在两种不同放牧系统下饲养的 Nguni 和 Bonsmara 奶牛瘤胃内容物特征的比较。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-06-08 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.5455/javar.2024.k783
Denis Kayima, Mhlangabezi Slayi, Ishmael Festus Jaja, Cletos Mapiye, Kennedy Dzama
{"title":"在两种不同放牧系统下饲养的 Nguni 和 Bonsmara 奶牛瘤胃内容物特征的比较。","authors":"Denis Kayima, Mhlangabezi Slayi, Ishmael Festus Jaja, Cletos Mapiye, Kennedy Dzama","doi":"10.5455/javar.2024.k783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate rumen fermentation parameters influenced by both grazing system and breed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 2 × 2 factorial design was employed, involving 40 cows with matched age, parity, and physiological status. The cows were evenly divided between Bonsmara and Nguni breeds, as well as communal and commercial grazing systems. Rumen fluid samples were collected and analyzed for parameters including ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N), pH, temperature, and volatile fatty acids (VFAs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nguni cows exhibited significantly higher ruminal NH3-N levels (<i>p <</i> 0.05) compared to Bonsmara, ranging from 69.05 to 96.78 mg/l. Commercial grazing demonstrated significantly higher NH3-N concentrations (<i>p <</i> 0.05) than communal grazing. Ruminal pH, temperature, total VFAs, and specific VFAs (Iso-butyrate, valeric, and iso-valeric) did not show significant differences (<i>p ></i> 0.05). However, total VFAs were slightly lower in communal grazing (78.87 mmol/l) than in commercial grazing (89.80 mmol/l). Acetate, propionate, butyrate, and the acetate to propionate ratio did not display significant differences (<i>p ></i> 0.05) between breeds but varied between grazing systems. Communal systems had higher acetate and acetate to propionate ratio (<i>p <</i> 0.05), while commercial systems showed higher propionate and butyrate levels (<i>p <</i> 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Grazing conditions significantly influenced rumen fermentation parameters, irrespective of breed. Further research is necessary to explore the relationship between forage conditions, diversity, and rumen fermentation within different grazing systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of rumen contents' characteristics in Nguni and Bonsmara cows raised under two different grazing systems.\",\"authors\":\"Denis Kayima, Mhlangabezi Slayi, Ishmael Festus Jaja, Cletos Mapiye, Kennedy Dzama\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/javar.2024.k783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate rumen fermentation parameters influenced by both grazing system and breed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 2 × 2 factorial design was employed, involving 40 cows with matched age, parity, and physiological status. The cows were evenly divided between Bonsmara and Nguni breeds, as well as communal and commercial grazing systems. Rumen fluid samples were collected and analyzed for parameters including ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N), pH, temperature, and volatile fatty acids (VFAs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nguni cows exhibited significantly higher ruminal NH3-N levels (<i>p <</i> 0.05) compared to Bonsmara, ranging from 69.05 to 96.78 mg/l. Commercial grazing demonstrated significantly higher NH3-N concentrations (<i>p <</i> 0.05) than communal grazing. Ruminal pH, temperature, total VFAs, and specific VFAs (Iso-butyrate, valeric, and iso-valeric) did not show significant differences (<i>p ></i> 0.05). However, total VFAs were slightly lower in communal grazing (78.87 mmol/l) than in commercial grazing (89.80 mmol/l). Acetate, propionate, butyrate, and the acetate to propionate ratio did not display significant differences (<i>p ></i> 0.05) between breeds but varied between grazing systems. Communal systems had higher acetate and acetate to propionate ratio (<i>p <</i> 0.05), while commercial systems showed higher propionate and butyrate levels (<i>p <</i> 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Grazing conditions significantly influenced rumen fermentation parameters, irrespective of breed. Further research is necessary to explore the relationship between forage conditions, diversity, and rumen fermentation within different grazing systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296167/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2024.k783\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2024.k783","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估瘤胃发酵参数受放牧系统和品种的影响:采用 2 × 2 因式设计,40 头奶牛的年龄、产仔数和生理状况相匹配。这些奶牛被平均分为 Bonsmara 和 Nguni 两个品种,以及公共放牧系统和商业放牧系统。采集的瘤胃液样本分析了氨氮(NH3-N)、pH值、温度和挥发性脂肪酸(VFAs)等参数:与 Bonsmara 相比,Nguni 奶牛的瘤胃 NH3-N 水平明显更高(p 0.05),从 69.05 毫克/升到 96.78 毫克/升不等。商业放牧的 NH3-N 浓度明显高于集体放牧(P 0.05)。反刍动物的 pH 值、温度、总挥发性脂肪酸和特定挥发性脂肪酸(异丁酸酯、戊酸酯和异戊酸酯)未显示出显著差异(p > 0.05)。不过,集体放牧的总挥发性脂肪酸(78.87 毫摩尔/升)略低于商业放牧(89.80 毫摩尔/升)。乙酸盐、丙酸盐、丁酸盐以及乙酸盐与丙酸盐的比率在不同品种之间没有显著差异(p > 0.05),但在不同放牧系统之间存在差异。公共放牧系统的醋酸盐和醋酸盐与丙酸盐的比率较高(p 0.05),而商业放牧系统的丙酸盐和丁酸盐水平较高(p 0.05):结论:放牧条件对瘤胃发酵参数有很大影响,与品种无关。有必要进一步研究不同放牧系统中饲草条件、多样性和瘤胃发酵之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of rumen contents' characteristics in Nguni and Bonsmara cows raised under two different grazing systems.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate rumen fermentation parameters influenced by both grazing system and breed.

Materials and methods: A 2 × 2 factorial design was employed, involving 40 cows with matched age, parity, and physiological status. The cows were evenly divided between Bonsmara and Nguni breeds, as well as communal and commercial grazing systems. Rumen fluid samples were collected and analyzed for parameters including ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N), pH, temperature, and volatile fatty acids (VFAs).

Results: Nguni cows exhibited significantly higher ruminal NH3-N levels (p < 0.05) compared to Bonsmara, ranging from 69.05 to 96.78 mg/l. Commercial grazing demonstrated significantly higher NH3-N concentrations (p < 0.05) than communal grazing. Ruminal pH, temperature, total VFAs, and specific VFAs (Iso-butyrate, valeric, and iso-valeric) did not show significant differences (p > 0.05). However, total VFAs were slightly lower in communal grazing (78.87 mmol/l) than in commercial grazing (89.80 mmol/l). Acetate, propionate, butyrate, and the acetate to propionate ratio did not display significant differences (p > 0.05) between breeds but varied between grazing systems. Communal systems had higher acetate and acetate to propionate ratio (p < 0.05), while commercial systems showed higher propionate and butyrate levels (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Grazing conditions significantly influenced rumen fermentation parameters, irrespective of breed. Further research is necessary to explore the relationship between forage conditions, diversity, and rumen fermentation within different grazing systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Differential Costs of Raising Grandchildren on Older Mother-Adult Child Relations in Black and White Families. Does Resilience Mediate the Relationship Between Negative Self-Image and Psychological Distress in Middle-Aged and Older Gay and Bisexual Men? Intergenerational Relations and Well-being Among Older Middle Eastern/Arab American Immigrants During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Caregiving Appraisals and Emotional Valence: Moderating Effects of Activity Participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1