心理干预对被监禁法医人群创伤后应激障碍症状的疗效:随机对照试验荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1037/tra0001771
Anjo van der Ploeg, Sophie A Rameckers, Arnold A P van Emmerik
{"title":"心理干预对被监禁法医人群创伤后应激障碍症状的疗效:随机对照试验荟萃分析。","authors":"Anjo van der Ploeg, Sophie A Rameckers, Arnold A P van Emmerik","doi":"10.1037/tra0001771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Given the high prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in incarcerated forensic populations, this meta-analysis estimated the efficacy of interventions in this field and explored predictors of intervention outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twelve randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions for PTSD symptoms in incarcerated forensic populations were included. A combined Hedges's g effect size was synthesized, quality assessments and risk of bias analyses were performed, and publication bias was assessed. Gender and type of control group were explored as predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen comparisons from 12 studies were included in the main analysis. A small to medium combined effect size (<i>g</i> = 0.43, <i>p</i> = .005) was found at posttreatment. The type of control group (<i>p</i> = .156) and gender (<i>p</i> = .953) did not predict outcomes. When we analyzed the available follow-up data (<i>k</i> = 5), the effect was nonsignificant (<i>g</i> = 0.36, <i>p</i> = .123). Study quality was poor and risk of bias high, and studies of first-line PTSD treatments were not found in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A few studies suggest that PTSD treatment may improve symptoms in incarcerated forensic populations, at least temporarily. Follow-up data are still too scarce to draw conclusions about long-term outcomes. Findings of this study indicate that methodologically rigorous outcome research in these populations is needed, with a specific focus on first-line PTSD treatments, long-term efficacy, measurement of recidivism, as well as addressing comorbid conditions given the common complex clinical and social needs in this population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of psychological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in incarcerated forensic populations: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Anjo van der Ploeg, Sophie A Rameckers, Arnold A P van Emmerik\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tra0001771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Given the high prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in incarcerated forensic populations, this meta-analysis estimated the efficacy of interventions in this field and explored predictors of intervention outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twelve randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions for PTSD symptoms in incarcerated forensic populations were included. A combined Hedges's g effect size was synthesized, quality assessments and risk of bias analyses were performed, and publication bias was assessed. Gender and type of control group were explored as predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen comparisons from 12 studies were included in the main analysis. A small to medium combined effect size (<i>g</i> = 0.43, <i>p</i> = .005) was found at posttreatment. The type of control group (<i>p</i> = .156) and gender (<i>p</i> = .953) did not predict outcomes. When we analyzed the available follow-up data (<i>k</i> = 5), the effect was nonsignificant (<i>g</i> = 0.36, <i>p</i> = .123). Study quality was poor and risk of bias high, and studies of first-line PTSD treatments were not found in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A few studies suggest that PTSD treatment may improve symptoms in incarcerated forensic populations, at least temporarily. Follow-up data are still too scarce to draw conclusions about long-term outcomes. Findings of this study indicate that methodologically rigorous outcome research in these populations is needed, with a specific focus on first-line PTSD treatments, long-term efficacy, measurement of recidivism, as well as addressing comorbid conditions given the common complex clinical and social needs in this population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001771\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:鉴于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状在被监禁的法医人群中的高发率,本荟萃分析估计了该领域干预措施的有效性,并探讨了干预结果的预测因素:方法:纳入了 12 项针对被监禁法医人群创伤后应激障碍症状的心理干预随机对照试验。综合了赫奇斯g效应大小,进行了质量评估和偏倚风险分析,并评估了发表偏倚。对性别和对照组类型进行了预测:主要分析包括 12 项研究中的 13 项比较。在治疗后发现了小到中等的综合效应大小(g = 0.43,p = .005)。对照组的类型(p = .156)和性别(p = .953)并不能预测结果。当我们分析现有的随访数据(k = 5)时,效果并不显著(g = 0.36,p = .123)。研究质量较差,偏倚风险较高,文献中未发现关于创伤后应激障碍一线治疗的研究:结论:一些研究表明,创伤后应激障碍治疗可以改善被监禁的法医人群的症状,至少是暂时的。后续数据仍然太少,无法得出长期结果的结论。本研究的结果表明,需要对这些人群进行方法上严格的结果研究,重点关注创伤后应激障碍的一线治疗、长期疗效、再犯率的测量,以及考虑到这些人群常见的复杂临床和社会需求而解决合并症问题。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of psychological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in incarcerated forensic populations: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Objective: Given the high prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in incarcerated forensic populations, this meta-analysis estimated the efficacy of interventions in this field and explored predictors of intervention outcomes.

Method: Twelve randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions for PTSD symptoms in incarcerated forensic populations were included. A combined Hedges's g effect size was synthesized, quality assessments and risk of bias analyses were performed, and publication bias was assessed. Gender and type of control group were explored as predictors.

Results: Thirteen comparisons from 12 studies were included in the main analysis. A small to medium combined effect size (g = 0.43, p = .005) was found at posttreatment. The type of control group (p = .156) and gender (p = .953) did not predict outcomes. When we analyzed the available follow-up data (k = 5), the effect was nonsignificant (g = 0.36, p = .123). Study quality was poor and risk of bias high, and studies of first-line PTSD treatments were not found in the literature.

Conclusions: A few studies suggest that PTSD treatment may improve symptoms in incarcerated forensic populations, at least temporarily. Follow-up data are still too scarce to draw conclusions about long-term outcomes. Findings of this study indicate that methodologically rigorous outcome research in these populations is needed, with a specific focus on first-line PTSD treatments, long-term efficacy, measurement of recidivism, as well as addressing comorbid conditions given the common complex clinical and social needs in this population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
期刊最新文献
Resilience in the aftermath of trauma: Classes of adjustment in at-risk youth. The latent transition of posttraumatic stress disorder and growth among adolescents surviving Jiuzhaigou earthquake. How trauma is represented on social media: Analysis of #trauma content on TikTok. Emotion dysregulation and posttraumatic stress symptom severity: The influence of cortisol reactivity following idiographic emotion inductions. The role of maternal postmigration living difficulties in intergenerational trauma transmission among asylum-seeker mother-child dyads: Exploring complex posttraumatic stress disorder as a mechanism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1