA: (A) MCID-I, MCID- I, (B) MCID-I, Neutral, (C) MCID-I, MCID-W, (D) Neutral, MCID-I, (E) Neutral, Neutral, (F) Neutral, MCID-W, (G) MCID- W, MCID-I, (H) MCID-W, Neutral, (I) MCID-W, MCID-W. Neutral patients did not achieve either MCID-I or MCID-W.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The final cohort consisted of 59 staged BTKA patients. In patients who achieved MCID-I in the first TKA, 39.1% achieved MCID-I again in the second TKA (A), 39.1% were neutral (B), and 21.7% achieved MCID-W (C) in the second TKA. However, 77.8% of those who achieved MCID-W in the first joint (n = 9) went on to achieve MCID-I (G) in the second TKA. Those who achieved MCID-I after both TKAs (A) had a longer staged interval than those who achieved first MCID-I, then MCID-W (C) (15 months vs 8 months, P = 0.0113).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In staged BTKA, MCID achievement of the first TKA may not be associated with the outcome of the second TKA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001121\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:相当一部分单侧全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者会接受对侧膝关节置换术。本研究的目的是描述分期双侧 TKA(BTKA)中改善(MCID-I)和恶化(MCID-W)的最小临床意义差异,并确定与这些结果相关的因素:对分期 BTKA 患者进行回顾性研究。方法:对分期 BTKA 患者进行了回顾性研究,收集了患者的人口统计学资料、手术细节和患者报告结果测量信息系统身体功能简表 10a(PROMIS PF10a)。对 PROMIS PF10a 的 MCID-I 和 MCID-W 进行了定义。根据第一次和第二次TKA的MCID结果将患者分为九组:(A)MCID-I、MCID-I;(B)MCID-I、中性;(C)MCID-I、MCID-W;(D)中性、MCID-I;(E)中性、中性;(F)中性、MCID-W;(G)MCID-W、MCID-I;(H)MCID-W、中性;(I)MCID-W、MCID-W。中性患者既未达到 MCID-I 也未达到 MCID-W:最终队列由 59 名分期 BTKA 患者组成。在第一次 TKA 中达到 MCID-I 的患者中,39.1% 在第二次 TKA 中再次达到 MCID-I(A),39.1% 为中性(B),21.7% 在第二次 TKA 中达到 MCID-W(C)。然而,在第一次关节置换中达到 MCID-W 的患者(9 人)中,77.8% 在第二次关节置换中达到 MCID-I (G)。与先达到 MCID-I 后达到 MCID-W(C)的患者(15 个月 vs 8 个月,P = 0.0113)相比,两次 TKA 都达到 MCID-I 的患者(A)的分期间隔时间更长:结论:在分期 BTKA 中,第一次 TKA 达到 MCID 可能与第二次 TKA 的结果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MCID achievement in staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty: Are both joints created equal?

Background

A notable portion of unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients undergo arthroplasty of the contralateral knee. The aims of this study were to describe the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Improvement (MCID-I) and Worsening (MCID-W) in staged bilateral TKAs (BTKAs) and identify factors associated with these outcomes.

Methods

Patients with staged BTKA were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, surgery details, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 10a (PROMIS PF10a) were collected. MCID-I and MCID-W were defined for PROMIS PF10a. Patients were stratified into nine groups based on the MCID achievement of the first and second TKA: (A) MCID-I, MCID- I, (B) MCID-I, Neutral, (C) MCID-I, MCID-W, (D) Neutral, MCID-I, (E) Neutral, Neutral, (F) Neutral, MCID-W, (G) MCID- W, MCID-I, (H) MCID-W, Neutral, (I) MCID-W, MCID-W. Neutral patients did not achieve either MCID-I or MCID-W.

Results

The final cohort consisted of 59 staged BTKA patients. In patients who achieved MCID-I in the first TKA, 39.1% achieved MCID-I again in the second TKA (A), 39.1% were neutral (B), and 21.7% achieved MCID-W (C) in the second TKA. However, 77.8% of those who achieved MCID-W in the first joint (n = 9) went on to achieve MCID-I (G) in the second TKA. Those who achieved MCID-I after both TKAs (A) had a longer staged interval than those who achieved first MCID-I, then MCID-W (C) (15 months vs 8 months, P = 0.0113).

Conclusion

In staged BTKA, MCID achievement of the first TKA may not be associated with the outcome of the second TKA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Knee
Knee 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee. The topics covered include, but are not limited to: • Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry; • Biomechanical studies; • Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices; • Imaging and diagnostic techniques; • Pathology; • Trauma; • Surgery; • Rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
SPECT-CT may aid in determining which side of a revision stemmed implant problematic total knee replacement is loose when planning revision surgery The third gap – The forgotten space in total knee arthroplasty Biomechanical differences of Asian knee osteoarthritis patients during standing and walking using statistical parametric mapping: A cross-sectional study Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs influence cartilage healing Patellar tendon–Hoffa fat pad interface: From anatomy to high-resolution ultrasound imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1