下ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者近端右冠状动脉闭塞与非近端右冠状动脉闭塞的临床疗效比较。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.07.007
Koudai Hamaguchi, Kenichi Sakakura, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Yousuke Taniguchi, Kei Yamamoto, Takunori Tsukui, Masashi Hatori, Taku Kasahara, Yusuke Watanabe, Shun Ishibashi, Masaru Seguchi, Hideo Fujita
{"title":"下ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者近端右冠状动脉闭塞与非近端右冠状动脉闭塞的临床疗效比较。","authors":"Koudai Hamaguchi, Kenichi Sakakura, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Yousuke Taniguchi, Kei Yamamoto, Takunori Tsukui, Masashi Hatori, Taku Kasahara, Yusuke Watanabe, Shun Ishibashi, Masaru Seguchi, Hideo Fujita","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to the occlusion of left coronary artery are worse in patients with proximal occlusion than in those with non-proximal occlusion. However, there are few reports that focus on the comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI between proximal and non-proximal right coronary artery (RCA) occlusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 356 patients with STEMI whose infarct-related artery is RCA and divided them into the proximal group (n = 129) and the non-proximal group (n = 227). We defined segment 1 of RCA as proximal, and segments 2, 3, and 4 as non-proximal according to the reporting system of the American Heart Association. The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE), which was defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, readmission for heart failure, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Incidence of shock at admission, requirement for catecholamine during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or mechanical support during PCI tended to be higher in the proximal group (42.6 %) than in the non-proximal group (33.5 %) (p = 0.088). Although the incidence of right ventricular infarction tended to be higher in the proximal group (17.8 %) than in the non-proximal group (10.6 %) without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.072), the incidence of in-hospital death was similar between the 2 groups (1.6 % versus 1.8 %, p = 1.000). The MACE-free survival curves were not different between the 2 groups (p = 0.400). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE (HR 1.095, 95%CI 0.691-1.737, p = 0.699).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the acute phase conditions such as shock or right ventricular infarction tended to be more severe in patients with proximal occlusion, overall clinical outcomes including long-term outcomes were comparable between the proximal and distal RCA occlusions. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE after hospital discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of clinical outcomes between proximal and non-proximal right coronary artery occlusion in patients with inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Koudai Hamaguchi, Kenichi Sakakura, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Yousuke Taniguchi, Kei Yamamoto, Takunori Tsukui, Masashi Hatori, Taku Kasahara, Yusuke Watanabe, Shun Ishibashi, Masaru Seguchi, Hideo Fujita\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.07.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to the occlusion of left coronary artery are worse in patients with proximal occlusion than in those with non-proximal occlusion. However, there are few reports that focus on the comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI between proximal and non-proximal right coronary artery (RCA) occlusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 356 patients with STEMI whose infarct-related artery is RCA and divided them into the proximal group (n = 129) and the non-proximal group (n = 227). We defined segment 1 of RCA as proximal, and segments 2, 3, and 4 as non-proximal according to the reporting system of the American Heart Association. The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE), which was defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, readmission for heart failure, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Incidence of shock at admission, requirement for catecholamine during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or mechanical support during PCI tended to be higher in the proximal group (42.6 %) than in the non-proximal group (33.5 %) (p = 0.088). Although the incidence of right ventricular infarction tended to be higher in the proximal group (17.8 %) than in the non-proximal group (10.6 %) without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.072), the incidence of in-hospital death was similar between the 2 groups (1.6 % versus 1.8 %, p = 1.000). The MACE-free survival curves were not different between the 2 groups (p = 0.400). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE (HR 1.095, 95%CI 0.691-1.737, p = 0.699).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the acute phase conditions such as shock or right ventricular infarction tended to be more severe in patients with proximal occlusion, overall clinical outcomes including long-term outcomes were comparable between the proximal and distal RCA occlusions. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE after hospital discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.07.007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.07.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左冠状动脉近端闭塞的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的临床预后比非近端闭塞的患者差。然而,很少有报告关注 STEMI 患者近端和非近端右冠状动脉(RCA)闭塞的临床预后比较:我们纳入了 356 名梗死相关动脉为 RCA 的 STEMI 患者,并将其分为近端组(129 人)和非近端组(227 人)。根据美国心脏协会的报告系统,我们将 RCA 第 1 段定义为近端,第 2、3 和 4 段定义为非近端。主要终点是主要心血管事件(MACE),其定义为全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、心衰再入院和缺血驱动的靶血管再通术的综合结果:入院时休克、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间需要儿茶酚胺或PCI期间需要机械支持的发生率,近端组(42.6%)往往高于非近端组(33.5%)(P = 0.088)。虽然近端组(17.8%)的右心室梗死发生率往往高于非近端组(10.6%),但未达到统计学意义(p = 0.072),两组的院内死亡发生率相似(1.6% 对 1.8%,p = 1.000)。两组的无MACE生存曲线无差异(p = 0.400)。多变量 Cox 危险分析显示,近端 RCA 闭塞与 MACE 无关(HR 1.095,95%CI 0.691-1.737,p = 0.699):尽管近端闭塞患者的休克或右心室梗死等急性期症状往往更严重,但RCA近端闭塞和远端闭塞患者的总体临床结果(包括长期结果)相当。此外,多变量分析表明,RCA近端闭塞与出院后的MACE无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of clinical outcomes between proximal and non-proximal right coronary artery occlusion in patients with inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Background: The clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to the occlusion of left coronary artery are worse in patients with proximal occlusion than in those with non-proximal occlusion. However, there are few reports that focus on the comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI between proximal and non-proximal right coronary artery (RCA) occlusions.

Methods: We included 356 patients with STEMI whose infarct-related artery is RCA and divided them into the proximal group (n = 129) and the non-proximal group (n = 227). We defined segment 1 of RCA as proximal, and segments 2, 3, and 4 as non-proximal according to the reporting system of the American Heart Association. The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE), which was defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, readmission for heart failure, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.

Results: Incidence of shock at admission, requirement for catecholamine during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or mechanical support during PCI tended to be higher in the proximal group (42.6 %) than in the non-proximal group (33.5 %) (p = 0.088). Although the incidence of right ventricular infarction tended to be higher in the proximal group (17.8 %) than in the non-proximal group (10.6 %) without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.072), the incidence of in-hospital death was similar between the 2 groups (1.6 % versus 1.8 %, p = 1.000). The MACE-free survival curves were not different between the 2 groups (p = 0.400). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE (HR 1.095, 95%CI 0.691-1.737, p = 0.699).

Conclusions: Although the acute phase conditions such as shock or right ventricular infarction tended to be more severe in patients with proximal occlusion, overall clinical outcomes including long-term outcomes were comparable between the proximal and distal RCA occlusions. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE after hospital discharge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cardiology
Journal of cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Associations of adipose tissue depots with cardiac resynchronization therapy response and clinical outcomes: A CRT-HF Clinic substudy. Association between complementary use of Goreisan (a Japanese herbal Kampo medicine) and heart failure readmission: A Nationwide propensity score-matched study. Clinical Characteristics and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Escalation From Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump to Impella: From the J-PVAD Registry. The role of left atrium posterior wall isolation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Post-CABG Outcomes in Veterans: Insights from the REGROUP Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1