产前骨盆扩张器对初产妇阴道分娩时提肛肌撕脱的影响:随机对照试验

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Urogynecology Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1007/s00192-024-05881-6
Helai Hesham, Francisco Orejuela, Kara M. Rood, Mark Turrentine, Brian Casey, Meena Khandelwal, Rori Dajao, Sarah Azad, Todd Rosen, Matthew K. Hoffman, Eileen Y. Wang, Laura Hart, Jean-Ju Sheen, Tamara Grisales, Kelly S. Gibson, Vanessa Torbenson, Shauna F. Williams, Edward Evantash, Hans P. Dietz, Ronald J. Wapner
{"title":"产前骨盆扩张器对初产妇阴道分娩时提肛肌撕脱的影响:随机对照试验","authors":"Helai Hesham, Francisco Orejuela, Kara M. Rood, Mark Turrentine, Brian Casey, Meena Khandelwal, Rori Dajao, Sarah Azad, Todd Rosen, Matthew K. Hoffman, Eileen Y. Wang, Laura Hart, Jean-Ju Sheen, Tamara Grisales, Kelly S. Gibson, Vanessa Torbenson, Shauna F. Williams, Edward Evantash, Hans P. Dietz, Ronald J. Wapner","doi":"10.1007/s00192-024-05881-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction and Hypothesis</h3><p>The objective was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an intrapartum electromechanical pelvic floor dilator designed to reduce the risk of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion during vaginal delivery.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled nulliparous participants planning vaginal delivery. During the first stage of labor, participants were randomized to receive the intravaginal device or standard-of-care labor management. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the presence of full LAM avulsion on transperineal pelvic-floor ultrasound at 3 months. Three urogynecologists performed blinded interpretation of ultrasound images. The primary safety endpoint was adverse events (AEs) through 3 months.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 214 women were randomized to Device (<i>n</i> = 113) or Control (<i>n</i> = 101) arms. Of 113 Device assignees, 82 had a device placed, of whom 68 delivered vaginally. Of 101 Control participants, 85 delivered vaginally. At 3 months, 110 participants, 46 Device subjects who received full device treatment, and 64 Controls underwent ultrasound for the per-protocol analysis. No full LAM avulsions (0.0%) occurred in the Device group versus 7 out of 64 (10.9%) in the Control group (<i>p</i> = 0.040; two-tailed Fisher’s test). A single maternal serious AE (laceration) was device related; no neonate serious AEs were device related.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The pelvic floor dilator device significantly reduced the incidence of complete LAM avulsion in nulliparous individuals undergoing first vaginal childbirth. The dilator demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and was well received by recipients. Use of the intrapartum electromechanical pelvic floor dilator in laboring nulliparous individuals may reduce the rate of LAM avulsion, an injury associated with serious sequelae including pelvic organ prolapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of an Intrapartum Pelvic Dilator Device on Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion During Primiparous Vaginal Delivery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Helai Hesham, Francisco Orejuela, Kara M. Rood, Mark Turrentine, Brian Casey, Meena Khandelwal, Rori Dajao, Sarah Azad, Todd Rosen, Matthew K. Hoffman, Eileen Y. Wang, Laura Hart, Jean-Ju Sheen, Tamara Grisales, Kelly S. Gibson, Vanessa Torbenson, Shauna F. Williams, Edward Evantash, Hans P. Dietz, Ronald J. Wapner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-024-05881-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Introduction and Hypothesis</h3><p>The objective was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an intrapartum electromechanical pelvic floor dilator designed to reduce the risk of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion during vaginal delivery.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>A multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled nulliparous participants planning vaginal delivery. During the first stage of labor, participants were randomized to receive the intravaginal device or standard-of-care labor management. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the presence of full LAM avulsion on transperineal pelvic-floor ultrasound at 3 months. Three urogynecologists performed blinded interpretation of ultrasound images. The primary safety endpoint was adverse events (AEs) through 3 months.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>A total of 214 women were randomized to Device (<i>n</i> = 113) or Control (<i>n</i> = 101) arms. Of 113 Device assignees, 82 had a device placed, of whom 68 delivered vaginally. Of 101 Control participants, 85 delivered vaginally. At 3 months, 110 participants, 46 Device subjects who received full device treatment, and 64 Controls underwent ultrasound for the per-protocol analysis. No full LAM avulsions (0.0%) occurred in the Device group versus 7 out of 64 (10.9%) in the Control group (<i>p</i> = 0.040; two-tailed Fisher’s test). A single maternal serious AE (laceration) was device related; no neonate serious AEs were device related.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>The pelvic floor dilator device significantly reduced the incidence of complete LAM avulsion in nulliparous individuals undergoing first vaginal childbirth. The dilator demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and was well received by recipients. Use of the intrapartum electromechanical pelvic floor dilator in laboring nulliparous individuals may reduce the rate of LAM avulsion, an injury associated with serious sequelae including pelvic organ prolapse.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05881-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05881-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和假设:目的是评估一种旨在降低阴道分娩过程中提上肌(LAM)撕裂风险的产中机电盆底扩张器的安全性和有效性。方法:一项多中心随机对照试验招募了计划阴道分娩的无阴道产妇。在第一产程中,参与者被随机分配接受阴道内装置或标准护理分娩管理。主要疗效终点是3个月时经会阴盆底超声检查是否出现完全LAM撕脱。三名泌尿妇科专家对超声图像进行盲法解读。结果 共有 214 名妇女被随机分配到 "装置 "组(113 人)或对照组(101 人)。在 113 名 "装置 "受试者中,82 人植入了 "装置",其中 68 人经阴道分娩。在 101 名对照组参与者中,85 人经阴道分娩。3 个月后,110 名受试者(46 名接受完整装置治疗的装置受试者和 64 名对照组受试者)接受了超声波检查,以进行协议分析。装置组没有发生完全的 LAM 崩溃(0.0%),而对照组 64 人中有 7 人(10.9%)(P = 0.040;双尾费雪检验)。结论盆底扩张器显著降低了初次经阴道分娩的无阴道者完全撕脱 LAM 的发生率。该扩张器的安全性可接受,并且深受受术者欢迎。在无阴道分娩的产妇中使用产中机电盆底扩张器可降低LAM撕脱的发生率,这种损伤与盆腔器官脱垂等严重后遗症有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of an Intrapartum Pelvic Dilator Device on Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion During Primiparous Vaginal Delivery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction and Hypothesis

The objective was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an intrapartum electromechanical pelvic floor dilator designed to reduce the risk of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion during vaginal delivery.

Methods

A multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled nulliparous participants planning vaginal delivery. During the first stage of labor, participants were randomized to receive the intravaginal device or standard-of-care labor management. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the presence of full LAM avulsion on transperineal pelvic-floor ultrasound at 3 months. Three urogynecologists performed blinded interpretation of ultrasound images. The primary safety endpoint was adverse events (AEs) through 3 months.

Results

A total of 214 women were randomized to Device (n = 113) or Control (n = 101) arms. Of 113 Device assignees, 82 had a device placed, of whom 68 delivered vaginally. Of 101 Control participants, 85 delivered vaginally. At 3 months, 110 participants, 46 Device subjects who received full device treatment, and 64 Controls underwent ultrasound for the per-protocol analysis. No full LAM avulsions (0.0%) occurred in the Device group versus 7 out of 64 (10.9%) in the Control group (p = 0.040; two-tailed Fisher’s test). A single maternal serious AE (laceration) was device related; no neonate serious AEs were device related.

Conclusions

The pelvic floor dilator device significantly reduced the incidence of complete LAM avulsion in nulliparous individuals undergoing first vaginal childbirth. The dilator demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and was well received by recipients. Use of the intrapartum electromechanical pelvic floor dilator in laboring nulliparous individuals may reduce the rate of LAM avulsion, an injury associated with serious sequelae including pelvic organ prolapse.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes and Immunocompromised Status in Patients Undergoing Sacrocolpopexy. Silicone Irregular Hexagon Pessary Versus Polyvinyl Chloride Ring Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Randomised Controlled Trial. IUGA Scientific Meeting 2024 : 49th Annual Meeting -Singapore, June 19-22, 2024. Letter in Reply Re: Impact of Preoperative Pelvic Floor Muscle Function on the Success of Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. A Novel Sliding Knot Technique Without a Knot Pusher for Laparoscopic Pelvic Floor Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1