智力和/或发育障碍人士在医疗补助居家和社区服务豁免注册方面的不平等:基于索赔的全国性分析。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Disability and Health Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101676
A Alex Levine, Megan B Cole, Amy Lynn Michals, Na Wang, Eric Rubenstein
{"title":"智力和/或发育障碍人士在医疗补助居家和社区服务豁免注册方面的不平等:基于索赔的全国性分析。","authors":"A Alex Levine, Megan B Cole, Amy Lynn Michals, Na Wang, Eric Rubenstein","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>States use Medicaid 1915(c) waiver programs to enable access to home- and community-based services for people with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (I/DD). However, enrollment rates and potential inequities are not well documented, impeding efforts to improve care access and quality for waiver program enrollees, especially for racially minoritized beneficiaries experiencing compounded barriers to services and supports.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize year-by-year 1915(c) waiver program enrollment among Medicaid-enrolled adults with I/DD from 2016 to 2019 and to analyze population-level inequities by type of I/DD and racial/ethnic group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our data source was 2016-2019 Medicaid Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System Analytic Files Demographic and Eligibility files for beneficiaries with Down syndrome, autism, and intellectual disability. We used generalized estimating equation linear models to estimate the associations of type of I/DD and racial/ethnic group with the probability of 1915(c) waiver program enrollment and reported (1) unadjusted estimates and (2) estimates adjusted for demographics with state and year fixed effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2016 to 2019, across all types of I/DD and racial/ethnic groups, unadjusted 1915(c) waiver program enrollment rates ranged from 40 to 60 % nationwide. We found modest growth in 1915(c) I/DD waiver program enrollment but persistent inequities over time. Compared to beneficiaries with intellectual disabilities, beneficiaries with autism were less likely to enroll while beneficiaries with Down syndrome were more likely. While some racial/ethnic groups had higher unadjusted mean enrollment, after adjustment, racially minoritized beneficiaries were 3.66-12.0 percentage points less likely to enroll compared to white non-Hispanic beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given extensive waiting lists for 1915(c) waiver programs, Medicaid programs should evaluate existing enrollment and authorization processes and consider alternative HCBS program authorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequities in medicaid home- and community-based services waiver enrollment among people with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities: A nationwide claims-based analysis.\",\"authors\":\"A Alex Levine, Megan B Cole, Amy Lynn Michals, Na Wang, Eric Rubenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>States use Medicaid 1915(c) waiver programs to enable access to home- and community-based services for people with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (I/DD). However, enrollment rates and potential inequities are not well documented, impeding efforts to improve care access and quality for waiver program enrollees, especially for racially minoritized beneficiaries experiencing compounded barriers to services and supports.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize year-by-year 1915(c) waiver program enrollment among Medicaid-enrolled adults with I/DD from 2016 to 2019 and to analyze population-level inequities by type of I/DD and racial/ethnic group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our data source was 2016-2019 Medicaid Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System Analytic Files Demographic and Eligibility files for beneficiaries with Down syndrome, autism, and intellectual disability. We used generalized estimating equation linear models to estimate the associations of type of I/DD and racial/ethnic group with the probability of 1915(c) waiver program enrollment and reported (1) unadjusted estimates and (2) estimates adjusted for demographics with state and year fixed effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2016 to 2019, across all types of I/DD and racial/ethnic groups, unadjusted 1915(c) waiver program enrollment rates ranged from 40 to 60 % nationwide. We found modest growth in 1915(c) I/DD waiver program enrollment but persistent inequities over time. Compared to beneficiaries with intellectual disabilities, beneficiaries with autism were less likely to enroll while beneficiaries with Down syndrome were more likely. While some racial/ethnic groups had higher unadjusted mean enrollment, after adjustment, racially minoritized beneficiaries were 3.66-12.0 percentage points less likely to enroll compared to white non-Hispanic beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given extensive waiting lists for 1915(c) waiver programs, Medicaid programs should evaluate existing enrollment and authorization processes and consider alternative HCBS program authorities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101676\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101676","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:各州利用医疗补助 1915(c)减免计划为智力和/或发育障碍(I/DD)患者提供家庭和社区服务。然而,该计划的注册率和潜在的不公平现象并没有得到很好的记录,这阻碍了改善减免计划注册者,尤其是那些在服务和支持方面面临重重障碍的少数种族受益者获得护理的机会和质量的努力:目的:描述 2016 年至 2019 年 I/DD 成人医疗补助计划(Medicaid)1915(c) 减免计划的逐年注册情况,并按 I/DD 类型和种族/族裔群体分析人口层面的不平等现象:我们的数据来源是 2016-2019 年医疗补助转型医疗补助统计信息系统分析档案中唐氏综合症、自闭症和智障受益人的人口统计和资格档案。我们使用广义估计方程线性模型来估计 I/DD 类型和种族/族裔群体与 1915(c) 减免计划注册概率之间的关联,并报告了(1)未调整的估计值和(2)根据人口统计学因素和州及年份固定效应调整后的估计值:从 2016 年到 2019 年,在所有类型的 I/DD 和种族/族裔群体中,全国范围内未经调整的 1915(c)减免计划注册率介于 40% 到 60% 之间。我们发现,1915(c) I/DD 减免计划的注册率略有增长,但长期存在不公平现象。与智障受益人相比,患有自闭症的受益人的注册率较低,而患有唐氏综合症的受益人的注册率较高。虽然一些种族/族裔群体的未调整平均注册率较高,但经过调整后,与白人非西班牙裔受益人相比,少数种族受益人的注册率要低 3.66-12.0 个百分点:鉴于 1915(c)豁免计划的候选者众多,医疗补助计划应评估现有的注册和授权程序,并考虑替代性的 HCBS 计划授权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inequities in medicaid home- and community-based services waiver enrollment among people with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities: A nationwide claims-based analysis.

Background: States use Medicaid 1915(c) waiver programs to enable access to home- and community-based services for people with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (I/DD). However, enrollment rates and potential inequities are not well documented, impeding efforts to improve care access and quality for waiver program enrollees, especially for racially minoritized beneficiaries experiencing compounded barriers to services and supports.

Objective: To characterize year-by-year 1915(c) waiver program enrollment among Medicaid-enrolled adults with I/DD from 2016 to 2019 and to analyze population-level inequities by type of I/DD and racial/ethnic group.

Methods: Our data source was 2016-2019 Medicaid Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System Analytic Files Demographic and Eligibility files for beneficiaries with Down syndrome, autism, and intellectual disability. We used generalized estimating equation linear models to estimate the associations of type of I/DD and racial/ethnic group with the probability of 1915(c) waiver program enrollment and reported (1) unadjusted estimates and (2) estimates adjusted for demographics with state and year fixed effects.

Results: From 2016 to 2019, across all types of I/DD and racial/ethnic groups, unadjusted 1915(c) waiver program enrollment rates ranged from 40 to 60 % nationwide. We found modest growth in 1915(c) I/DD waiver program enrollment but persistent inequities over time. Compared to beneficiaries with intellectual disabilities, beneficiaries with autism were less likely to enroll while beneficiaries with Down syndrome were more likely. While some racial/ethnic groups had higher unadjusted mean enrollment, after adjustment, racially minoritized beneficiaries were 3.66-12.0 percentage points less likely to enroll compared to white non-Hispanic beneficiaries.

Conclusions: Given extensive waiting lists for 1915(c) waiver programs, Medicaid programs should evaluate existing enrollment and authorization processes and consider alternative HCBS program authorities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
期刊最新文献
Physical activity as a mediator in the relationship between health locus of control and health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients with different disease duration. Covid-19 Pandemic's impact on socio-emotional problems experienced by victims of violence with disabilities. Racial-ethnic differences in the associations between functional disabilities and subsequent depression among community-dwelling midlife and older adults in the US. Transportation for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Home- and Community-Based Services. School-based factors influencing physical activity participation in children and adolescents with disabilities: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1