Ligia Cordovani, Susan M Jack, Anne Wong, Sandra Monteiro
{"title":"调查医学院本科生在医学院第一年和最后一年的学习动机取向和学习策略。","authors":"Ligia Cordovani, Susan M Jack, Anne Wong, Sandra Monteiro","doi":"10.1007/s40670-024-02067-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motivation to learn has been linked to learning outcomes, academic performance, learner well-being, and choice of medical specialty. Previous studies showed successful educational interventions to optimize students' levels of motivation and learning strategies. The purposes of this study are (1) to describe undergraduate medical students' motivational orientations and learning strategies in the first and last year at a Canadian university and (2) to analyze possible differences between undergraduate medical students' motivational orientations and learning strategies in those two academic years. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). The survey was sent to a total of 207 first-year and 203 third-year students. We received a total of 58 surveys, 32 of them were complete and analyzed. The overall response rate was 14.1%. The internal consistency for all the scales varied from 0.61 to 0.904. The overall score for the survey was 4.97 on a 7-point scale for all students. Highest scales' scores were obtained for elaboration (mean 5.68) and learning beliefs (mean 5.64), with the lowest scores obtained for rehearsal (3.82) and test anxiety (3.94). The total scores did not differ by students' academic year (<i>p</i> = 0.764), except for the effort regulation scale in which first-year students scored higher (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The largest differences between first- and last-year students were found in effort regulation, where first-years scored higher (difference of 0.99), followed by peer learning (difference of - 0.51), and then test anxiety (- 0.36). Our results showed a sample of students that are highly motivated, mostly driven by intrinsic goals, and are confident that they will master the tasks given to them. They rely more on elaboration strategies building connections between new and prior information, and less in rehearsal strategies used for simple tasks and memorization. The MSLQ showed to be a reliable instrument in our sample, and it could be use as an instrument to identify students' adaptive changes to enhance students' motivation to learn. A portrayal of medical students' attitudes in learning could guide educators to develop instructional programs that would help students to optimize their own learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"34 4","pages":"783-793"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surveying Undergraduate Medical Students' Motivational Orientations and Learning Strategies in the First and Last Year of Medical School.\",\"authors\":\"Ligia Cordovani, Susan M Jack, Anne Wong, Sandra Monteiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40670-024-02067-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Motivation to learn has been linked to learning outcomes, academic performance, learner well-being, and choice of medical specialty. Previous studies showed successful educational interventions to optimize students' levels of motivation and learning strategies. The purposes of this study are (1) to describe undergraduate medical students' motivational orientations and learning strategies in the first and last year at a Canadian university and (2) to analyze possible differences between undergraduate medical students' motivational orientations and learning strategies in those two academic years. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). The survey was sent to a total of 207 first-year and 203 third-year students. We received a total of 58 surveys, 32 of them were complete and analyzed. The overall response rate was 14.1%. The internal consistency for all the scales varied from 0.61 to 0.904. The overall score for the survey was 4.97 on a 7-point scale for all students. Highest scales' scores were obtained for elaboration (mean 5.68) and learning beliefs (mean 5.64), with the lowest scores obtained for rehearsal (3.82) and test anxiety (3.94). The total scores did not differ by students' academic year (<i>p</i> = 0.764), except for the effort regulation scale in which first-year students scored higher (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The largest differences between first- and last-year students were found in effort regulation, where first-years scored higher (difference of 0.99), followed by peer learning (difference of - 0.51), and then test anxiety (- 0.36). Our results showed a sample of students that are highly motivated, mostly driven by intrinsic goals, and are confident that they will master the tasks given to them. They rely more on elaboration strategies building connections between new and prior information, and less in rehearsal strategies used for simple tasks and memorization. The MSLQ showed to be a reliable instrument in our sample, and it could be use as an instrument to identify students' adaptive changes to enhance students' motivation to learn. A portrayal of medical students' attitudes in learning could guide educators to develop instructional programs that would help students to optimize their own learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Educator\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"783-793\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297228/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02067-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02067-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surveying Undergraduate Medical Students' Motivational Orientations and Learning Strategies in the First and Last Year of Medical School.
Motivation to learn has been linked to learning outcomes, academic performance, learner well-being, and choice of medical specialty. Previous studies showed successful educational interventions to optimize students' levels of motivation and learning strategies. The purposes of this study are (1) to describe undergraduate medical students' motivational orientations and learning strategies in the first and last year at a Canadian university and (2) to analyze possible differences between undergraduate medical students' motivational orientations and learning strategies in those two academic years. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). The survey was sent to a total of 207 first-year and 203 third-year students. We received a total of 58 surveys, 32 of them were complete and analyzed. The overall response rate was 14.1%. The internal consistency for all the scales varied from 0.61 to 0.904. The overall score for the survey was 4.97 on a 7-point scale for all students. Highest scales' scores were obtained for elaboration (mean 5.68) and learning beliefs (mean 5.64), with the lowest scores obtained for rehearsal (3.82) and test anxiety (3.94). The total scores did not differ by students' academic year (p = 0.764), except for the effort regulation scale in which first-year students scored higher (p = 0.01). The largest differences between first- and last-year students were found in effort regulation, where first-years scored higher (difference of 0.99), followed by peer learning (difference of - 0.51), and then test anxiety (- 0.36). Our results showed a sample of students that are highly motivated, mostly driven by intrinsic goals, and are confident that they will master the tasks given to them. They rely more on elaboration strategies building connections between new and prior information, and less in rehearsal strategies used for simple tasks and memorization. The MSLQ showed to be a reliable instrument in our sample, and it could be use as an instrument to identify students' adaptive changes to enhance students' motivation to learn. A portrayal of medical students' attitudes in learning could guide educators to develop instructional programs that would help students to optimize their own learning.
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.