从敌人到朋友:重新思考淋巴结在前列腺癌中的作用

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Nature Reviews Urology Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1038/s41585-024-00912-9
Raghav Gupta, Chandan K. Das, Sujit S. Nair, Adriana Marcela Pedraza-Bermeo, Ali H. Zahalka, Natasha Kyprianou, Nina Bhardwaj, Ashutosh K. Tewari
{"title":"从敌人到朋友:重新思考淋巴结在前列腺癌中的作用","authors":"Raghav Gupta, Chandan K. Das, Sujit S. Nair, Adriana Marcela Pedraza-Bermeo, Ali H. Zahalka, Natasha Kyprianou, Nina Bhardwaj, Ashutosh K. Tewari","doi":"10.1038/s41585-024-00912-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinically localized prostate cancer is often treated with radical prostatectomy combined with pelvic lymph node dissection. Data suggest that lymph node dissection does improve disease staging, but its therapeutic value has often been debated, with few studies showing that lymph node removal directly improves oncological outcomes; however, lymph nodes are an important first site of antigen recognition and immune system activation and the success of many currently used immunological therapies hinges on this dogma. Evidence, particularly in the preclinical setting, has demonstrated that the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors is dampened by the removal of tumour-draining lymph nodes. Thus, whether lymph nodes are truly ‘foes’ or whether they are actually ‘friends’ in oncological care is an important idea to discuss. Pelvic lymph node dissection is performed for staging and to prevent recurrence of prostate cancer; however, immune checkpoint inhibition could be affected by lymph node removal. Here, the authors discuss the possibility that lymph nodes could be ‘friends’ rather than ‘foes’ in prostate cancer treatment.","PeriodicalId":19088,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From foes to friends: rethinking the role of lymph nodes in prostate cancer\",\"authors\":\"Raghav Gupta, Chandan K. Das, Sujit S. Nair, Adriana Marcela Pedraza-Bermeo, Ali H. Zahalka, Natasha Kyprianou, Nina Bhardwaj, Ashutosh K. Tewari\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41585-024-00912-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinically localized prostate cancer is often treated with radical prostatectomy combined with pelvic lymph node dissection. Data suggest that lymph node dissection does improve disease staging, but its therapeutic value has often been debated, with few studies showing that lymph node removal directly improves oncological outcomes; however, lymph nodes are an important first site of antigen recognition and immune system activation and the success of many currently used immunological therapies hinges on this dogma. Evidence, particularly in the preclinical setting, has demonstrated that the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors is dampened by the removal of tumour-draining lymph nodes. Thus, whether lymph nodes are truly ‘foes’ or whether they are actually ‘friends’ in oncological care is an important idea to discuss. Pelvic lymph node dissection is performed for staging and to prevent recurrence of prostate cancer; however, immune checkpoint inhibition could be affected by lymph node removal. Here, the authors discuss the possibility that lymph nodes could be ‘friends’ rather than ‘foes’ in prostate cancer treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41585-024-00912-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41585-024-00912-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床上,局部前列腺癌通常采用根治性前列腺切除术结合盆腔淋巴结清扫术进行治疗。数据表明,淋巴结清扫术确实能改善疾病分期,但其治疗价值却经常受到争议,很少有研究表明淋巴结切除能直接改善肿瘤预后;然而,淋巴结是抗原识别和免疫系统激活的重要第一站,目前使用的许多免疫疗法的成功都有赖于这一信条。有证据表明,尤其是临床前的证据表明,免疫检查点抑制剂的成功会受到切除肿瘤淋巴结的影响。因此,淋巴结在肿瘤治疗中究竟是 "敌人 "还是 "朋友 "是一个值得讨论的重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From foes to friends: rethinking the role of lymph nodes in prostate cancer
Clinically localized prostate cancer is often treated with radical prostatectomy combined with pelvic lymph node dissection. Data suggest that lymph node dissection does improve disease staging, but its therapeutic value has often been debated, with few studies showing that lymph node removal directly improves oncological outcomes; however, lymph nodes are an important first site of antigen recognition and immune system activation and the success of many currently used immunological therapies hinges on this dogma. Evidence, particularly in the preclinical setting, has demonstrated that the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors is dampened by the removal of tumour-draining lymph nodes. Thus, whether lymph nodes are truly ‘foes’ or whether they are actually ‘friends’ in oncological care is an important idea to discuss. Pelvic lymph node dissection is performed for staging and to prevent recurrence of prostate cancer; however, immune checkpoint inhibition could be affected by lymph node removal. Here, the authors discuss the possibility that lymph nodes could be ‘friends’ rather than ‘foes’ in prostate cancer treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Urology
Nature Reviews Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Urology is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals.Nature Reviews' basic, translational and clinical content is written by internationally renowned basic and clinical academics and researchers. This journal targeted readers in the biological and medical sciences, from the postgraduate level upwards, aiming to be accessible to professionals in any biological or medical discipline. The journal features authoritative In-depth Reviews providing up-to-date information on topics within a field's history and development. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section offer topical discussions and opinions, filtering primary research from various medical journals. Covering a wide range of subjects, including andrology, urologic oncology, and imaging, Nature Reviews provides valuable insights for practitioners, researchers, and academics within urology and related fields.
期刊最新文献
Prostate cancer in transgender women — challenges in research and clinical care Pre-treatment metastatic biopsy: a step towards precision oncology for urothelial cancer 20 years of ‘spilling the tea’ in urology Author Correction: Metaverse in surgery - origins and future potential. Racial disparities in prostate cancer in the UK and the USA: similarities, differences and steps forwards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1