首发精神病患者耐药风险临床预测模型的开发和初步评估:精神分裂症抗药性预测模型(SPIRIT)。

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY British Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1192/bjp.2024.101
Saeed Farooq, Miriam Hattle, Tom Kingstone, Olesya Ajnakina, Paola Dazzan, Arsime Demjaha, Robin M Murray, Marta Di Forti, Peter B Jones, Gillian A Doody, David Shiers, Gabrielle Andrews, Abbie Milner, Maria Antonietta Nettis, Andrew J Lawrence, Danielle A van der Windt, Richard D Riley
{"title":"首发精神病患者耐药风险临床预测模型的开发和初步评估:精神分裂症抗药性预测模型(SPIRIT)。","authors":"Saeed Farooq, Miriam Hattle, Tom Kingstone, Olesya Ajnakina, Paola Dazzan, Arsime Demjaha, Robin M Murray, Marta Di Forti, Peter B Jones, Gillian A Doody, David Shiers, Gabrielle Andrews, Abbie Milner, Maria Antonietta Nettis, Andrew J Lawrence, Danielle A van der Windt, Richard D Riley","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2024.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A clinical tool to estimate the risk of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) would inform early detection of TRS and overcome the delay of up to 5 years in starting TRS medication.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop and evaluate a model that could predict the risk of TRS in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used data from two UK-based FEP cohorts (GAP and AESOP-10) to develop and internally validate a prognostic model that supports identification of patients at high-risk of TRS soon after FEP diagnosis. Using sociodemographic and clinical predictors, a model for predicting risk of TRS was developed based on penalised logistic regression, with missing data handled using multiple imputation. Internal validation was undertaken via bootstrapping, obtaining optimism-adjusted estimates of the model's performance. Interviews and focus groups with clinicians were conducted to establish clinically relevant risk thresholds and understand the acceptability and perceived utility of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included seven factors in the prediction model that are predominantly assessed in clinical practice in patients with FEP. The model predicted treatment resistance among the 1081 patients with reasonable accuracy; the model's C-statistic was 0.727 (95% CI 0.723-0.732) prior to shrinkage and 0.687 after adjustment for optimism. Calibration was good (expected/observed ratio: 0.999; calibration-in-the-large: 0.000584) after adjustment for optimism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed and internally validated a prediction model with reasonably good predictive metrics. Clinicians, patients and carers were involved in the development process. External validation of the tool is needed followed by co-design methodology to support implementation in early intervention services.</p>","PeriodicalId":9259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and initial evaluation of a clinical prediction model for risk of treatment resistance in first-episode psychosis: Schizophrenia Prediction of Resistance to Treatment (SPIRIT).\",\"authors\":\"Saeed Farooq, Miriam Hattle, Tom Kingstone, Olesya Ajnakina, Paola Dazzan, Arsime Demjaha, Robin M Murray, Marta Di Forti, Peter B Jones, Gillian A Doody, David Shiers, Gabrielle Andrews, Abbie Milner, Maria Antonietta Nettis, Andrew J Lawrence, Danielle A van der Windt, Richard D Riley\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjp.2024.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A clinical tool to estimate the risk of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) would inform early detection of TRS and overcome the delay of up to 5 years in starting TRS medication.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop and evaluate a model that could predict the risk of TRS in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used data from two UK-based FEP cohorts (GAP and AESOP-10) to develop and internally validate a prognostic model that supports identification of patients at high-risk of TRS soon after FEP diagnosis. Using sociodemographic and clinical predictors, a model for predicting risk of TRS was developed based on penalised logistic regression, with missing data handled using multiple imputation. Internal validation was undertaken via bootstrapping, obtaining optimism-adjusted estimates of the model's performance. Interviews and focus groups with clinicians were conducted to establish clinically relevant risk thresholds and understand the acceptability and perceived utility of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included seven factors in the prediction model that are predominantly assessed in clinical practice in patients with FEP. The model predicted treatment resistance among the 1081 patients with reasonable accuracy; the model's C-statistic was 0.727 (95% CI 0.723-0.732) prior to shrinkage and 0.687 after adjustment for optimism. Calibration was good (expected/observed ratio: 0.999; calibration-in-the-large: 0.000584) after adjustment for optimism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed and internally validated a prediction model with reasonably good predictive metrics. Clinicians, patients and carers were involved in the development process. External validation of the tool is needed followed by co-design methodology to support implementation in early intervention services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536189/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.101\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.101","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:开发并评估一种可在常规临床实践中预测耐药精神分裂症(TRS)风险的模型:我们利用英国两个 FEP 队列(GAP 和 AESOP-10)的数据,开发并在内部验证了一个预后模型,该模型可在 FEP 诊断后不久识别出 TRS 高危患者。利用社会人口学和临床预测因子,在惩罚性逻辑回归的基础上建立了一个预测 TRS 风险的模型,并使用多重归因法处理缺失数据。通过引导法进行了内部验证,获得了模型性能的乐观调整估计值。对临床医生进行了访谈和焦点小组讨论,以确定与临床相关的风险阈值,并了解模型的可接受性和感知效用:结果:我们在预测模型中加入了七个因素,这些因素在临床实践中主要用于评估 FEP 患者。该模型预测了 1081 名患者的治疗耐药性,准确度较高;模型的 C 统计量在缩小前为 0.727(95% CI 0.723-0.732),在调整乐观程度后为 0.687。在对乐观程度进行调整后,校准结果良好(预期/观测比:0.999;大校准:0.000584):我们开发并在内部验证了一个预测模型,其预测指标相当不错。临床医生、患者和护理人员都参与了开发过程。需要对该工具进行外部验证,然后采用共同设计的方法来支持早期干预服务的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and initial evaluation of a clinical prediction model for risk of treatment resistance in first-episode psychosis: Schizophrenia Prediction of Resistance to Treatment (SPIRIT).

Background: A clinical tool to estimate the risk of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) would inform early detection of TRS and overcome the delay of up to 5 years in starting TRS medication.

Aims: To develop and evaluate a model that could predict the risk of TRS in routine clinical practice.

Method: We used data from two UK-based FEP cohorts (GAP and AESOP-10) to develop and internally validate a prognostic model that supports identification of patients at high-risk of TRS soon after FEP diagnosis. Using sociodemographic and clinical predictors, a model for predicting risk of TRS was developed based on penalised logistic regression, with missing data handled using multiple imputation. Internal validation was undertaken via bootstrapping, obtaining optimism-adjusted estimates of the model's performance. Interviews and focus groups with clinicians were conducted to establish clinically relevant risk thresholds and understand the acceptability and perceived utility of the model.

Results: We included seven factors in the prediction model that are predominantly assessed in clinical practice in patients with FEP. The model predicted treatment resistance among the 1081 patients with reasonable accuracy; the model's C-statistic was 0.727 (95% CI 0.723-0.732) prior to shrinkage and 0.687 after adjustment for optimism. Calibration was good (expected/observed ratio: 0.999; calibration-in-the-large: 0.000584) after adjustment for optimism.

Conclusions: We developed and internally validated a prediction model with reasonably good predictive metrics. Clinicians, patients and carers were involved in the development process. External validation of the tool is needed followed by co-design methodology to support implementation in early intervention services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Psychiatry
British Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychiatry (BJPsych) is a renowned international journal that undergoes rigorous peer review. It covers various branches of psychiatry, with a specific focus on the clinical aspects of each topic. Published monthly by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, this journal is dedicated to enhancing the prevention, investigation, diagnosis, treatment, and care of mental illness worldwide. It also strives to promote global mental health. In addition to featuring authoritative original research articles from across the globe, the journal includes editorials, review articles, commentaries on contentious issues, a comprehensive book review section, and a dynamic correspondence column. BJPsych is an essential source of information for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and other professionals interested in mental health.
期刊最新文献
Detection of suicidality from medical text using privacy-preserving large language models. Breast cancer risk among women with schizophrenia and association with duration of antipsychotic use: population-based cohort study in South Korea. Equal, equitable or exacerbating inequalities: patterns and predictors of social prescribing referrals in 160 128 UK patients. Apotychiaphobia: should there be a term for fear of miscarriage? Association between dietary fat intake and the risk of Alzheimer's disease: Mendelian randomisation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1