Amanda G Smith, Antony P McNamee, Chris H H Chan, John Headrick, Michael J Simmonds
{"title":"用于机械循环装置测试的冯-威廉因子多聚体分析的增强型快速方法。","authors":"Amanda G Smith, Antony P McNamee, Chris H H Chan, John Headrick, Michael J Simmonds","doi":"10.1111/aor.14838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a critical glycoprotein in hemostasis and is an important factor in diagnosing bleeding disorders. Albeit the analysis of VWF is often compromised by inconsistent methodologies and challenges quantifying multimeric size. Current VWF multimer analysis methods are costly, time-consuming, and often inconsistent; thus, demanding skilled professionals. This study aimed to streamline and optimize the VWF multimer analysis technique, making it more efficient and reproducible, particularly for identifying or predicting mechanical circulatory support (MCS) induced bleeding disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples from healthy volunteers were exposed to high shear forces via a Medtronic HeartWare ventricular assist device. VWF multimers were analyzed using vertical-gel agarose electrophoresis and Western blotting. Differences in VWF distribution were determined using densitometry, and two methods of densitometric analysis were compared: proprietary software against open-source software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the developed method: (i) protocol duration was accelerated from three days (in classical methods) to ~ eight hours; (ii) the resolution of the high molecular weight (HMW) VWF multimers were substantially improved; and (iii) densitometric analysis tools were validated. Additionally, the densitometry analysis using two software types showed a strong correlation between results, with the proprietary software reporting slightly higher HMW VWF percentages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This methodology is recommended for affordable, accurate, and reproducible VWF multimer evaluations during MCS use and testing. Further research comparing this method with semi-automated methods would provide additional insight and improve inter-laboratory comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An enhanced and rapid method for von Willebrand factor multimer analysis for mechanical circulatory device testing.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda G Smith, Antony P McNamee, Chris H H Chan, John Headrick, Michael J Simmonds\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aor.14838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a critical glycoprotein in hemostasis and is an important factor in diagnosing bleeding disorders. Albeit the analysis of VWF is often compromised by inconsistent methodologies and challenges quantifying multimeric size. Current VWF multimer analysis methods are costly, time-consuming, and often inconsistent; thus, demanding skilled professionals. This study aimed to streamline and optimize the VWF multimer analysis technique, making it more efficient and reproducible, particularly for identifying or predicting mechanical circulatory support (MCS) induced bleeding disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples from healthy volunteers were exposed to high shear forces via a Medtronic HeartWare ventricular assist device. VWF multimers were analyzed using vertical-gel agarose electrophoresis and Western blotting. Differences in VWF distribution were determined using densitometry, and two methods of densitometric analysis were compared: proprietary software against open-source software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the developed method: (i) protocol duration was accelerated from three days (in classical methods) to ~ eight hours; (ii) the resolution of the high molecular weight (HMW) VWF multimers were substantially improved; and (iii) densitometric analysis tools were validated. Additionally, the densitometry analysis using two software types showed a strong correlation between results, with the proprietary software reporting slightly higher HMW VWF percentages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This methodology is recommended for affordable, accurate, and reproducible VWF multimer evaluations during MCS use and testing. Further research comparing this method with semi-automated methods would provide additional insight and improve inter-laboratory comparisons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial organs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14838\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14838","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
An enhanced and rapid method for von Willebrand factor multimer analysis for mechanical circulatory device testing.
Background: Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a critical glycoprotein in hemostasis and is an important factor in diagnosing bleeding disorders. Albeit the analysis of VWF is often compromised by inconsistent methodologies and challenges quantifying multimeric size. Current VWF multimer analysis methods are costly, time-consuming, and often inconsistent; thus, demanding skilled professionals. This study aimed to streamline and optimize the VWF multimer analysis technique, making it more efficient and reproducible, particularly for identifying or predicting mechanical circulatory support (MCS) induced bleeding disorders.
Methods: Blood samples from healthy volunteers were exposed to high shear forces via a Medtronic HeartWare ventricular assist device. VWF multimers were analyzed using vertical-gel agarose electrophoresis and Western blotting. Differences in VWF distribution were determined using densitometry, and two methods of densitometric analysis were compared: proprietary software against open-source software.
Results: Using the developed method: (i) protocol duration was accelerated from three days (in classical methods) to ~ eight hours; (ii) the resolution of the high molecular weight (HMW) VWF multimers were substantially improved; and (iii) densitometric analysis tools were validated. Additionally, the densitometry analysis using two software types showed a strong correlation between results, with the proprietary software reporting slightly higher HMW VWF percentages.
Conclusion: This methodology is recommended for affordable, accurate, and reproducible VWF multimer evaluations during MCS use and testing. Further research comparing this method with semi-automated methods would provide additional insight and improve inter-laboratory comparisons.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.