用于多发性硬化症个性化治疗的发病时血清生物标志物。

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1093/brain/awae260
Enric Monreal, José Ignacio Fernández-Velasco, Roberto Álvarez-Lafuente, Susana Sainz de la Maza, María Isabel García-Sánchez, Sara Llufriu, Bonaventura Casanova, Manuel Comabella, Sergio Martínez-Yélamos, Daniela Galimberti, Lluís Ramió-Torrentà, María Luisa Martínez-Ginés, Yolanda Aladro, Lucía Ayuso, José Enrique Martínez-Rodríguez, Luis Brieva, Noelia Villarrubia, Sara Eichau, Javier Zamora, Alexander Rodero-Romero, Mercedes Espiño, Yolanda Blanco, Albert Saiz, Xavier Montalbán, Mar Tintoré, María Inmaculada Domínguez-Mozo, Juan Pablo Cuello, Lucía Romero-Pinel, Laura Ghezzi, Belén Pilo de la Fuente, Francisco Pérez-Miralles, Ana Quiroga-Varela, Lluïsa Rubio, Fernando Rodríguez-Jorge, Juan Luís Chico-García, Raquel Sainz-Amo, Jaime Masjuan, Lucienne Costa-Frossard, Luisa M Villar
{"title":"用于多发性硬化症个性化治疗的发病时血清生物标志物。","authors":"Enric Monreal, José Ignacio Fernández-Velasco, Roberto Álvarez-Lafuente, Susana Sainz de la Maza, María Isabel García-Sánchez, Sara Llufriu, Bonaventura Casanova, Manuel Comabella, Sergio Martínez-Yélamos, Daniela Galimberti, Lluís Ramió-Torrentà, María Luisa Martínez-Ginés, Yolanda Aladro, Lucía Ayuso, José Enrique Martínez-Rodríguez, Luis Brieva, Noelia Villarrubia, Sara Eichau, Javier Zamora, Alexander Rodero-Romero, Mercedes Espiño, Yolanda Blanco, Albert Saiz, Xavier Montalbán, Mar Tintoré, María Inmaculada Domínguez-Mozo, Juan Pablo Cuello, Lucía Romero-Pinel, Laura Ghezzi, Belén Pilo de la Fuente, Francisco Pérez-Miralles, Ana Quiroga-Varela, Lluïsa Rubio, Fernando Rodríguez-Jorge, Juan Luís Chico-García, Raquel Sainz-Amo, Jaime Masjuan, Lucienne Costa-Frossard, Luisa M Villar","doi":"10.1093/brain/awae260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The potential for combining serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) levels to predict worsening disability in multiple sclerosis remains underexplored. We aimed to investigate whether sNfL and sGFAP values identify distinct subgroups of patients according to the risk of disability worsening and their response to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). This multicentre study, conducted across 13 European hospitals, spanned from 15 July 1994 to 18 August 2022, with follow-up until 26 September 2023. We enrolled patients with multiple sclerosis who had serum samples collected within 12 months from disease onset and before initiating DMTs. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate the risk of relapse-associated worsening (RAW), progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3. Of the 725 patients included, the median age was 34.2 (interquartile range, 27.6-42.4) years, and 509 patients (70.2%) were female. The median follow-up duration was 6.43 (interquartile range, 4.65-9.81) years. Higher sNfL values were associated with an elevated risk of RAW [hazard ratio (HR) of 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-1.76; P < 0.001], PIRA (HR of 1.43; 95% CI 1.13-1.81; P = 0.003) and reaching an EDSS of 3 (HR of 1.55; 95% CI 1.29-1.85; P < 0.001). Moreover, higher sGFAP levels were linked to a higher risk of achieving an EDSS score of 3 (HR of 1.36; 95% CI 1.06-1.74; P = 0.02) and, in patients with low sNfL values, to PIRA (HR of 1.86; 95% CI 1.01-3.45; P = 0.04). We also examined the combined effect of sNfL and sGFAP levels. Patients with low sNfL and sGFAP values exhibited a low risk of all outcomes and served as a reference. Untreated patients with high sNfL levels showed a higher risk of RAW, PIRA and reaching an EDSS of 3. Injectable or oral DMTs reduced the risk of RAW in these patients but failed to mitigate the risk of PIRA and reaching an EDSS of 3. Conversely, high-efficacy DMTs counteracted the heightened risk of these outcomes, except for the risk of PIRA in patients with high sNfL and sGFAP levels. Patients with low sNfL and high sGFAP values showed an increased risk of PIRA and achieving an EDSS of 3, which remained unchanged with either high-efficacy or other DMTs. In conclusion, evaluating sNfL and sGFAP levels at disease onset in multiple sclerosis might identify distinct phenotypes associated with diverse immunological pathways of disability acquisition and therapeutic response.</p>","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":" ","pages":"4084-4093"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serum biomarkers at disease onset for personalized therapy in multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Enric Monreal, José Ignacio Fernández-Velasco, Roberto Álvarez-Lafuente, Susana Sainz de la Maza, María Isabel García-Sánchez, Sara Llufriu, Bonaventura Casanova, Manuel Comabella, Sergio Martínez-Yélamos, Daniela Galimberti, Lluís Ramió-Torrentà, María Luisa Martínez-Ginés, Yolanda Aladro, Lucía Ayuso, José Enrique Martínez-Rodríguez, Luis Brieva, Noelia Villarrubia, Sara Eichau, Javier Zamora, Alexander Rodero-Romero, Mercedes Espiño, Yolanda Blanco, Albert Saiz, Xavier Montalbán, Mar Tintoré, María Inmaculada Domínguez-Mozo, Juan Pablo Cuello, Lucía Romero-Pinel, Laura Ghezzi, Belén Pilo de la Fuente, Francisco Pérez-Miralles, Ana Quiroga-Varela, Lluïsa Rubio, Fernando Rodríguez-Jorge, Juan Luís Chico-García, Raquel Sainz-Amo, Jaime Masjuan, Lucienne Costa-Frossard, Luisa M Villar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/brain/awae260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The potential for combining serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) levels to predict worsening disability in multiple sclerosis remains underexplored. We aimed to investigate whether sNfL and sGFAP values identify distinct subgroups of patients according to the risk of disability worsening and their response to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). This multicentre study, conducted across 13 European hospitals, spanned from 15 July 1994 to 18 August 2022, with follow-up until 26 September 2023. We enrolled patients with multiple sclerosis who had serum samples collected within 12 months from disease onset and before initiating DMTs. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate the risk of relapse-associated worsening (RAW), progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3. Of the 725 patients included, the median age was 34.2 (interquartile range, 27.6-42.4) years, and 509 patients (70.2%) were female. The median follow-up duration was 6.43 (interquartile range, 4.65-9.81) years. Higher sNfL values were associated with an elevated risk of RAW [hazard ratio (HR) of 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-1.76; P < 0.001], PIRA (HR of 1.43; 95% CI 1.13-1.81; P = 0.003) and reaching an EDSS of 3 (HR of 1.55; 95% CI 1.29-1.85; P < 0.001). Moreover, higher sGFAP levels were linked to a higher risk of achieving an EDSS score of 3 (HR of 1.36; 95% CI 1.06-1.74; P = 0.02) and, in patients with low sNfL values, to PIRA (HR of 1.86; 95% CI 1.01-3.45; P = 0.04). We also examined the combined effect of sNfL and sGFAP levels. Patients with low sNfL and sGFAP values exhibited a low risk of all outcomes and served as a reference. Untreated patients with high sNfL levels showed a higher risk of RAW, PIRA and reaching an EDSS of 3. Injectable or oral DMTs reduced the risk of RAW in these patients but failed to mitigate the risk of PIRA and reaching an EDSS of 3. Conversely, high-efficacy DMTs counteracted the heightened risk of these outcomes, except for the risk of PIRA in patients with high sNfL and sGFAP levels. Patients with low sNfL and high sGFAP values showed an increased risk of PIRA and achieving an EDSS of 3, which remained unchanged with either high-efficacy or other DMTs. In conclusion, evaluating sNfL and sGFAP levels at disease onset in multiple sclerosis might identify distinct phenotypes associated with diverse immunological pathways of disability acquisition and therapeutic response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4084-4093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae260\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae260","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结合血清神经丝蛋白轻链(sNfL)和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(sGFAP)水平预测多发性硬化症(MS)残疾恶化的潜力仍未得到充分探索。我们的目的是研究 sNfL 和 sGFAP 值是否能根据残疾恶化风险及其对疾病改变治疗(DMT)的反应识别出不同的患者亚组。这项多中心研究在欧洲十三家医院进行,时间跨度为 1994 年 7 月 15 日至 2022 年 8 月 18 日,随访至 2023 年 9 月 26 日。我们招募了在发病后 12 个月内和开始使用 DMTs 之前采集血清样本的多发性硬化症患者。多变量回归模型用于估算复发相关恶化(RAW)、独立于复发活动的进展(PIRA)和扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)3分的风险。在纳入的725名患者中,中位年龄为34.2岁(IQR,27.6-42.4),509名患者(70.2%)为女性。中位随访时间为 6.43 年(IQR,4.65-9.81)。较高的 sNfL 值与 RAW(HR 为 1.45;95% CI 为 1.19-1.76;P < 0.001)、PIRA(HR 为 1.43;95% CI 为 1.13-1.81;P = 0.003)和 EDSS 达到 3(HR 为 1.55;95% CI 为 1.29-1.85;P < 0.001)的风险升高相关。此外,sGFAP 水平越高,EDSS 达到 3 分的风险越高(HR 为 1.36;95% CI 为 1.06-1.74;P = 0.02),对于 sNfL 值较低的患者,PIRA 的风险也越高(HR 为 1.86;95% CI 为 1.01-3.45;P = 0.04)。我们进一步研究了 sNfL 和 sGFAP 水平的综合影响。sNfL 和 sGFAP 值较低的患者(NLGL)出现所有结果的风险较低,可作为参照。未经治疗的高 sNfL 水平患者发生 RAW、PIRA 和 EDSS 达到 3 级的风险较高。注射或口服 DMT 可降低这些患者发生 RAW 的风险,但无法降低 PIRA 和 EDSS 达到 3 级的风险。相反,高效 DMT 可抵消这些结果的高风险,但高 sNfL 和 sGFAP 水平患者发生 PIRA 的风险除外。低 sNfL 值和高 sGFAP 值(NLGH)患者出现 PIRA 和 EDSS 达到 3 的风险增加,但无论使用高效 DMT 还是其他 DMT,风险均保持不变。总之,在多发性硬化症发病时评估 sNfL 和 sGFAP 水平可能会发现与致残和治疗反应的不同免疫途径相关的不同表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Serum biomarkers at disease onset for personalized therapy in multiple sclerosis.

The potential for combining serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) levels to predict worsening disability in multiple sclerosis remains underexplored. We aimed to investigate whether sNfL and sGFAP values identify distinct subgroups of patients according to the risk of disability worsening and their response to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). This multicentre study, conducted across 13 European hospitals, spanned from 15 July 1994 to 18 August 2022, with follow-up until 26 September 2023. We enrolled patients with multiple sclerosis who had serum samples collected within 12 months from disease onset and before initiating DMTs. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate the risk of relapse-associated worsening (RAW), progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3. Of the 725 patients included, the median age was 34.2 (interquartile range, 27.6-42.4) years, and 509 patients (70.2%) were female. The median follow-up duration was 6.43 (interquartile range, 4.65-9.81) years. Higher sNfL values were associated with an elevated risk of RAW [hazard ratio (HR) of 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-1.76; P < 0.001], PIRA (HR of 1.43; 95% CI 1.13-1.81; P = 0.003) and reaching an EDSS of 3 (HR of 1.55; 95% CI 1.29-1.85; P < 0.001). Moreover, higher sGFAP levels were linked to a higher risk of achieving an EDSS score of 3 (HR of 1.36; 95% CI 1.06-1.74; P = 0.02) and, in patients with low sNfL values, to PIRA (HR of 1.86; 95% CI 1.01-3.45; P = 0.04). We also examined the combined effect of sNfL and sGFAP levels. Patients with low sNfL and sGFAP values exhibited a low risk of all outcomes and served as a reference. Untreated patients with high sNfL levels showed a higher risk of RAW, PIRA and reaching an EDSS of 3. Injectable or oral DMTs reduced the risk of RAW in these patients but failed to mitigate the risk of PIRA and reaching an EDSS of 3. Conversely, high-efficacy DMTs counteracted the heightened risk of these outcomes, except for the risk of PIRA in patients with high sNfL and sGFAP levels. Patients with low sNfL and high sGFAP values showed an increased risk of PIRA and achieving an EDSS of 3, which remained unchanged with either high-efficacy or other DMTs. In conclusion, evaluating sNfL and sGFAP levels at disease onset in multiple sclerosis might identify distinct phenotypes associated with diverse immunological pathways of disability acquisition and therapeutic response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
期刊最新文献
Plasma phosphorylated tau217 strongly associates with memory deficits in the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum Correction to: Bidirectional gut-to-brain and brain-to-gut propagation of synucleinopathy in non-human primates. Reshaping computational neuropsychiatry beyond synaptopathy. Trigeminal nerve microstructure is linked with neuroinflammation and brainstem activity in migraine. Transthyretin variants impact blood–nerve barrier and neuroinflammation in amyloidotic neuropathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1