沥青混凝土厚提升摊铺评估

Bryan Wilson, Moises Saca, Darlene Goehl
{"title":"沥青混凝土厚提升摊铺评估","authors":"Bryan Wilson, Moises Saca, Darlene Goehl","doi":"10.1177/03611981241255371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research paper focuses on the feasibility of thick-lift paving with asphalt concrete. Thick-lift paving is the placement of asphalt concrete in a lift greater than the allowable maximum by an agency, often four to five times the nominal maximum aggregate size. Thick-lift paving offers potential benefits including streamlining operations and eliminating the bond interface in multi-lift layers. However, it also presents challenges such as potential for inadequate compaction and lower ride quality. Asphalt concrete design and construction specifications from 19 state Departments of Transportation were reviewed. In the field, 28 thick-paving test sections were constructed with different lift thicknesses (3 to 10 in.), two mix designs, different paving screed settings, and different rolling patterns. All pavers were equipped with tamper bar screeds. During construction, the researchers monitored asphalt cooldown time and mat density. After construction, the ride quality of each section was measured, and cores were tested for air voids content. Acceptable mat compaction was achieved in all test sections, with additional roller passes having the most significant effect on compaction. The study also found that thick one-lift layers yielded better and more uniform compaction than two-lift layers. Thicker lifts had significantly longer cool down times and potentially increased roughness. Recommendations included the possible use of tamper bar screeds and additional roller passes to improve compaction. Scenarios that are suitable for thick-lift paving were identified.","PeriodicalId":517391,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","volume":"364 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Thick-Lift Paving of Asphalt Concrete\",\"authors\":\"Bryan Wilson, Moises Saca, Darlene Goehl\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03611981241255371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research paper focuses on the feasibility of thick-lift paving with asphalt concrete. Thick-lift paving is the placement of asphalt concrete in a lift greater than the allowable maximum by an agency, often four to five times the nominal maximum aggregate size. Thick-lift paving offers potential benefits including streamlining operations and eliminating the bond interface in multi-lift layers. However, it also presents challenges such as potential for inadequate compaction and lower ride quality. Asphalt concrete design and construction specifications from 19 state Departments of Transportation were reviewed. In the field, 28 thick-paving test sections were constructed with different lift thicknesses (3 to 10 in.), two mix designs, different paving screed settings, and different rolling patterns. All pavers were equipped with tamper bar screeds. During construction, the researchers monitored asphalt cooldown time and mat density. After construction, the ride quality of each section was measured, and cores were tested for air voids content. Acceptable mat compaction was achieved in all test sections, with additional roller passes having the most significant effect on compaction. The study also found that thick one-lift layers yielded better and more uniform compaction than two-lift layers. Thicker lifts had significantly longer cool down times and potentially increased roughness. Recommendations included the possible use of tamper bar screeds and additional roller passes to improve compaction. Scenarios that are suitable for thick-lift paving were identified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board\",\"volume\":\"364 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241255371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241255371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究论文的重点是沥青混凝土厚层摊铺的可行性。厚层沥青混凝土摊铺是指沥青混凝土的摊铺厚度大于机构允许的最大值,通常是标称最大集料尺寸的四到五倍。厚层摊铺具有潜在的优势,包括简化操作和消除多层摊铺中的粘结界面。然而,它也带来了一些挑战,如可能出现压实不足和行驶质量下降等问题。对 19 个州交通部的沥青混凝土设计和施工规范进行了审查。在现场,采用不同的提升厚度(3 到 10 英寸)、两种混合料设计、不同的摊铺熨平板设置和不同的碾压模式,建造了 28 个厚摊铺试验段。所有摊铺机都配备了夯杆熨平板。在施工过程中,研究人员对沥青冷却时间和垫层密度进行了监测。施工结束后,对每段路面的行驶质量进行了测量,并对路芯的空隙含量进行了检测。所有试验路段都达到了可接受的垫层压实度,增加压路机碾压次数对压实度的影响最大。研究还发现,厚的一碾压层比两碾压层的压实效果更好、更均匀。较厚的碾压层冷却时间明显较长,可能会增加粗糙度。建议包括可能使用夯杆熨平板和额外的压路机碾压,以改善压实效果。确定了适合厚层摊铺的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Thick-Lift Paving of Asphalt Concrete
This research paper focuses on the feasibility of thick-lift paving with asphalt concrete. Thick-lift paving is the placement of asphalt concrete in a lift greater than the allowable maximum by an agency, often four to five times the nominal maximum aggregate size. Thick-lift paving offers potential benefits including streamlining operations and eliminating the bond interface in multi-lift layers. However, it also presents challenges such as potential for inadequate compaction and lower ride quality. Asphalt concrete design and construction specifications from 19 state Departments of Transportation were reviewed. In the field, 28 thick-paving test sections were constructed with different lift thicknesses (3 to 10 in.), two mix designs, different paving screed settings, and different rolling patterns. All pavers were equipped with tamper bar screeds. During construction, the researchers monitored asphalt cooldown time and mat density. After construction, the ride quality of each section was measured, and cores were tested for air voids content. Acceptable mat compaction was achieved in all test sections, with additional roller passes having the most significant effect on compaction. The study also found that thick one-lift layers yielded better and more uniform compaction than two-lift layers. Thicker lifts had significantly longer cool down times and potentially increased roughness. Recommendations included the possible use of tamper bar screeds and additional roller passes to improve compaction. Scenarios that are suitable for thick-lift paving were identified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ordinal Clustering Based Homogeneous Road Segments in Asphalt Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Optimized Decision-Making Exploring the Relationship Between COVID-19 Transmission and Population Mobility over Time CTAFFNet: CNN–Transformer Adaptive Feature Fusion Object Detection Algorithm for Complex Traffic Scenarios Eye Movement Evaluation of Pedestrians' Mobile Phone Usage at Street Crossings Impact of Texting-Induced Distraction on Driving Behavior Based on Field Operation Tests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1