头胎产妇在宫口完全扩张时进行剖宫产与后续流产风险增加无关:一项历史队列研究。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-08-04 DOI:10.1111/aogs.14936
Andrea Woolner, Edwin Amalraj Raja, Mairead Black
{"title":"头胎产妇在宫口完全扩张时进行剖宫产与后续流产风险增加无关:一项历史队列研究。","authors":"Andrea Woolner,&nbsp;Edwin Amalraj Raja,&nbsp;Mairead Black","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Cesarean section at full dilatation has been associated with an increased risk of subsequent preterm birth. We hypothesized that there may be an increased risk of miscarriage in pregnancies that follow cesarean section at full dilatation. This study aimed to determine if a first-term (≥37 weeks) cesarean section at full dilatation is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage in the next pregnancy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A historical cohort study was conducted using routinely collected hospital data within the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank (AMND). The population included were women who had a first-term birth and who had a second birth recorded within the AMND. Logistic and multinomial regression was used to determine any association with miscarriage at any gestation and for early (&lt;13 weeks gestation) and late (13–23 + 6 weeks gestation) miscarriage, with cesarean section at full dilatation defined as the exposure. Miscarriage in the second pregnancy (spontaneous loss of intrauterine pregnancy prior to 24 weeks gestation) was the primary outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 33 452 women were included. Women who had a first cesarean section at full dilatation were no more likely to have a miscarriage at any gestation than women with all other modes of first birth (including all vaginal births, planned CS, and the first stage of labor (&lt;10 cm dilated CS)) [adjusted OR 0.84 (0.66–1.08); <i>p</i> = 0.18]. There was no association with early or late miscarriage after a CSfd, though the sample size for late miscarriage was small.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This is the first observational study to investigate the risk of miscarriage following first-term CSfd. We found no association between miscarriage at any gestation following a first-term CSfd compared to all other modes of first birth.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"103 10","pages":"2092-2100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aogs.14936","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cesarean section at full dilatation in the first birth is not associated with an increased risk of subsequent miscarriage: A historical cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Woolner,&nbsp;Edwin Amalraj Raja,&nbsp;Mairead Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aogs.14936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cesarean section at full dilatation has been associated with an increased risk of subsequent preterm birth. We hypothesized that there may be an increased risk of miscarriage in pregnancies that follow cesarean section at full dilatation. This study aimed to determine if a first-term (≥37 weeks) cesarean section at full dilatation is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage in the next pregnancy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A historical cohort study was conducted using routinely collected hospital data within the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank (AMND). The population included were women who had a first-term birth and who had a second birth recorded within the AMND. Logistic and multinomial regression was used to determine any association with miscarriage at any gestation and for early (&lt;13 weeks gestation) and late (13–23 + 6 weeks gestation) miscarriage, with cesarean section at full dilatation defined as the exposure. Miscarriage in the second pregnancy (spontaneous loss of intrauterine pregnancy prior to 24 weeks gestation) was the primary outcome.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 33 452 women were included. Women who had a first cesarean section at full dilatation were no more likely to have a miscarriage at any gestation than women with all other modes of first birth (including all vaginal births, planned CS, and the first stage of labor (&lt;10 cm dilated CS)) [adjusted OR 0.84 (0.66–1.08); <i>p</i> = 0.18]. There was no association with early or late miscarriage after a CSfd, though the sample size for late miscarriage was small.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is the first observational study to investigate the risk of miscarriage following first-term CSfd. We found no association between miscarriage at any gestation following a first-term CSfd compared to all other modes of first birth.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"103 10\",\"pages\":\"2092-2100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aogs.14936\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.14936\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.14936","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言宫口完全扩张时进行剖宫产与随后发生早产的风险增加有关。我们假设,在完全扩张时进行剖宫产的孕妇流产的风险可能会增加。本研究旨在确定足月剖宫产(≥37周)是否与下一次妊娠流产风险增加有关:利用阿伯丁孕产妇和新生儿数据库(AMND)中例行收集的医院数据,进行了一项历史性队列研究。研究对象为在阿伯丁产妇和新生儿数据库(AMND)中有记录的头胎产妇和二胎产妇。采用逻辑回归和多项式回归来确定流产与任何妊娠期和早期流产的关系:共纳入 33 452 名妇女。与所有其他初次分娩方式(包括所有阴道分娩、计划 CS 和第一产程)的妇女相比,首次剖宫产后宫口全开的妇女在任何妊娠期流产的可能性都不高:这是第一项研究头胎剖宫产后流产风险的观察性研究。我们发现,与所有其他头胎分娩方式相比,头胎剖宫产后任何妊娠期的流产都没有关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cesarean section at full dilatation in the first birth is not associated with an increased risk of subsequent miscarriage: A historical cohort study

Introduction

Cesarean section at full dilatation has been associated with an increased risk of subsequent preterm birth. We hypothesized that there may be an increased risk of miscarriage in pregnancies that follow cesarean section at full dilatation. This study aimed to determine if a first-term (≥37 weeks) cesarean section at full dilatation is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage in the next pregnancy.

Material and Methods

A historical cohort study was conducted using routinely collected hospital data within the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank (AMND). The population included were women who had a first-term birth and who had a second birth recorded within the AMND. Logistic and multinomial regression was used to determine any association with miscarriage at any gestation and for early (<13 weeks gestation) and late (13–23 + 6 weeks gestation) miscarriage, with cesarean section at full dilatation defined as the exposure. Miscarriage in the second pregnancy (spontaneous loss of intrauterine pregnancy prior to 24 weeks gestation) was the primary outcome.

Results

In total, 33 452 women were included. Women who had a first cesarean section at full dilatation were no more likely to have a miscarriage at any gestation than women with all other modes of first birth (including all vaginal births, planned CS, and the first stage of labor (<10 cm dilated CS)) [adjusted OR 0.84 (0.66–1.08); p = 0.18]. There was no association with early or late miscarriage after a CSfd, though the sample size for late miscarriage was small.

Conclusions

This is the first observational study to investigate the risk of miscarriage following first-term CSfd. We found no association between miscarriage at any gestation following a first-term CSfd compared to all other modes of first birth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Decreased expression of Syndecan- 1 (CD138) in the endometrium of adenomyosis patients suggests a potential pathogenetic role. Fetal rotation examined with ultrasound in a sub-Saharan population: A longitudinal cohort study. The complexity and challenges of fertility preservation in women with cervix cancer-A prospective cohort study reporting on reproductive outcome and overall survival. Hospital obstetric volume and maternal outcomes: Does hospital size matter? Prediction of uterine rupture in singleton pregnancies with one prior cesarean birth undergoing TOLAC: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1