共创人文人工智能 AgeTech,支持动态护理生态系统:初步指导模型。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnae093
Amy S Hwang, Thomas Tannou, Jarshini Nanthakumar, Wendy Cao, Charlene H Chu, Ceren Zeytinoglu Atici, Kerseri Scane, Amanda Yu, Winnie Tsang, Jennifer Chan, Paul Lea, Zelda Harris, Rosalie H Wang
{"title":"共创人文人工智能 AgeTech,支持动态护理生态系统:初步指导模型。","authors":"Amy S Hwang, Thomas Tannou, Jarshini Nanthakumar, Wendy Cao, Charlene H Chu, Ceren Zeytinoglu Atici, Kerseri Scane, Amanda Yu, Winnie Tsang, Jennifer Chan, Paul Lea, Zelda Harris, Rosalie H Wang","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As society rapidly digitizes, successful aging necessitates using technology for health and social care and social engagement. Technologies aimed to support older adults (e.g., smart homes, assistive robots, wheelchairs) are increasingly applying artificial intelligence (AI), and thereby creating ethical challenges to technology development and use. The international debate on AI ethics focuses on implications to society (e.g., bias, equity) and to individuals (e.g., privacy, consent). The relational nature of care, however, warrants a humanistic lens to examine how \"AI AgeTech\" will shape, and be shaped by, social networks or care ecosystems in terms of their care actors (i.e., older adults, care partners, service providers); inter-actor relations (e.g., care decision-making) and relationships (e.g., social, professional); and evolving care arrangements. For instance, if an older adult's reduced functioning leads actors to renegotiate their risk tolerances and care routines, smart homes or robots become more than tools that actors configure; they become semi-autonomous actors, in themselves, with the potential to influence functioning and interpersonal relationships. As an experientially-diverse, transdisciplinary working group of older adults, care partners, researchers, clinicians, and entrepreneurs, we co-constructed intersectional care experiences, to guide technology research, development, and use. Our synthesis contributes a preliminary guiding model for AI AgeTech innovation that delineates humanistic attributes, values, and design orientations, and captures the ethical, sociological, and technological nuances of dynamic care ecosystems. Our visual probes and recommended tools and techniques offer researchers, developers/innovators, and care actors concrete ways of using this model to promote successful aging in AI-enabled futures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-creating Humanistic AI AgeTech to Support Dynamic Care Ecosystems: A Preliminary Guiding Model.\",\"authors\":\"Amy S Hwang, Thomas Tannou, Jarshini Nanthakumar, Wendy Cao, Charlene H Chu, Ceren Zeytinoglu Atici, Kerseri Scane, Amanda Yu, Winnie Tsang, Jennifer Chan, Paul Lea, Zelda Harris, Rosalie H Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnae093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As society rapidly digitizes, successful aging necessitates using technology for health and social care and social engagement. Technologies aimed to support older adults (e.g., smart homes, assistive robots, wheelchairs) are increasingly applying artificial intelligence (AI), and thereby creating ethical challenges to technology development and use. The international debate on AI ethics focuses on implications to society (e.g., bias, equity) and to individuals (e.g., privacy, consent). The relational nature of care, however, warrants a humanistic lens to examine how \\\"AI AgeTech\\\" will shape, and be shaped by, social networks or care ecosystems in terms of their care actors (i.e., older adults, care partners, service providers); inter-actor relations (e.g., care decision-making) and relationships (e.g., social, professional); and evolving care arrangements. For instance, if an older adult's reduced functioning leads actors to renegotiate their risk tolerances and care routines, smart homes or robots become more than tools that actors configure; they become semi-autonomous actors, in themselves, with the potential to influence functioning and interpersonal relationships. As an experientially-diverse, transdisciplinary working group of older adults, care partners, researchers, clinicians, and entrepreneurs, we co-constructed intersectional care experiences, to guide technology research, development, and use. Our synthesis contributes a preliminary guiding model for AI AgeTech innovation that delineates humanistic attributes, values, and design orientations, and captures the ethical, sociological, and technological nuances of dynamic care ecosystems. Our visual probes and recommended tools and techniques offer researchers, developers/innovators, and care actors concrete ways of using this model to promote successful aging in AI-enabled futures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae093\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着社会的快速数字化,成功的老龄化需要利用技术来促进健康、社会护理和社会参与。旨在支持老年人的技术(如智能家居、辅助机器人、轮椅)越来越多地应用人工智能(AI),从而给技术开发和使用带来了伦理挑战。国际上关于人工智能伦理的争论主要集中在对社会(如偏见、公平)和个人(如隐私、同意)的影响上。然而,护理的关系性质要求我们从人文角度来审视 "人工智能时代技术 "将如何塑造社会网络或护理生态系统,以及如何被其塑造,包括护理行为者(即老年人、护理伙伴、服务提供者);行为者之间的关系(如护理决策)和关系(如社会、专业);以及不断演变的护理安排。例如,如果老年人的功能减退导致行动者重新谈判他们的风险容忍度和护理常规,那么智能家居或机器人就不仅仅是行动者配置的工具,它们本身就成为半自主的行动者,具有影响功能和人际关系的潜力。作为一个由老年人、护理伙伴、研究人员、临床医生和企业家组成的经验多元化跨学科工作组,我们共同构建了交叉护理经验,以指导技术研究、开发和使用。我们的综合研究为人工智能老年科技创新提供了一个初步的指导模型,该模型界定了人文属性、价值观和设计方向,并捕捉到了动态护理生态系统在伦理、社会学和技术方面的细微差别。我们的可视化探测和推荐的工具与技术为研究人员、开发者/创新者和护理参与者提供了使用该模型的具体方法,以促进人工智能未来的成功老龄化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-creating Humanistic AI AgeTech to Support Dynamic Care Ecosystems: A Preliminary Guiding Model.

As society rapidly digitizes, successful aging necessitates using technology for health and social care and social engagement. Technologies aimed to support older adults (e.g., smart homes, assistive robots, wheelchairs) are increasingly applying artificial intelligence (AI), and thereby creating ethical challenges to technology development and use. The international debate on AI ethics focuses on implications to society (e.g., bias, equity) and to individuals (e.g., privacy, consent). The relational nature of care, however, warrants a humanistic lens to examine how "AI AgeTech" will shape, and be shaped by, social networks or care ecosystems in terms of their care actors (i.e., older adults, care partners, service providers); inter-actor relations (e.g., care decision-making) and relationships (e.g., social, professional); and evolving care arrangements. For instance, if an older adult's reduced functioning leads actors to renegotiate their risk tolerances and care routines, smart homes or robots become more than tools that actors configure; they become semi-autonomous actors, in themselves, with the potential to influence functioning and interpersonal relationships. As an experientially-diverse, transdisciplinary working group of older adults, care partners, researchers, clinicians, and entrepreneurs, we co-constructed intersectional care experiences, to guide technology research, development, and use. Our synthesis contributes a preliminary guiding model for AI AgeTech innovation that delineates humanistic attributes, values, and design orientations, and captures the ethical, sociological, and technological nuances of dynamic care ecosystems. Our visual probes and recommended tools and techniques offer researchers, developers/innovators, and care actors concrete ways of using this model to promote successful aging in AI-enabled futures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between physical capability, social support, loneliness, depression, anxiety, and life satisfaction in older adults. Covid-19 Impacts on Physical Activity among Community-dwelling Older Adults with Memory Problems: The Moderating Role of Walkable Neighborhood Destinations. Finding the Balance to Quiet the Striving: The Difference Between Successful Aging and Wise Aging. Impacts of acculturation on depressive symptoms and activities of daily living of U.S. older Chinese immigrants. Later-Life Creativity and Successful Aging in Neoliberal Agendas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1