Yosuke Yamada, Stefan Küffer, Christian Sauer, Masahito Hoki, Shinsuke Shibuya, Hideaki Tsujii, Kazuo Ono, Koki Moriyoshi, Hiroshi Date, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Malgorzata Szolkowska, Hironori Haga, Phillip Ströbel, Alexander Marx
{"title":"免疫组织化学检测 YAP1 N 端和 C 端可通过不同的染色模式突出显示变性胸腺瘤和高级别胸腺上皮肿瘤","authors":"Yosuke Yamada, Stefan Küffer, Christian Sauer, Masahito Hoki, Shinsuke Shibuya, Hideaki Tsujii, Kazuo Ono, Koki Moriyoshi, Hiroshi Date, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Malgorzata Szolkowska, Hironori Haga, Phillip Ströbel, Alexander Marx","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03888-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Metaplastic thymoma (MT), a rare subtype of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), harbors <i>YAP1::MAML2</i> fusions. Poroma, a skin tumor, also carries these fusions and exhibits a unique staining pattern for YAP1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), namely, a YAP1 N-terminus (YAP1[N])-positive but YAP1 C-terminus (YAP1[C])-negative pattern. In this context, MT was recently reported to lack YAP1(C) expression exclusively among TET subtypes. However, a lack of information about YAP1(N) expression in that study and another report that wild-type YAP1 expression was diminished in type B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma warrants further studies for YAP1 expression in TETs. Thus, we immunohistochemically examined YAP1(N) and YAP1(C) staining patterns in our TET samples, including 14 cases of MT. In addition, 11 of the 14 MT cases were genetically analyzed with the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues if they harbored <i>YAP1::MAML2</i> fusions. MT consistently exhibited YAP1(N)-positive and YAP(C)-negative staining, whereas type B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma showed relatively heterogeneous staining patterns for YAP1(N) and YAP1(C) and were sometimes negative for both antibodies. Furthermore, a lower expression of YAP1 was found in type B3 compared to B2 thymomas. Among genetically analyzed 11 MT cases, 6 cases showed <i>YAP1::MAML2</i> fusions, whereas the analysis failed in 5 very old cases due to poor RNA quality. These results indicate that IHC of both YAP1(N) and YAP1(C) is recommended to obtain staining patterns almost unique to MT. The biological significance of YAP1 in high-grade TETs warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunohistochemistry for YAP1 N-terminus and C-terminus highlights metaplastic thymoma and high-grade thymic epithelial tumors by different staining patterns\",\"authors\":\"Yosuke Yamada, Stefan Küffer, Christian Sauer, Masahito Hoki, Shinsuke Shibuya, Hideaki Tsujii, Kazuo Ono, Koki Moriyoshi, Hiroshi Date, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Malgorzata Szolkowska, Hironori Haga, Phillip Ströbel, Alexander Marx\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-024-03888-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Metaplastic thymoma (MT), a rare subtype of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), harbors <i>YAP1::MAML2</i> fusions. Poroma, a skin tumor, also carries these fusions and exhibits a unique staining pattern for YAP1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), namely, a YAP1 N-terminus (YAP1[N])-positive but YAP1 C-terminus (YAP1[C])-negative pattern. In this context, MT was recently reported to lack YAP1(C) expression exclusively among TET subtypes. However, a lack of information about YAP1(N) expression in that study and another report that wild-type YAP1 expression was diminished in type B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma warrants further studies for YAP1 expression in TETs. Thus, we immunohistochemically examined YAP1(N) and YAP1(C) staining patterns in our TET samples, including 14 cases of MT. In addition, 11 of the 14 MT cases were genetically analyzed with the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues if they harbored <i>YAP1::MAML2</i> fusions. MT consistently exhibited YAP1(N)-positive and YAP(C)-negative staining, whereas type B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma showed relatively heterogeneous staining patterns for YAP1(N) and YAP1(C) and were sometimes negative for both antibodies. Furthermore, a lower expression of YAP1 was found in type B3 compared to B2 thymomas. Among genetically analyzed 11 MT cases, 6 cases showed <i>YAP1::MAML2</i> fusions, whereas the analysis failed in 5 very old cases due to poor RNA quality. These results indicate that IHC of both YAP1(N) and YAP1(C) is recommended to obtain staining patterns almost unique to MT. The biological significance of YAP1 in high-grade TETs warrants further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03888-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03888-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Immunohistochemistry for YAP1 N-terminus and C-terminus highlights metaplastic thymoma and high-grade thymic epithelial tumors by different staining patterns
Metaplastic thymoma (MT), a rare subtype of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), harbors YAP1::MAML2 fusions. Poroma, a skin tumor, also carries these fusions and exhibits a unique staining pattern for YAP1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), namely, a YAP1 N-terminus (YAP1[N])-positive but YAP1 C-terminus (YAP1[C])-negative pattern. In this context, MT was recently reported to lack YAP1(C) expression exclusively among TET subtypes. However, a lack of information about YAP1(N) expression in that study and another report that wild-type YAP1 expression was diminished in type B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma warrants further studies for YAP1 expression in TETs. Thus, we immunohistochemically examined YAP1(N) and YAP1(C) staining patterns in our TET samples, including 14 cases of MT. In addition, 11 of the 14 MT cases were genetically analyzed with the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues if they harbored YAP1::MAML2 fusions. MT consistently exhibited YAP1(N)-positive and YAP(C)-negative staining, whereas type B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma showed relatively heterogeneous staining patterns for YAP1(N) and YAP1(C) and were sometimes negative for both antibodies. Furthermore, a lower expression of YAP1 was found in type B3 compared to B2 thymomas. Among genetically analyzed 11 MT cases, 6 cases showed YAP1::MAML2 fusions, whereas the analysis failed in 5 very old cases due to poor RNA quality. These results indicate that IHC of both YAP1(N) and YAP1(C) is recommended to obtain staining patterns almost unique to MT. The biological significance of YAP1 in high-grade TETs warrants further investigation.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.