人工智能肺栓塞检测工具的性能和临床实用性。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110245
{"title":"人工智能肺栓塞检测工具的性能和临床实用性。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) is still challenging due to other conditions that can mimic its appearance, leading to incomplete or delayed management and several inter-observer variabilities. This study evaluated the performance and clinical utility of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application designed to assist clinicians in the detection of PE on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>CTPAs from 230 US cities acquired on 57 scanner models from 6 different vendors were retrospectively collected. Three US board certified expert radiologists defined the ground truth by majority agreement. The same cases were analyzed by CINA-PE, an AI-driven algorithm capable of detecting and highlighting suspected PE locations. The algorithm's performance at a per-case and per-finding level was evaluated. Furthermore, cases with PE not mentioned in the clinical report but correctly detected by the algorithm were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1204 CTPAs (mean age 62.1 years ± 16.6[SD], 44.4 % female, 14.9 % positive) were included in the study. Per-case sensitivity and specificity were 93.9 % (95%CI: 89.3 %–96.9 %) and 94.8 % (95%CI: 93.3 %–96.1 %), respectively. Per-finding positive predictive value was 89.5 % (95%CI: 86.7 %–91.9 %). Among the 196 positive cases, 29 (15.6 %) were not mentioned in the clinical report. The algorithm detected 22/29 (76 %) of these cases, leading to a reduction in the miss rate from 15.6 % to 3.8 % (7/186).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The AI-based application may improve diagnostic accuracy in detecting PE and enhance patient outcomes through timely intervention. Integrating AI tools in clinical workflows can reduce missed or delayed diagnoses, and positively impact healthcare delivery and patient care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089970712400175X/pdfft?md5=6f32751893e16d83572151d1ac3ccb66&pid=1-s2.0-S089970712400175X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance and clinical utility of an artificial intelligence-enabled tool for pulmonary embolism detection\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) is still challenging due to other conditions that can mimic its appearance, leading to incomplete or delayed management and several inter-observer variabilities. This study evaluated the performance and clinical utility of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application designed to assist clinicians in the detection of PE on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>CTPAs from 230 US cities acquired on 57 scanner models from 6 different vendors were retrospectively collected. Three US board certified expert radiologists defined the ground truth by majority agreement. The same cases were analyzed by CINA-PE, an AI-driven algorithm capable of detecting and highlighting suspected PE locations. The algorithm's performance at a per-case and per-finding level was evaluated. Furthermore, cases with PE not mentioned in the clinical report but correctly detected by the algorithm were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1204 CTPAs (mean age 62.1 years ± 16.6[SD], 44.4 % female, 14.9 % positive) were included in the study. Per-case sensitivity and specificity were 93.9 % (95%CI: 89.3 %–96.9 %) and 94.8 % (95%CI: 93.3 %–96.1 %), respectively. Per-finding positive predictive value was 89.5 % (95%CI: 86.7 %–91.9 %). Among the 196 positive cases, 29 (15.6 %) were not mentioned in the clinical report. The algorithm detected 22/29 (76 %) of these cases, leading to a reduction in the miss rate from 15.6 % to 3.8 % (7/186).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The AI-based application may improve diagnostic accuracy in detecting PE and enhance patient outcomes through timely intervention. Integrating AI tools in clinical workflows can reduce missed or delayed diagnoses, and positively impact healthcare delivery and patient care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089970712400175X/pdfft?md5=6f32751893e16d83572151d1ac3ccb66&pid=1-s2.0-S089970712400175X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089970712400175X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089970712400175X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肺栓塞(PE)的诊断仍然具有挑战性,因为其他疾病可能会模仿其外观,导致治疗不彻底或延迟,以及观察者之间的差异。本研究评估了一款基于人工智能(AI)的应用程序的性能和临床实用性,该应用程序旨在协助临床医生通过 CT 肺血管造影(CTPA)检测肺栓塞:回顾性收集了美国 230 个城市通过 6 个不同供应商的 57 种型号扫描仪获得的 CTPA。三位美国放射学委员会认证的专家以多数同意的方式确定了基本真实值。CINA-PE 是一种人工智能驱动的算法,能够检测并突出显示疑似 PE 位置。对算法在每个病例和每个发现层面的性能进行了评估。此外,还对临床报告中未提及但算法正确检测出 PE 的病例进行了分析:研究共纳入了1204例CTPA(平均年龄62.1岁±16.6[SD],44.4%为女性,14.9%为阳性)。每例敏感性和特异性分别为 93.9 %(95%CI:89.3 %-96.9 %)和 94.8 %(95%CI:93.3 %-96.1 %)。每次发现的阳性预测值为 89.5 %(95%CI:86.7 %-91.9 %)。在 196 例阳性病例中,有 29 例(15.6%)在临床报告中未提及。算法检测出了其中的 22/29(76%)个病例,使漏诊率从 15.6% 降至 3.8%(7/186):基于人工智能的应用可提高检测 PE 的诊断准确性,并通过及时干预改善患者预后。在临床工作流程中整合人工智能工具可减少漏诊或延误诊断,并对医疗服务和患者护理产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance and clinical utility of an artificial intelligence-enabled tool for pulmonary embolism detection

Purpose

Diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) is still challenging due to other conditions that can mimic its appearance, leading to incomplete or delayed management and several inter-observer variabilities. This study evaluated the performance and clinical utility of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application designed to assist clinicians in the detection of PE on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA).

Patients and methods

CTPAs from 230 US cities acquired on 57 scanner models from 6 different vendors were retrospectively collected. Three US board certified expert radiologists defined the ground truth by majority agreement. The same cases were analyzed by CINA-PE, an AI-driven algorithm capable of detecting and highlighting suspected PE locations. The algorithm's performance at a per-case and per-finding level was evaluated. Furthermore, cases with PE not mentioned in the clinical report but correctly detected by the algorithm were analyzed.

Results

A total of 1204 CTPAs (mean age 62.1 years ± 16.6[SD], 44.4 % female, 14.9 % positive) were included in the study. Per-case sensitivity and specificity were 93.9 % (95%CI: 89.3 %–96.9 %) and 94.8 % (95%CI: 93.3 %–96.1 %), respectively. Per-finding positive predictive value was 89.5 % (95%CI: 86.7 %–91.9 %). Among the 196 positive cases, 29 (15.6 %) were not mentioned in the clinical report. The algorithm detected 22/29 (76 %) of these cases, leading to a reduction in the miss rate from 15.6 % to 3.8 % (7/186).

Conclusions

The AI-based application may improve diagnostic accuracy in detecting PE and enhance patient outcomes through timely intervention. Integrating AI tools in clinical workflows can reduce missed or delayed diagnoses, and positively impact healthcare delivery and patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
期刊最新文献
Women in Radiology Education (WIRED): An actionable step towards closing the gender gap in radiology. Contents Heart lung axis in acute pulmonary embolism: Role of CT in risk stratification Clinical experience on the limited role of ultrasound for breast cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carriers aged 30–39 years Factors affecting mammogram breast cancer surveillance effectiveness in the ipsilateral and contralateral breast
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1