芝加哥儿科初级保健中数字心理健康整合的实施前决定因素。

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Pediatric Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsae058
Colleen Stiles-Shields, Erika L Gustafson, Paulina S Lim, Gabriella Bobadilla, Dillon Thorpe, Faith C Summersett Williams, Geri R Donenberg, Wrenetha A Julion, Niranjan S Karnik
{"title":"芝加哥儿科初级保健中数字心理健康整合的实施前决定因素。","authors":"Colleen Stiles-Shields, Erika L Gustafson, Paulina S Lim, Gabriella Bobadilla, Dillon Thorpe, Faith C Summersett Williams, Geri R Donenberg, Wrenetha A Julion, Niranjan S Karnik","doi":"10.1093/jpepsy/jsae058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pediatric primary care (PPC) is a common treatment site for pediatric mental health, but it is currently unable to meet the needs of all teen patients, particularly those with minoritized identities and/or marginalized experiences. Digital mental health (DMH) low-intensity treatments (LITs) can increase mental health screening and care capacity in PPC, but how this is done successfully without burdening providers, patients, or families is unclear. This paper presents a pre-implementation study aimed at understanding the implementation context (PPCs in Chicago, IL) for a specific DMH LIT.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a mixed-methods design, quantitative data from an online survey of providers assessed current DMH practices in PPC, and qualitative interviews with Pediatricians and Pediatric Psychologists examined implementation determinants for a specific DMH LIT. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey reports (n = 105) and interviews (n = 6) indicated low current use of DMH. Providers in PPC clinics voiced multiple reasons for low usage and low perceived feasibility, including: Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Inner Setting Domain (PPC clinic workflow, responsibility and ethical considerations, patient privacy and confidentiality), CFIR Outer Setting Domain (hospital and healthcare system factors), CFIR Innovation Domain (DMH design), and a cross-cutting theme of safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Provider-reported low feasibility for integrating DMH in PPC is a call to action to partner with interdisciplinary colleagues and identify how such settings can ethically and seamlessly deliver digital evidence-based and accessible screening and care prior to implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-implementation determinants for digital mental health integration in Chicago pediatric primary care.\",\"authors\":\"Colleen Stiles-Shields, Erika L Gustafson, Paulina S Lim, Gabriella Bobadilla, Dillon Thorpe, Faith C Summersett Williams, Geri R Donenberg, Wrenetha A Julion, Niranjan S Karnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jpepsy/jsae058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pediatric primary care (PPC) is a common treatment site for pediatric mental health, but it is currently unable to meet the needs of all teen patients, particularly those with minoritized identities and/or marginalized experiences. Digital mental health (DMH) low-intensity treatments (LITs) can increase mental health screening and care capacity in PPC, but how this is done successfully without burdening providers, patients, or families is unclear. This paper presents a pre-implementation study aimed at understanding the implementation context (PPCs in Chicago, IL) for a specific DMH LIT.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a mixed-methods design, quantitative data from an online survey of providers assessed current DMH practices in PPC, and qualitative interviews with Pediatricians and Pediatric Psychologists examined implementation determinants for a specific DMH LIT. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey reports (n = 105) and interviews (n = 6) indicated low current use of DMH. Providers in PPC clinics voiced multiple reasons for low usage and low perceived feasibility, including: Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Inner Setting Domain (PPC clinic workflow, responsibility and ethical considerations, patient privacy and confidentiality), CFIR Outer Setting Domain (hospital and healthcare system factors), CFIR Innovation Domain (DMH design), and a cross-cutting theme of safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Provider-reported low feasibility for integrating DMH in PPC is a call to action to partner with interdisciplinary colleagues and identify how such settings can ethically and seamlessly deliver digital evidence-based and accessible screening and care prior to implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsae058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsae058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:儿科初级保健(PPC)是儿科心理健康的常见治疗场所,但目前还无法满足所有青少年患者的需求,尤其是那些具有少数民族身份和/或边缘化经历的患者。数字心理健康(DMH)低强度治疗(LITs)可以提高儿科门诊的心理健康筛查和护理能力,但如何在不增加医疗服务提供者、患者或家庭负担的情况下成功实现这一目标尚不清楚。本文介绍了一项实施前研究,旨在了解特定 DMH LIT 的实施环境(伊利诺伊州芝加哥市的 PPC):方法:采用混合方法设计,通过对医疗服务提供者的在线调查获取定量数据,评估当前 DMH 在 PPC 方面的实践;对儿科医生和儿科心理学家进行定性访谈,研究特定 DMH LIT 的实施决定因素。定量数据采用描述性统计进行分析,访谈采用快速定性评估进行分析:调查报告(n = 105)和访谈(n = 6)显示,目前 DMH 的使用率较低。PPC 诊所的医疗服务提供者提出了使用率低和认为可行性低的多种原因,包括实施研究综合框架(CFIR)内部环境领域(PPC 诊所工作流程、责任和道德考虑、患者隐私和保密性)、CFIR 外部环境领域(医院和医疗保健系统因素)、CFIR 创新领域(DMH 设计)以及安全这一交叉主题:医疗服务提供者报告称,将 DMH 整合到 PPC 中的可行性较低,这就要求我们与跨学科同事合作,在实施前确定此类环境如何能够合乎道德并无缝地提供基于循证医学证据的数字化无障碍筛查和护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pre-implementation determinants for digital mental health integration in Chicago pediatric primary care.

Objective: Pediatric primary care (PPC) is a common treatment site for pediatric mental health, but it is currently unable to meet the needs of all teen patients, particularly those with minoritized identities and/or marginalized experiences. Digital mental health (DMH) low-intensity treatments (LITs) can increase mental health screening and care capacity in PPC, but how this is done successfully without burdening providers, patients, or families is unclear. This paper presents a pre-implementation study aimed at understanding the implementation context (PPCs in Chicago, IL) for a specific DMH LIT.

Method: Using a mixed-methods design, quantitative data from an online survey of providers assessed current DMH practices in PPC, and qualitative interviews with Pediatricians and Pediatric Psychologists examined implementation determinants for a specific DMH LIT. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative assessment.

Results: Survey reports (n = 105) and interviews (n = 6) indicated low current use of DMH. Providers in PPC clinics voiced multiple reasons for low usage and low perceived feasibility, including: Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Inner Setting Domain (PPC clinic workflow, responsibility and ethical considerations, patient privacy and confidentiality), CFIR Outer Setting Domain (hospital and healthcare system factors), CFIR Innovation Domain (DMH design), and a cross-cutting theme of safety.

Conclusions: Provider-reported low feasibility for integrating DMH in PPC is a call to action to partner with interdisciplinary colleagues and identify how such settings can ethically and seamlessly deliver digital evidence-based and accessible screening and care prior to implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Journal of Pediatric Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Psychology is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Psychology, Division 54 of the American Psychological Association. The Journal of Pediatric Psychology publishes articles related to theory, research, and professional practice in pediatric psychology. Pediatric psychology is an integrated field of science and practice in which the principles of psychology are applied within the context of pediatric health. The field aims to promote the health and development of children, adolescents, and their families through use of evidence-based methods.
期刊最新文献
"Being alone for a whole year [is hard]" Families reflect on the emotional toll of stem cell transplantation for sickle cell disease. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of psychological interventions on anxiety in children and youth with chronic medical conditions. Caregivers' physiological responses during toddler vaccinations: associations with psychological and behavioral responses. Systematic review and meta-analysis of combined cognitive-behavioral therapy and physical activity and exercise interventions for pediatric chronic disease. Temporal summation of pain in sickle cell disease: comparison of adolescents and young adults with chronic vs. infrequent pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1