ChatGPT 会生成虚假结果吗?通过 ChatGPT 检索内容的挑战

IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Digital Library Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1108/dlp-01-2024-0006
Muhammad Safdar, Nadeem Siddique, Ayesha Gulzar, Haisim Yasin, Ajmal Khan
{"title":"ChatGPT 会生成虚假结果吗?通过 ChatGPT 检索内容的挑战","authors":"Muhammad Safdar, Nadeem Siddique, Ayesha Gulzar, Haisim Yasin, Ajmal Khan","doi":"10.1108/dlp-01-2024-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>ChatGPT is a new development in this technological era. This artificial intelligence-based tool responds to individuals’ queries and produces the requested content within seconds. Therefore, it is becoming popular among academics, the research community and library professionals. This study aims to test (through personal interaction with the tool) the authenticity of the ChatGPT’s produced records. Another objective of the research is to check the relevance between the individuals’ queries and the tool’s results. The research also intends to identify the challenges in retrieving information through ChatGPT.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The five researchers from different countries and organizations experienced ChatGPT by asking questions on more than 70 subjects. The responses were recorded in Notepad and converted into MS Excel and MS Access to standardize and analyze the data. The investigators consulted 11 reputed databases/sources, including Web of Science and Scopus, to assess the authenticity of the data retrieved through ChatGPT.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings confirmed that over 90% of results produced by ChatGPT were fake (the information did not exist in the literature). Similarly, the study sheds light on the discrepancies, such as irrelevant and incomplete information in the data generated by ChatGPT.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This is a unique study that shares the findings based on the different regions’ researchers’ personal experiences with ChatGPT. The researchers covered different subject areas (above 70) while asking questions to ChatGPT. The paper shares implications for researchers, students, faculty members, academic/research organizations and policymakers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":42447,"journal":{"name":"Digital Library Perspectives","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does ChatGPT generate fake results? Challenges in retrieving content through ChatGPT\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Safdar, Nadeem Siddique, Ayesha Gulzar, Haisim Yasin, Ajmal Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dlp-01-2024-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>ChatGPT is a new development in this technological era. This artificial intelligence-based tool responds to individuals’ queries and produces the requested content within seconds. Therefore, it is becoming popular among academics, the research community and library professionals. This study aims to test (through personal interaction with the tool) the authenticity of the ChatGPT’s produced records. Another objective of the research is to check the relevance between the individuals’ queries and the tool’s results. The research also intends to identify the challenges in retrieving information through ChatGPT.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The five researchers from different countries and organizations experienced ChatGPT by asking questions on more than 70 subjects. The responses were recorded in Notepad and converted into MS Excel and MS Access to standardize and analyze the data. The investigators consulted 11 reputed databases/sources, including Web of Science and Scopus, to assess the authenticity of the data retrieved through ChatGPT.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The findings confirmed that over 90% of results produced by ChatGPT were fake (the information did not exist in the literature). Similarly, the study sheds light on the discrepancies, such as irrelevant and incomplete information in the data generated by ChatGPT.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This is a unique study that shares the findings based on the different regions’ researchers’ personal experiences with ChatGPT. The researchers covered different subject areas (above 70) while asking questions to ChatGPT. The paper shares implications for researchers, students, faculty members, academic/research organizations and policymakers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":42447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Library Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Library Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-01-2024-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Library Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-01-2024-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

PurposeChatGPT 是当今技术时代的一项新发展。这种基于人工智能的工具可在数秒内响应个人的查询并生成所需的内容。因此,它正受到学术界、研究界和图书馆专业人员的欢迎。本研究旨在(通过与该工具的个人互动)测试 ChatGPT 生成的记录的真实性。研究的另一个目的是检查个人查询与工具结果之间的相关性。来自不同国家和组织的五位研究人员体验了 ChatGPT,就 70 多个主题提出了问题。这些回答被记录在记事本中,并转换成 MS Excel 和 MS Access,以便对数据进行标准化和分析。研究人员查阅了 11 个著名的数据库/资料来源,包括 Web of Science 和 Scopus,以评估通过 ChatGPT 所获取数据的真实性。同样,本研究还揭示了 ChatGPT 生成的数据中存在的差异,如不相关和不完整的信息。原创性/价值这是一项独特的研究,根据不同地区研究人员使用 ChatGPT 的个人经验分享了研究结果。研究人员在向 ChatGPT 提问时涵盖了不同的学科领域(超过 70 个)。本文分享了对研究人员、学生、教师、学术/研究组织和政策制定者的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does ChatGPT generate fake results? Challenges in retrieving content through ChatGPT

Purpose

ChatGPT is a new development in this technological era. This artificial intelligence-based tool responds to individuals’ queries and produces the requested content within seconds. Therefore, it is becoming popular among academics, the research community and library professionals. This study aims to test (through personal interaction with the tool) the authenticity of the ChatGPT’s produced records. Another objective of the research is to check the relevance between the individuals’ queries and the tool’s results. The research also intends to identify the challenges in retrieving information through ChatGPT.

Design/methodology/approach

The five researchers from different countries and organizations experienced ChatGPT by asking questions on more than 70 subjects. The responses were recorded in Notepad and converted into MS Excel and MS Access to standardize and analyze the data. The investigators consulted 11 reputed databases/sources, including Web of Science and Scopus, to assess the authenticity of the data retrieved through ChatGPT.

Findings

The findings confirmed that over 90% of results produced by ChatGPT were fake (the information did not exist in the literature). Similarly, the study sheds light on the discrepancies, such as irrelevant and incomplete information in the data generated by ChatGPT.

Originality/value

This is a unique study that shares the findings based on the different regions’ researchers’ personal experiences with ChatGPT. The researchers covered different subject areas (above 70) while asking questions to ChatGPT. The paper shares implications for researchers, students, faculty members, academic/research organizations and policymakers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Library Perspectives
Digital Library Perspectives INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Digital Library Perspectives (DLP) is a peer-reviewed journal concerned with digital content collections. It publishes research related to the curation and web-based delivery of digital objects collected for the advancement of scholarship, teaching and learning. And which advance the digital information environment as it relates to global knowledge, communication and world memory. The journal aims to keep readers informed about current trends, initiatives, and developments. Including those in digital libraries and digital repositories, along with their standards and technologies. The editor invites contributions on the following, as well as other related topics: Digitization, Data as information, Archives and manuscripts, Digital preservation and digital archiving, Digital cultural memory initiatives, Usability studies, K-12 and higher education uses of digital collections.
期刊最新文献
Multimethod digitalisation of a large-format school map from the first half of the 20th century Preservation of theses and dissertations in the era of digitization: a case study of selected universities in Oyo state, Nigeria Dynamics of plagiarism among the social sciences students at Kuwait University Undergraduates’ experiences with library portal services: perceptions of usefulness and satisfaction Digital information needs and information-seeking behaviour among legal practitioners at the Lahore High Court, Punjab, Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1