设计工人幸福感测试系统:第一波筑波致富职业队列研究。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1265/ehpm.23-00372
Shotaro Doki, Daisuke Hori, Tsukasa Takahashi, Kei Muroi, Mami Ishitsuka, Asako Matsuura, Hotaka Tsukada, Wakako Migaki, Norishige Kanai, Yu Ikeda, Soshi Takao, Ichiyo Matsuzaki, Shin-Ichiro Sasahara
{"title":"设计工人幸福感测试系统:第一波筑波致富职业队列研究。","authors":"Shotaro Doki, Daisuke Hori, Tsukasa Takahashi, Kei Muroi, Mami Ishitsuka, Asako Matsuura, Hotaka Tsukada, Wakako Migaki, Norishige Kanai, Yu Ikeda, Soshi Takao, Ichiyo Matsuzaki, Shin-Ichiro Sasahara","doi":"10.1265/ehpm.23-00372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, there has been a diversification of working styles. The concept of workers' well-being is no longer limited to material wealth, such as how satisfied they are with their wages. Psychological enrichment, encompassing factors like motivation and interpersonal relationships, is also important. This study was established to develop a scale to evaluate the well-being of workers, named the Abundance Index for Workers (AIW). This new concept proposed by the authors comprehensively considers both job-related resources and personal and societal resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was carried out as part of the Tsukuba Salutogenic Occupational Cohort Study (T-SOCS). We utilized data from a survey targeting workers affiliated with institutions under the Tsukuba Science City Network, examining aspects of their daily life, work, and mental health. The deviation scores for each survey item were averaged to calculate an overall score. The correlations of the comprehensive score with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) index for depression and the Single-item Presenteeism Question (SPQ) index for presenteeism were analyzed to determine criterion-related validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of participants analyzed was 2,745. Factor analysis categorized the data into three factors: workplace mental health, societal resources, and lifestyle habits. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.688. There were correlations of -0.363 (p < 0.001) between the total score and SPQ, and -0.558 (p < 0.001) between the total score and PHQ-9, suggesting a degree of criterion-related validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we designed a test battery that assesses workers' well-being based on job-related resources and the richness of societal resources. The internal consistency of this battery was not as high as expected due to the broad scope of well-being. Although it is difficult to evaluate workers' well-being on a single scale, we believe that the AIW functions well as a test battery by combining scales with different attributes, which enables well-being to be captured from as many different perspectives as possible. This tool is designed to assist individuals in evaluating their own well-being and recognizing factors that can enhance it.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable; this study is not an intervention trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":11707,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine","volume":"29 ","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a test battery for workers' well-being: the first wave of the Tsukuba Salutogenic Occupational Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Shotaro Doki, Daisuke Hori, Tsukasa Takahashi, Kei Muroi, Mami Ishitsuka, Asako Matsuura, Hotaka Tsukada, Wakako Migaki, Norishige Kanai, Yu Ikeda, Soshi Takao, Ichiyo Matsuzaki, Shin-Ichiro Sasahara\",\"doi\":\"10.1265/ehpm.23-00372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, there has been a diversification of working styles. The concept of workers' well-being is no longer limited to material wealth, such as how satisfied they are with their wages. Psychological enrichment, encompassing factors like motivation and interpersonal relationships, is also important. This study was established to develop a scale to evaluate the well-being of workers, named the Abundance Index for Workers (AIW). This new concept proposed by the authors comprehensively considers both job-related resources and personal and societal resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was carried out as part of the Tsukuba Salutogenic Occupational Cohort Study (T-SOCS). We utilized data from a survey targeting workers affiliated with institutions under the Tsukuba Science City Network, examining aspects of their daily life, work, and mental health. The deviation scores for each survey item were averaged to calculate an overall score. The correlations of the comprehensive score with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) index for depression and the Single-item Presenteeism Question (SPQ) index for presenteeism were analyzed to determine criterion-related validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of participants analyzed was 2,745. Factor analysis categorized the data into three factors: workplace mental health, societal resources, and lifestyle habits. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.688. There were correlations of -0.363 (p < 0.001) between the total score and SPQ, and -0.558 (p < 0.001) between the total score and PHQ-9, suggesting a degree of criterion-related validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we designed a test battery that assesses workers' well-being based on job-related resources and the richness of societal resources. The internal consistency of this battery was not as high as expected due to the broad scope of well-being. Although it is difficult to evaluate workers' well-being on a single scale, we believe that the AIW functions well as a test battery by combining scales with different attributes, which enables well-being to be captured from as many different perspectives as possible. This tool is designed to assist individuals in evaluating their own well-being and recognizing factors that can enhance it.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable; this study is not an intervention trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310558/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.23-00372\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.23-00372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,工作方式出现了多样化。工人福祉的概念不再局限于物质财富,如他们对工资的满意程度。心理充实也很重要,包括工作动力和人际关系等因素。本研究的目的是制定一个评估工人幸福感的量表,命名为 "工人富足指数"(AIW)。作者提出的这一新概念全面考虑了与工作相关的资源以及个人和社会资源:本研究是筑波致富职业队列研究(T-SOCS)的一部分。我们利用以筑波科学城网络下属机构的工作人员为对象的调查数据,对他们的日常生活、工作和心理健康等方面进行了调查。将每个调查项目的偏差分取平均值,计算出综合得分。分析了综合得分与患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)抑郁指数和单项旷工问题(SPQ)旷工指数的相关性,以确定标准相关有效性:分析的参与者人数为 2,745 人。因子分析将数据分为三个因子:职场心理健康、社会资源和生活习惯。Cronbach的α系数为0.688。总分与 SPQ 之间的相关系数为-0.363(P < 0.001),总分与 PHQ-9 之间的相关系数为-0.558(P < 0.001),这表明问卷具有一定程度的标准相关效度:在这项研究中,我们设计了一套测试,根据与工作相关的资源和社会资源的丰富程度来评估工人的幸福感。由于幸福感的范围较广,因此该测验组的内部一致性没有预期的高。尽管很难用一个量表来评估工人的幸福感,但我们相信,通过将不同属性的量表结合在一起,AIW 可以很好地发挥测试功能,从而从尽可能多的不同角度来反映工人的幸福感。该工具旨在帮助个人评估自己的幸福感,并认识到可以提高幸福感的因素:不适用;本研究并非干预试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing a test battery for workers' well-being: the first wave of the Tsukuba Salutogenic Occupational Cohort Study.

Background: In recent years, there has been a diversification of working styles. The concept of workers' well-being is no longer limited to material wealth, such as how satisfied they are with their wages. Psychological enrichment, encompassing factors like motivation and interpersonal relationships, is also important. This study was established to develop a scale to evaluate the well-being of workers, named the Abundance Index for Workers (AIW). This new concept proposed by the authors comprehensively considers both job-related resources and personal and societal resources.

Methods: This study was carried out as part of the Tsukuba Salutogenic Occupational Cohort Study (T-SOCS). We utilized data from a survey targeting workers affiliated with institutions under the Tsukuba Science City Network, examining aspects of their daily life, work, and mental health. The deviation scores for each survey item were averaged to calculate an overall score. The correlations of the comprehensive score with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) index for depression and the Single-item Presenteeism Question (SPQ) index for presenteeism were analyzed to determine criterion-related validity.

Results: The number of participants analyzed was 2,745. Factor analysis categorized the data into three factors: workplace mental health, societal resources, and lifestyle habits. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.688. There were correlations of -0.363 (p < 0.001) between the total score and SPQ, and -0.558 (p < 0.001) between the total score and PHQ-9, suggesting a degree of criterion-related validity.

Conclusions: In this study, we designed a test battery that assesses workers' well-being based on job-related resources and the richness of societal resources. The internal consistency of this battery was not as high as expected due to the broad scope of well-being. Although it is difficult to evaluate workers' well-being on a single scale, we believe that the AIW functions well as a test battery by combining scales with different attributes, which enables well-being to be captured from as many different perspectives as possible. This tool is designed to assist individuals in evaluating their own well-being and recognizing factors that can enhance it.

Trial registration: Not applicable; this study is not an intervention trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese Society for Hygiene, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine (EHPM) brings a comprehensive approach to prevention and environmental health related to medical, biological, molecular biological, genetic, physical, psychosocial, chemical, and other environmental factors. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine features definitive studies on human health sciences and provides comprehensive and unique information to a worldwide readership.
期刊最新文献
Association between temperature and mortality: a multi-city time series study in Sichuan Basin, southwest China. Presenteeism and social interaction in the "new normal" in Japan: a longitudinal questionnaire study. Seasonal variations of the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its markers using big-data of health check-ups. Challenges in health risk assessment of multiple chemical exposures in epidemiological studies. Not only baseline but cumulative exposure of remnant cholesterol predicts the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1