{"title":"在农林业和种植园环境中种植的两种龙柏克隆的生长情况:九年结果","authors":"Kozma Naka, Shaik Hossain, Luben D. Dimov","doi":"10.1007/s10457-024-01040-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Selecting suitable tree species, cultivars or clones in agroforestry is essential for maximizing volume growth and reducing mortality. While most studies have investigated the performance of understory crops, more information is needed about the performance of trees in agroforestry systems. In the last decades, the forest industry in the Southeast has produced high-yielding loblolly pine varieties that can be propagated by cloning. We evaluated the performance of two forest industry-rated loblolly pine clones (<i>Pinus taeda</i> L.) that we planted in an agroforestry and a plantation setting at a northern Alabama site. Specifically, we assessed and compared the survival and growth of two genetically improved pine clones: clone 1 (CF Q3802-43) and clone 2 (CF L3519-41). Clone 1 had a significantly higher overall survival rate than clone 2 (86% vs. 83%). However, clone 2 demonstrated a superior performance growth compared to clone 1. Tree basal area, live crown ratio, height and total tree volume inside-bark of clone 2 averaged 0.027 m<sup>2</sup>, 70%, 10.7 m and 0.11 m<sup>3</sup>, respectively, and all were significantly higher than those of clone 1 (0.024 m<sup>2</sup>, 63%, 9.8 m, and 0.09 m<sup>3</sup>). Therefore, clone 1 is preferred over clone 2 for our region and in similar site conditions if survival is considered a selection criterion and clone 2 is preferred from the wood production viewpoint. However, it will be more advantageous to use clone 2 overall since its higher average tree volume (0.11 m<sup>3</sup> vs. 0.09 m<sup>3</sup> of clone 1) can easily offset the lower survival rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"98 7","pages":"2449 - 2461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth of two loblolly pine clones planted in agroforestry and plantation settings: nine-year results\",\"authors\":\"Kozma Naka, Shaik Hossain, Luben D. Dimov\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10457-024-01040-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Selecting suitable tree species, cultivars or clones in agroforestry is essential for maximizing volume growth and reducing mortality. While most studies have investigated the performance of understory crops, more information is needed about the performance of trees in agroforestry systems. In the last decades, the forest industry in the Southeast has produced high-yielding loblolly pine varieties that can be propagated by cloning. We evaluated the performance of two forest industry-rated loblolly pine clones (<i>Pinus taeda</i> L.) that we planted in an agroforestry and a plantation setting at a northern Alabama site. Specifically, we assessed and compared the survival and growth of two genetically improved pine clones: clone 1 (CF Q3802-43) and clone 2 (CF L3519-41). Clone 1 had a significantly higher overall survival rate than clone 2 (86% vs. 83%). However, clone 2 demonstrated a superior performance growth compared to clone 1. Tree basal area, live crown ratio, height and total tree volume inside-bark of clone 2 averaged 0.027 m<sup>2</sup>, 70%, 10.7 m and 0.11 m<sup>3</sup>, respectively, and all were significantly higher than those of clone 1 (0.024 m<sup>2</sup>, 63%, 9.8 m, and 0.09 m<sup>3</sup>). Therefore, clone 1 is preferred over clone 2 for our region and in similar site conditions if survival is considered a selection criterion and clone 2 is preferred from the wood production viewpoint. However, it will be more advantageous to use clone 2 overall since its higher average tree volume (0.11 m<sup>3</sup> vs. 0.09 m<sup>3</sup> of clone 1) can easily offset the lower survival rate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"volume\":\"98 7\",\"pages\":\"2449 - 2461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-024-01040-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-024-01040-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Growth of two loblolly pine clones planted in agroforestry and plantation settings: nine-year results
Selecting suitable tree species, cultivars or clones in agroforestry is essential for maximizing volume growth and reducing mortality. While most studies have investigated the performance of understory crops, more information is needed about the performance of trees in agroforestry systems. In the last decades, the forest industry in the Southeast has produced high-yielding loblolly pine varieties that can be propagated by cloning. We evaluated the performance of two forest industry-rated loblolly pine clones (Pinus taeda L.) that we planted in an agroforestry and a plantation setting at a northern Alabama site. Specifically, we assessed and compared the survival and growth of two genetically improved pine clones: clone 1 (CF Q3802-43) and clone 2 (CF L3519-41). Clone 1 had a significantly higher overall survival rate than clone 2 (86% vs. 83%). However, clone 2 demonstrated a superior performance growth compared to clone 1. Tree basal area, live crown ratio, height and total tree volume inside-bark of clone 2 averaged 0.027 m2, 70%, 10.7 m and 0.11 m3, respectively, and all were significantly higher than those of clone 1 (0.024 m2, 63%, 9.8 m, and 0.09 m3). Therefore, clone 1 is preferred over clone 2 for our region and in similar site conditions if survival is considered a selection criterion and clone 2 is preferred from the wood production viewpoint. However, it will be more advantageous to use clone 2 overall since its higher average tree volume (0.11 m3 vs. 0.09 m3 of clone 1) can easily offset the lower survival rate.
期刊介绍:
Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base