普遍适用的基于物理学的液体状态方程。

J E Proctor, Kostya Trachenko
{"title":"普遍适用的基于物理学的液体状态方程。","authors":"J E Proctor, Kostya Trachenko","doi":"10.1088/1361-6633/ad6a80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physics-based first-principles pressure-volume-temperature equations of state (EOS) exist for solids and gases but not for liquids due to the long-standing fundamental problems involved in liquid theory. Current EOS models that are applicable to liquids and supercritical fluids at liquid-like density under conditions relevant to planetary interiors and industrial processes are complex empirical models with many physically meaningless adjustable parameters. Here, we develop a generally applicable physics-based (GAP) EOS for liquids including supercritical fluids at liquid-like density. The GAP equation is explicit in the internal energy, and hence links the most fundamental macroscopic static property of fluids, the pressure-volume-temperature EOS, to their key microscopic property: the molecular hopping frequency or liquid relaxation time, from which the internal energy can be obtained. We test our GAP equation against available experimental data in several different ways and find good agreement. Our GAP equation, unavoidably and similarly to solid EOS, contains a semi-empirical term giving the energy of the static sample as a function of volume only (EST(V)). Our testing includes studies along isochores, in order to examine the validity of the GAP equation independently of the validity of any function we may choose to utilize forEST(V). The only other adjustable parameter in the equation is the Grüneisen parameter for the fluid. We observe that the GAP equation is similar to the Mie-Grüneisen solid EOS in a wide range of the liquid phase diagram. This similarity is ultimately related to the condensed state of these two phases. On the other hand, the differences between the GAP equation and EOS for gases are fundamental. Finally, we identify the key gaps in the experimental data that need to be filled in to proceed further with the liquid EOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":74666,"journal":{"name":"Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generally applicable physics-based equation of state for liquids.\",\"authors\":\"J E Proctor, Kostya Trachenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6633/ad6a80\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Physics-based first-principles pressure-volume-temperature equations of state (EOS) exist for solids and gases but not for liquids due to the long-standing fundamental problems involved in liquid theory. Current EOS models that are applicable to liquids and supercritical fluids at liquid-like density under conditions relevant to planetary interiors and industrial processes are complex empirical models with many physically meaningless adjustable parameters. Here, we develop a generally applicable physics-based (GAP) EOS for liquids including supercritical fluids at liquid-like density. The GAP equation is explicit in the internal energy, and hence links the most fundamental macroscopic static property of fluids, the pressure-volume-temperature EOS, to their key microscopic property: the molecular hopping frequency or liquid relaxation time, from which the internal energy can be obtained. We test our GAP equation against available experimental data in several different ways and find good agreement. Our GAP equation, unavoidably and similarly to solid EOS, contains a semi-empirical term giving the energy of the static sample as a function of volume only (EST(V)). Our testing includes studies along isochores, in order to examine the validity of the GAP equation independently of the validity of any function we may choose to utilize forEST(V). The only other adjustable parameter in the equation is the Grüneisen parameter for the fluid. We observe that the GAP equation is similar to the Mie-Grüneisen solid EOS in a wide range of the liquid phase diagram. This similarity is ultimately related to the condensed state of these two phases. On the other hand, the differences between the GAP equation and EOS for gases are fundamental. Finally, we identify the key gaps in the experimental data that need to be filled in to proceed further with the liquid EOS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ad6a80\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ad6a80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于物理学的第一原理压力-体积-温度状态方程(EOS)适用于固体和气体,但不适用于液体,原因是液体理论中长期存在一些基本问题。目前适用于行星内部和工业过程相关条件下类似液体密度的液体和超临界流体的 EOS 模型都是复杂的经验模型,其中包含许多无物理意义的可调参数。在这里,我们为液体(包括类液态密度下的超临界流体)开发了一种基于物理学的通用(GAP)EOS。GAP 方程明确了内能,从而将流体最基本的宏观静态特性--压力-体积-温度 EOS,与其关键的微观特性--分子跳跃频率或液体弛豫时间联系起来,并从中获得内能。我们用几种不同的方法将我们的 GAP 方程与现有的实验数据进行了对比测试,结果发现两者非常吻合。与固体 EOS 相似,我们的 GAP 方程不可避免地包含了一个半经验项,它给出了静态样品的能量与体积的函数关系(EST(V))。我们的测试包括沿等距线进行的研究,以检验 GAP 方程的有效性,而不考虑我们可能选择用于 EST(V)的任何函数的有效性。方程中唯一可调整的参数是流体的格吕奈森参数。我们观察到,在液相图的很大范围内,GAP 方程与 Mie-Grüneisen 固体 EOS 相似。这种相似性归根结底与这两种物质的凝聚态有关。另一方面,GAP 方程与气体 EOS 之间的差异是根本性的。最后,我们指出了实验数据中需要填补的关键空白,以便进一步研究液态 EOS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generally applicable physics-based equation of state for liquids.

Physics-based first-principles pressure-volume-temperature equations of state (EOS) exist for solids and gases but not for liquids due to the long-standing fundamental problems involved in liquid theory. Current EOS models that are applicable to liquids and supercritical fluids at liquid-like density under conditions relevant to planetary interiors and industrial processes are complex empirical models with many physically meaningless adjustable parameters. Here, we develop a generally applicable physics-based (GAP) EOS for liquids including supercritical fluids at liquid-like density. The GAP equation is explicit in the internal energy, and hence links the most fundamental macroscopic static property of fluids, the pressure-volume-temperature EOS, to their key microscopic property: the molecular hopping frequency or liquid relaxation time, from which the internal energy can be obtained. We test our GAP equation against available experimental data in several different ways and find good agreement. Our GAP equation, unavoidably and similarly to solid EOS, contains a semi-empirical term giving the energy of the static sample as a function of volume only (EST(V)). Our testing includes studies along isochores, in order to examine the validity of the GAP equation independently of the validity of any function we may choose to utilize forEST(V). The only other adjustable parameter in the equation is the Grüneisen parameter for the fluid. We observe that the GAP equation is similar to the Mie-Grüneisen solid EOS in a wide range of the liquid phase diagram. This similarity is ultimately related to the condensed state of these two phases. On the other hand, the differences between the GAP equation and EOS for gases are fundamental. Finally, we identify the key gaps in the experimental data that need to be filled in to proceed further with the liquid EOS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interatomic Coulombic decay in lithium-doped large helium nanodroplets induced by photoelectron impact excitation. Corrigendum: A review of UTe2at high magnetic fields (2023Rep. Prog. Phys.86 114501). Transport resistance strikes back: unveiling its impact on fill factor losses in organic solar cells. Search for light long-lived particles decaying to displaced jets in proton-proton collisions ats=13.6 TeV. Resilience-runtime tradeoff relations for quantum algorithms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1