{"title":"下ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者近端右冠状动脉闭塞与非近端右冠状动脉闭塞的临床疗效比较。","authors":"Koudai Hamaguchi MD, Kenichi Sakakura MD, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi MD, Yousuke Taniguchi MD, Kei Yamamoto MD, Takunori Tsukui MD, Masashi Hatori MD, Taku Kasahara MD, Yusuke Watanabe MD, Shun Ishibashi MD, Masaru Seguchi MD, Hideo Fujita MD, FJCC","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to the occlusion of left coronary artery are worse in patients with proximal occlusion than in those with non-proximal occlusion. However, there are few reports that focus on the comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI between proximal and non-proximal right coronary artery (RCA) occlusions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included 356 patients with STEMI whose infarct-related artery is RCA and divided them into the proximal group (<em>n</em> = 129) and the non-proximal group (<em>n</em> = 227). We defined segment 1 of RCA as proximal, and segments 2, 3, and 4 as non-proximal according to the reporting system of the American Heart Association. The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE), which was defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, readmission for heart failure, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Incidence of shock at admission, requirement for catecholamine during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or mechanical support during PCI tended to be higher in the proximal group (42.6 %) than in the non-proximal group (33.5 %) (<em>p</em> = 0.088). Although the incidence of right ventricular infarction tended to be higher in the proximal group (17.8 %) than in the non-proximal group (10.6 %) without reaching statistical significance (<em>p</em> = 0.072), the incidence of in-hospital death was similar between the 2 groups (1.6 % versus 1.8 %, <em>p</em> = 1.000). The MACE-free survival curves were not different between the 2 groups (<em>p</em> = 0.400). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE (HR 1.095, 95%CI 0.691–1.737, <em>p</em> = 0.699).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although the acute phase conditions such as shock or right ventricular infarction tended to be more severe in patients with proximal occlusion, overall clinical outcomes including long-term outcomes were comparable between the proximal and distal RCA occlusions. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE after hospital discharge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":"85 2","pages":"Pages 88-95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of clinical outcomes between proximal and non-proximal right coronary artery occlusion in patients with inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction\",\"authors\":\"Koudai Hamaguchi MD, Kenichi Sakakura MD, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi MD, Yousuke Taniguchi MD, Kei Yamamoto MD, Takunori Tsukui MD, Masashi Hatori MD, Taku Kasahara MD, Yusuke Watanabe MD, Shun Ishibashi MD, Masaru Seguchi MD, Hideo Fujita MD, FJCC\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.07.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to the occlusion of left coronary artery are worse in patients with proximal occlusion than in those with non-proximal occlusion. However, there are few reports that focus on the comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI between proximal and non-proximal right coronary artery (RCA) occlusions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included 356 patients with STEMI whose infarct-related artery is RCA and divided them into the proximal group (<em>n</em> = 129) and the non-proximal group (<em>n</em> = 227). We defined segment 1 of RCA as proximal, and segments 2, 3, and 4 as non-proximal according to the reporting system of the American Heart Association. The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE), which was defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, readmission for heart failure, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Incidence of shock at admission, requirement for catecholamine during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or mechanical support during PCI tended to be higher in the proximal group (42.6 %) than in the non-proximal group (33.5 %) (<em>p</em> = 0.088). Although the incidence of right ventricular infarction tended to be higher in the proximal group (17.8 %) than in the non-proximal group (10.6 %) without reaching statistical significance (<em>p</em> = 0.072), the incidence of in-hospital death was similar between the 2 groups (1.6 % versus 1.8 %, <em>p</em> = 1.000). The MACE-free survival curves were not different between the 2 groups (<em>p</em> = 0.400). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE (HR 1.095, 95%CI 0.691–1.737, <em>p</em> = 0.699).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although the acute phase conditions such as shock or right ventricular infarction tended to be more severe in patients with proximal occlusion, overall clinical outcomes including long-term outcomes were comparable between the proximal and distal RCA occlusions. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE after hospital discharge.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\"85 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 88-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0914508724001448\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0914508724001448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of clinical outcomes between proximal and non-proximal right coronary artery occlusion in patients with inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Background
The clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to the occlusion of left coronary artery are worse in patients with proximal occlusion than in those with non-proximal occlusion. However, there are few reports that focus on the comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI between proximal and non-proximal right coronary artery (RCA) occlusions.
Methods
We included 356 patients with STEMI whose infarct-related artery is RCA and divided them into the proximal group (n = 129) and the non-proximal group (n = 227). We defined segment 1 of RCA as proximal, and segments 2, 3, and 4 as non-proximal according to the reporting system of the American Heart Association. The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE), which was defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, readmission for heart failure, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.
Results
Incidence of shock at admission, requirement for catecholamine during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or mechanical support during PCI tended to be higher in the proximal group (42.6 %) than in the non-proximal group (33.5 %) (p = 0.088). Although the incidence of right ventricular infarction tended to be higher in the proximal group (17.8 %) than in the non-proximal group (10.6 %) without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.072), the incidence of in-hospital death was similar between the 2 groups (1.6 % versus 1.8 %, p = 1.000). The MACE-free survival curves were not different between the 2 groups (p = 0.400). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE (HR 1.095, 95%CI 0.691–1.737, p = 0.699).
Conclusions
Although the acute phase conditions such as shock or right ventricular infarction tended to be more severe in patients with proximal occlusion, overall clinical outcomes including long-term outcomes were comparable between the proximal and distal RCA occlusions. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE after hospital discharge.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.