在农林业和种植园环境中种植的两种龙柏克隆的生长情况:九年结果

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Agroforestry Systems Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1007/s10457-024-01040-4
Kozma Naka, Shaik Hossain, Luben D. Dimov
{"title":"在农林业和种植园环境中种植的两种龙柏克隆的生长情况:九年结果","authors":"Kozma Naka,&nbsp;Shaik Hossain,&nbsp;Luben D. Dimov","doi":"10.1007/s10457-024-01040-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Selecting suitable tree species, cultivars or clones in agroforestry is essential for maximizing volume growth and reducing mortality. While most studies have investigated the performance of understory crops, more information is needed about the performance of trees in agroforestry systems. In the last decades, the forest industry in the Southeast has produced high-yielding loblolly pine varieties that can be propagated by cloning. We evaluated the performance of two forest industry-rated loblolly pine clones (<i>Pinus taeda</i> L.) that we planted in an agroforestry and a plantation setting at a northern Alabama site. Specifically, we assessed and compared the survival and growth of two genetically improved pine clones: clone 1 (CF Q3802-43) and clone 2 (CF L3519-41). Clone 1 had a significantly higher overall survival rate than clone 2 (86% vs. 83%). However, clone 2 demonstrated a superior performance growth compared to clone 1. Tree basal area, live crown ratio, height and total tree volume inside-bark of clone 2 averaged 0.027 m<sup>2</sup>, 70%, 10.7 m and 0.11 m<sup>3</sup>, respectively, and all were significantly higher than those of clone 1 (0.024 m<sup>2</sup>, 63%, 9.8 m, and 0.09 m<sup>3</sup>). Therefore, clone 1 is preferred over clone 2 for our region and in similar site conditions if survival is considered a selection criterion and clone 2 is preferred from the wood production viewpoint. However, it will be more advantageous to use clone 2 overall since its higher average tree volume (0.11 m<sup>3</sup> vs. 0.09 m<sup>3</sup> of clone 1) can easily offset the lower survival rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"98 7","pages":"2449 - 2461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth of two loblolly pine clones planted in agroforestry and plantation settings: nine-year results\",\"authors\":\"Kozma Naka,&nbsp;Shaik Hossain,&nbsp;Luben D. Dimov\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10457-024-01040-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Selecting suitable tree species, cultivars or clones in agroforestry is essential for maximizing volume growth and reducing mortality. While most studies have investigated the performance of understory crops, more information is needed about the performance of trees in agroforestry systems. In the last decades, the forest industry in the Southeast has produced high-yielding loblolly pine varieties that can be propagated by cloning. We evaluated the performance of two forest industry-rated loblolly pine clones (<i>Pinus taeda</i> L.) that we planted in an agroforestry and a plantation setting at a northern Alabama site. Specifically, we assessed and compared the survival and growth of two genetically improved pine clones: clone 1 (CF Q3802-43) and clone 2 (CF L3519-41). Clone 1 had a significantly higher overall survival rate than clone 2 (86% vs. 83%). However, clone 2 demonstrated a superior performance growth compared to clone 1. Tree basal area, live crown ratio, height and total tree volume inside-bark of clone 2 averaged 0.027 m<sup>2</sup>, 70%, 10.7 m and 0.11 m<sup>3</sup>, respectively, and all were significantly higher than those of clone 1 (0.024 m<sup>2</sup>, 63%, 9.8 m, and 0.09 m<sup>3</sup>). Therefore, clone 1 is preferred over clone 2 for our region and in similar site conditions if survival is considered a selection criterion and clone 2 is preferred from the wood production viewpoint. However, it will be more advantageous to use clone 2 overall since its higher average tree volume (0.11 m<sup>3</sup> vs. 0.09 m<sup>3</sup> of clone 1) can easily offset the lower survival rate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"volume\":\"98 7\",\"pages\":\"2449 - 2461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-024-01040-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-024-01040-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在农林业中选择合适的树种、栽培品种或克隆对于最大限度地提高生长量和降低死亡率至关重要。虽然大多数研究都对林下作物的表现进行了调查,但还需要更多有关农林系统中树木表现的信息。在过去的几十年里,东南部的林业生产出了可以通过克隆技术繁殖的高产龙柏品种。我们评估了在阿拉巴马州北部的农林业和人工林环境中种植的两种森林工业等级的龙柏克隆品种(Pinus taeda L.)的表现。具体来说,我们评估并比较了两种基因改良的松树克隆:克隆 1(CF Q3802-43)和克隆 2(CF L3519-41)的存活率和生长情况。克隆 1 的总体存活率明显高于克隆 2(86% 对 83%)。不过,克隆 2 的生长表现优于克隆 1。克隆 2 的树木基部面积、活冠比、树高和树皮内总体积平均分别为 0.027 平方米、70%、10.7 米和 0.11 立方米,均明显高于克隆 1(0.024 平方米、63%、9.8 米和 0.09 立方米)。因此,在本地区和类似的地点条件下,如果以成活率为选择标准,克隆 1 比克隆 2 更受青睐,而从木材产量的角度来看,克隆 2 更受青睐。不过,总体而言,使用克隆 2 更为有利,因为其较高的平均树木体积(0.11 立方米对克隆 1 的 0.09 立方米)可以轻松抵消较低的成活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Growth of two loblolly pine clones planted in agroforestry and plantation settings: nine-year results

Selecting suitable tree species, cultivars or clones in agroforestry is essential for maximizing volume growth and reducing mortality. While most studies have investigated the performance of understory crops, more information is needed about the performance of trees in agroforestry systems. In the last decades, the forest industry in the Southeast has produced high-yielding loblolly pine varieties that can be propagated by cloning. We evaluated the performance of two forest industry-rated loblolly pine clones (Pinus taeda L.) that we planted in an agroforestry and a plantation setting at a northern Alabama site. Specifically, we assessed and compared the survival and growth of two genetically improved pine clones: clone 1 (CF Q3802-43) and clone 2 (CF L3519-41). Clone 1 had a significantly higher overall survival rate than clone 2 (86% vs. 83%). However, clone 2 demonstrated a superior performance growth compared to clone 1. Tree basal area, live crown ratio, height and total tree volume inside-bark of clone 2 averaged 0.027 m2, 70%, 10.7 m and 0.11 m3, respectively, and all were significantly higher than those of clone 1 (0.024 m2, 63%, 9.8 m, and 0.09 m3). Therefore, clone 1 is preferred over clone 2 for our region and in similar site conditions if survival is considered a selection criterion and clone 2 is preferred from the wood production viewpoint. However, it will be more advantageous to use clone 2 overall since its higher average tree volume (0.11 m3 vs. 0.09 m3 of clone 1) can easily offset the lower survival rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
期刊最新文献
Current trends in silvopastoral systems Correction: Botanical composition gradients in silvopastoral systems on temperate native grasslands of Uruguay Correction: Silvopastoral transitions in Latin America: toward diverse perennial systems Designing silvopastoral systems: a simulation model approach Silvopastoral systems as a strategy to attenuate the negative effects of heat stress on productivity of beef cows grazing natural grassland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1