{"title":"普遍适用的基于物理学的液体状态方程。","authors":"J E Proctor, Kostya Trachenko","doi":"10.1088/1361-6633/ad6a80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physics-based first-principles pressure-volume-temperature equations of state (EOS) exist for solids and gases but not for liquids due to the long-standing fundamental problems involved in liquid theory. Current EOS models that are applicable to liquids and supercritical fluids at liquid-like density under conditions relevant to planetary interiors and industrial processes are complex empirical models with many physically meaningless adjustable parameters. Here, we develop a generally applicable physics-based (GAP) EOS for liquids including supercritical fluids at liquid-like density. The GAP equation is explicit in the internal energy, and hence links the most fundamental macroscopic static property of fluids, the pressure-volume-temperature EOS, to their key microscopic property: the molecular hopping frequency or liquid relaxation time, from which the internal energy can be obtained. We test our GAP equation against available experimental data in several different ways and find good agreement. Our GAP equation, unavoidably and similarly to solid EOS, contains a semi-empirical term giving the energy of the static sample as a function of volume only (EST(V)). Our testing includes studies along isochores, in order to examine the validity of the GAP equation independently of the validity of any function we may choose to utilize forEST(V). The only other adjustable parameter in the equation is the Grüneisen parameter for the fluid. We observe that the GAP equation is similar to the Mie-Grüneisen solid EOS in a wide range of the liquid phase diagram. This similarity is ultimately related to the condensed state of these two phases. On the other hand, the differences between the GAP equation and EOS for gases are fundamental. Finally, we identify the key gaps in the experimental data that need to be filled in to proceed further with the liquid EOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":74666,"journal":{"name":"Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generally applicable physics-based equation of state for liquids.\",\"authors\":\"J E Proctor, Kostya Trachenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6633/ad6a80\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Physics-based first-principles pressure-volume-temperature equations of state (EOS) exist for solids and gases but not for liquids due to the long-standing fundamental problems involved in liquid theory. Current EOS models that are applicable to liquids and supercritical fluids at liquid-like density under conditions relevant to planetary interiors and industrial processes are complex empirical models with many physically meaningless adjustable parameters. Here, we develop a generally applicable physics-based (GAP) EOS for liquids including supercritical fluids at liquid-like density. The GAP equation is explicit in the internal energy, and hence links the most fundamental macroscopic static property of fluids, the pressure-volume-temperature EOS, to their key microscopic property: the molecular hopping frequency or liquid relaxation time, from which the internal energy can be obtained. We test our GAP equation against available experimental data in several different ways and find good agreement. Our GAP equation, unavoidably and similarly to solid EOS, contains a semi-empirical term giving the energy of the static sample as a function of volume only (EST(V)). Our testing includes studies along isochores, in order to examine the validity of the GAP equation independently of the validity of any function we may choose to utilize forEST(V). The only other adjustable parameter in the equation is the Grüneisen parameter for the fluid. We observe that the GAP equation is similar to the Mie-Grüneisen solid EOS in a wide range of the liquid phase diagram. This similarity is ultimately related to the condensed state of these two phases. On the other hand, the differences between the GAP equation and EOS for gases are fundamental. Finally, we identify the key gaps in the experimental data that need to be filled in to proceed further with the liquid EOS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ad6a80\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ad6a80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
基于物理学的第一原理压力-体积-温度状态方程(EOS)适用于固体和气体,但不适用于液体,原因是液体理论中长期存在一些基本问题。目前适用于行星内部和工业过程相关条件下类似液体密度的液体和超临界流体的 EOS 模型都是复杂的经验模型,其中包含许多无物理意义的可调参数。在这里,我们为液体(包括类液态密度下的超临界流体)开发了一种基于物理学的通用(GAP)EOS。GAP 方程明确了内能,从而将流体最基本的宏观静态特性--压力-体积-温度 EOS,与其关键的微观特性--分子跳跃频率或液体弛豫时间联系起来,并从中获得内能。我们用几种不同的方法将我们的 GAP 方程与现有的实验数据进行了对比测试,结果发现两者非常吻合。与固体 EOS 相似,我们的 GAP 方程不可避免地包含了一个半经验项,它给出了静态样品的能量与体积的函数关系(EST(V))。我们的测试包括沿等距线进行的研究,以检验 GAP 方程的有效性,而不考虑我们可能选择用于 EST(V)的任何函数的有效性。方程中唯一可调整的参数是流体的格吕奈森参数。我们观察到,在液相图的很大范围内,GAP 方程与 Mie-Grüneisen 固体 EOS 相似。这种相似性归根结底与这两种物质的凝聚态有关。另一方面,GAP 方程与气体 EOS 之间的差异是根本性的。最后,我们指出了实验数据中需要填补的关键空白,以便进一步研究液态 EOS。
Generally applicable physics-based equation of state for liquids.
Physics-based first-principles pressure-volume-temperature equations of state (EOS) exist for solids and gases but not for liquids due to the long-standing fundamental problems involved in liquid theory. Current EOS models that are applicable to liquids and supercritical fluids at liquid-like density under conditions relevant to planetary interiors and industrial processes are complex empirical models with many physically meaningless adjustable parameters. Here, we develop a generally applicable physics-based (GAP) EOS for liquids including supercritical fluids at liquid-like density. The GAP equation is explicit in the internal energy, and hence links the most fundamental macroscopic static property of fluids, the pressure-volume-temperature EOS, to their key microscopic property: the molecular hopping frequency or liquid relaxation time, from which the internal energy can be obtained. We test our GAP equation against available experimental data in several different ways and find good agreement. Our GAP equation, unavoidably and similarly to solid EOS, contains a semi-empirical term giving the energy of the static sample as a function of volume only (EST(V)). Our testing includes studies along isochores, in order to examine the validity of the GAP equation independently of the validity of any function we may choose to utilize forEST(V). The only other adjustable parameter in the equation is the Grüneisen parameter for the fluid. We observe that the GAP equation is similar to the Mie-Grüneisen solid EOS in a wide range of the liquid phase diagram. This similarity is ultimately related to the condensed state of these two phases. On the other hand, the differences between the GAP equation and EOS for gases are fundamental. Finally, we identify the key gaps in the experimental data that need to be filled in to proceed further with the liquid EOS.