基于深度学习的颈椎 CTA 自动骨质移除算法的图像质量评估

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1097/RCT.0000000000001637
Yuanyuan Cui, Rongrong Fan, Yuxin Cheng, An Sun, Zhoubing Xu, Michael Schwier, Linfeng Li, Shushen Lin, Max Schoebinger, Yi Xiao, Shiyuan Liu
{"title":"基于深度学习的颈椎 CTA 自动骨质移除算法的图像质量评估","authors":"Yuanyuan Cui, Rongrong Fan, Yuxin Cheng, An Sun, Zhoubing Xu, Michael Schwier, Linfeng Li, Shushen Lin, Max Schoebinger, Yi Xiao, Shiyuan Liu","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study aims to evaluate the postprocessing image quality of a deep-learning (DL)-based automatic bone removal algorithm in the real clinical practice for cervical computed tomography angiography (CTA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients (31 females, 61.4 ± 12.4 years old) who had performed cervical CTA from January 2022 to July 2022 were included retrospectively. Three different types of scanners were used. Ipsilateral cervical artery was divided into 10 segments. The performance of the DL algorithm and conventional algorithm in terms of bone removal and vascular integrity was independently evaluated by two radiologists for each segment. The difference in the performance between the two algorithms was compared. Inter- and intrarater consistency were assessed, and the correlation between the degree of carotid artery stenosis and the rank of bone removal and vascular integrity was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in the rankings of bone removal and vascular integrity between the two algorithms on most segments on both sides. Compared to DL algorithm, the conventional algorithm showed a higher correlation between the degree of carotid artery stenosis and vascular integrity (r = -0.264 vs r = -0.180). The inter- and intrarater consistency of DL algorithm were found to be higher than or equal to those of conventional algorithm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DL algorithm for bone removal in cervical CTA demonstrated significantly better performance than conventional postprocessing method, particularly in the segments with complex anatomical structures and adjacent to bone.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image Quality Assessment of a Deep Learning-Based Automatic Bone Removal Algorithm for Cervical CTA.\",\"authors\":\"Yuanyuan Cui, Rongrong Fan, Yuxin Cheng, An Sun, Zhoubing Xu, Michael Schwier, Linfeng Li, Shushen Lin, Max Schoebinger, Yi Xiao, Shiyuan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study aims to evaluate the postprocessing image quality of a deep-learning (DL)-based automatic bone removal algorithm in the real clinical practice for cervical computed tomography angiography (CTA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients (31 females, 61.4 ± 12.4 years old) who had performed cervical CTA from January 2022 to July 2022 were included retrospectively. Three different types of scanners were used. Ipsilateral cervical artery was divided into 10 segments. The performance of the DL algorithm and conventional algorithm in terms of bone removal and vascular integrity was independently evaluated by two radiologists for each segment. The difference in the performance between the two algorithms was compared. Inter- and intrarater consistency were assessed, and the correlation between the degree of carotid artery stenosis and the rank of bone removal and vascular integrity was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in the rankings of bone removal and vascular integrity between the two algorithms on most segments on both sides. Compared to DL algorithm, the conventional algorithm showed a higher correlation between the degree of carotid artery stenosis and vascular integrity (r = -0.264 vs r = -0.180). The inter- and intrarater consistency of DL algorithm were found to be higher than or equal to those of conventional algorithm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DL algorithm for bone removal in cervical CTA demonstrated significantly better performance than conventional postprocessing method, particularly in the segments with complex anatomical structures and adjacent to bone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001637\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001637","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估基于深度学习(DL)的颈椎计算机断层扫描(CTA)自动去骨算法在实际临床实践中的后处理图像质量:回顾性纳入2022年1月至2022年7月期间进行过颈椎CTA检查的100名患者(31名女性,61.4±12.4岁)。使用了三种不同类型的扫描仪。同侧颈动脉被分为 10 段。由两名放射科医生对每个节段的DL算法和传统算法在骨切除和血管完整性方面的性能进行独立评估。比较了两种算法的性能差异。评估了两者之间的一致性,并分析了颈动脉狭窄程度与骨切除和血管完整性排名之间的相关性:结果:两种算法在两侧大部分节段的骨切除和血管完整性排名上存在显著差异。与 DL 算法相比,传统算法在颈动脉狭窄程度和血管完整性之间显示出更高的相关性(r = -0.264 vs r = -0.180)。结论:结论:DL算法在颈椎CTA中的骨质去除效果明显优于传统的后处理方法,尤其是在解剖结构复杂和邻近骨质的节段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Image Quality Assessment of a Deep Learning-Based Automatic Bone Removal Algorithm for Cervical CTA.

Background: The present study aims to evaluate the postprocessing image quality of a deep-learning (DL)-based automatic bone removal algorithm in the real clinical practice for cervical computed tomography angiography (CTA).

Materials and methods: A total of 100 patients (31 females, 61.4 ± 12.4 years old) who had performed cervical CTA from January 2022 to July 2022 were included retrospectively. Three different types of scanners were used. Ipsilateral cervical artery was divided into 10 segments. The performance of the DL algorithm and conventional algorithm in terms of bone removal and vascular integrity was independently evaluated by two radiologists for each segment. The difference in the performance between the two algorithms was compared. Inter- and intrarater consistency were assessed, and the correlation between the degree of carotid artery stenosis and the rank of bone removal and vascular integrity was analyzed.

Results: Significant differences were observed in the rankings of bone removal and vascular integrity between the two algorithms on most segments on both sides. Compared to DL algorithm, the conventional algorithm showed a higher correlation between the degree of carotid artery stenosis and vascular integrity (r = -0.264 vs r = -0.180). The inter- and intrarater consistency of DL algorithm were found to be higher than or equal to those of conventional algorithm.

Conclusions: The DL algorithm for bone removal in cervical CTA demonstrated significantly better performance than conventional postprocessing method, particularly in the segments with complex anatomical structures and adjacent to bone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging Combined With Serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen for Grading Cervical cancer. Evaluating the Efficacy of Deep Learning Reconstruction in Reducing Radiation Dose for Computer-Aided Volumetry for Liver Tumor: A Phantom Study. Improving Image Quality and Visualization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Arterial Phase Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement-Boost Technique. Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumor and Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: A Report of 5 Cases, Including 2 Skull Base Cases With Arterial Spin Label Perfusion. Application of a Deep Learning-Based Contrast-Boosting Algorithm to Low-Dose Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography With Reduced Iodine Load.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1