经济激励措施对坦桑尼亚开始接受艾滋病治疗的成年人病毒抑制率的影响:有效性与实施性混合试验。

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Lancet Hiv Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00149-8
Prosper F Njau, Emmanuel Katabaro, Solis Winters, Amon Sabasaba, Kassim Hassan, Babuu Joseph, Hamza Maila, Janeth Msasa, Carolyn A Fahey, Laura Packel, William H Dow, Nicholas P Jewell, Nzovu Ulenga, Natalino Mwenda, Sandra I McCoy
{"title":"经济激励措施对坦桑尼亚开始接受艾滋病治疗的成年人病毒抑制率的影响:有效性与实施性混合试验。","authors":"Prosper F Njau, Emmanuel Katabaro, Solis Winters, Amon Sabasaba, Kassim Hassan, Babuu Joseph, Hamza Maila, Janeth Msasa, Carolyn A Fahey, Laura Packel, William H Dow, Nicholas P Jewell, Nzovu Ulenga, Natalino Mwenda, Sandra I McCoy","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00149-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small incentives could improve engagement in HIV care. We evaluated the short-term and longer-term effects of financial incentives for visit attendance on viral suppression among adults initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study, we randomised (1:1) 32 primary care HIV clinics in four Tanzanian regions to usual care (control group) or the intervention (usual care plus ≤6 monthly incentives [22 500 Tanzanian Shillings, about US$10, each], conditional on visit attendance). Adults (aged ≥18 years) initiating ART (<30 days) who owned a mobile phone and had no plans to transfer to another facility were eligible. The primary outcome was retention on ART with viral suppression (<1000 copies per mL) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included retention on ART with viral suppression at 6 months and viral suppression at 6 months and 12 months using a lower threshold (<50 copies per mL). Intent-to-treat analysis and a cluster-based permutation test were used to evaluate the effect of financial incentives on outcomes. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04201353, and is completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between May 28, 2021, and March 8, 2022, 1990 participants (805 male and 1185 female) were enrolled in the study. 1059 participants were assigned to the intervention group and 931 participants were assigned to the control group. Overall, 1536 (88%) participants at 6 months and 1575 (83%) at 12 months were on ART with viral suppression. At 12 months, 6 months after the intervention ended, 866 (85%) participants in the intervention group compared with 709 (81%) in the control group had viral loads less than 1000 copies per mL (adjusted risk difference [aRD] 4·4 percentage points, 95% CI -1·4 to 10·1, permutation test p=0·35). At 6 months, 858 participants (90%) in the intervention group were on ART with viral loads less than 1000 copies per mL compared with 678 (86%) in the control group (aRD 5·1 percentage points, 95% CI 1·1 to 9·1, permutation test p=0·06). Effects were larger at 6 months and 12 months with the lower threshold for viral suppression, and there was significant effect heterogeneity by region. Adverse events included 106 deaths (56 in the control group and 50 in the intervention group), none related to study participation.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Short-term incentives for visit attendance had modest, short term benefits on viral suppression and did not harm retention or viral suppression after discontinuation. These findings suggest the need to understand subgroups who would most benefit from incentives to support HIV care.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute of Mental Health.</p><p><strong>Translation: </strong>For the Swahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p>","PeriodicalId":48725,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Hiv","volume":" ","pages":"e586-e597"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of financial incentives on viral suppression among adults initiating HIV treatment in Tanzania: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.\",\"authors\":\"Prosper F Njau, Emmanuel Katabaro, Solis Winters, Amon Sabasaba, Kassim Hassan, Babuu Joseph, Hamza Maila, Janeth Msasa, Carolyn A Fahey, Laura Packel, William H Dow, Nicholas P Jewell, Nzovu Ulenga, Natalino Mwenda, Sandra I McCoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00149-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small incentives could improve engagement in HIV care. We evaluated the short-term and longer-term effects of financial incentives for visit attendance on viral suppression among adults initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study, we randomised (1:1) 32 primary care HIV clinics in four Tanzanian regions to usual care (control group) or the intervention (usual care plus ≤6 monthly incentives [22 500 Tanzanian Shillings, about US$10, each], conditional on visit attendance). Adults (aged ≥18 years) initiating ART (<30 days) who owned a mobile phone and had no plans to transfer to another facility were eligible. The primary outcome was retention on ART with viral suppression (<1000 copies per mL) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included retention on ART with viral suppression at 6 months and viral suppression at 6 months and 12 months using a lower threshold (<50 copies per mL). Intent-to-treat analysis and a cluster-based permutation test were used to evaluate the effect of financial incentives on outcomes. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04201353, and is completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between May 28, 2021, and March 8, 2022, 1990 participants (805 male and 1185 female) were enrolled in the study. 1059 participants were assigned to the intervention group and 931 participants were assigned to the control group. Overall, 1536 (88%) participants at 6 months and 1575 (83%) at 12 months were on ART with viral suppression. At 12 months, 6 months after the intervention ended, 866 (85%) participants in the intervention group compared with 709 (81%) in the control group had viral loads less than 1000 copies per mL (adjusted risk difference [aRD] 4·4 percentage points, 95% CI -1·4 to 10·1, permutation test p=0·35). At 6 months, 858 participants (90%) in the intervention group were on ART with viral loads less than 1000 copies per mL compared with 678 (86%) in the control group (aRD 5·1 percentage points, 95% CI 1·1 to 9·1, permutation test p=0·06). Effects were larger at 6 months and 12 months with the lower threshold for viral suppression, and there was significant effect heterogeneity by region. Adverse events included 106 deaths (56 in the control group and 50 in the intervention group), none related to study participation.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Short-term incentives for visit attendance had modest, short term benefits on viral suppression and did not harm retention or viral suppression after discontinuation. These findings suggest the need to understand subgroups who would most benefit from incentives to support HIV care.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute of Mental Health.</p><p><strong>Translation: </strong>For the Swahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Hiv\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e586-e597\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457171/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Hiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00149-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00149-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:微小的激励措施可以提高人们参与艾滋病治疗的积极性。我们评估了经济激励措施对坦桑尼亚开始接受抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的成人病毒抑制率的短期和长期影响:在一项 1 型效果-实施混合研究中,我们将坦桑尼亚 4 个地区的 32 家艾滋病初级保健诊所随机(1:1)分为常规护理组(对照组)或干预组(常规护理加≤6 次每月奖励[22 500 坦桑尼亚先令,每次约 10 美元],以就诊率为条件)。开始接受抗逆转录病毒疗法的成年人(年龄≥18 岁)(研究结果:2021 年 5 月 28 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日):2021 年 5 月 28 日至 2022 年 3 月 8 日期间,1990 名参与者(男性 805 人,女性 1185 人)参加了研究。其中 1059 人被分配到干预组,931 人被分配到对照组。总体而言,1536 名参与者(88%)在 6 个月时接受了抗逆转录病毒疗法,1575 名参与者(83%)在 12 个月时接受了抗逆转录病毒疗法,病毒得到抑制。干预结束 6 个月后,即 12 个月时,干预组有 866 名参与者(85%)的病毒载量低于 1000 拷贝/毫升,对照组有 709 名参与者(81%)的病毒载量低于 1000 拷贝/毫升(调整后风险差异 [aRD] 4-4 个百分点,95% CI -1-4 至 10-1, permutation 检验 p=0-35)。6 个月时,干预组有 858 名参与者(90%)接受了抗逆转录病毒疗法,病毒载量低于 1000 copies per mL,而对照组有 678 名参与者(86%)接受了抗逆转录病毒疗法(调整风险差异为 5-1 个百分点,95% CI 为 1-1 至 9-1, permutation 检验 p=0-06)。病毒抑制阈值越低,6 个月和 12 个月的疗效越大,而且不同地区的疗效存在显著的异质性。不良事件包括 106 例死亡(对照组 56 例,干预组 50 例),其中没有一例与参与研究有关:对就诊者进行短期激励对病毒抑制有一定的短期益处,但并不影响停药后的保留率或病毒抑制率。这些研究结果表明,有必要了解哪些亚群最受益于支持艾滋病护理的激励措施:国家心理健康研究所:摘要的斯瓦希里语译文见补充材料部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of financial incentives on viral suppression among adults initiating HIV treatment in Tanzania: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

Background: Small incentives could improve engagement in HIV care. We evaluated the short-term and longer-term effects of financial incentives for visit attendance on viral suppression among adults initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Tanzania.

Methods: In a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study, we randomised (1:1) 32 primary care HIV clinics in four Tanzanian regions to usual care (control group) or the intervention (usual care plus ≤6 monthly incentives [22 500 Tanzanian Shillings, about US$10, each], conditional on visit attendance). Adults (aged ≥18 years) initiating ART (<30 days) who owned a mobile phone and had no plans to transfer to another facility were eligible. The primary outcome was retention on ART with viral suppression (<1000 copies per mL) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included retention on ART with viral suppression at 6 months and viral suppression at 6 months and 12 months using a lower threshold (<50 copies per mL). Intent-to-treat analysis and a cluster-based permutation test were used to evaluate the effect of financial incentives on outcomes. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04201353, and is completed.

Findings: Between May 28, 2021, and March 8, 2022, 1990 participants (805 male and 1185 female) were enrolled in the study. 1059 participants were assigned to the intervention group and 931 participants were assigned to the control group. Overall, 1536 (88%) participants at 6 months and 1575 (83%) at 12 months were on ART with viral suppression. At 12 months, 6 months after the intervention ended, 866 (85%) participants in the intervention group compared with 709 (81%) in the control group had viral loads less than 1000 copies per mL (adjusted risk difference [aRD] 4·4 percentage points, 95% CI -1·4 to 10·1, permutation test p=0·35). At 6 months, 858 participants (90%) in the intervention group were on ART with viral loads less than 1000 copies per mL compared with 678 (86%) in the control group (aRD 5·1 percentage points, 95% CI 1·1 to 9·1, permutation test p=0·06). Effects were larger at 6 months and 12 months with the lower threshold for viral suppression, and there was significant effect heterogeneity by region. Adverse events included 106 deaths (56 in the control group and 50 in the intervention group), none related to study participation.

Interpretation: Short-term incentives for visit attendance had modest, short term benefits on viral suppression and did not harm retention or viral suppression after discontinuation. These findings suggest the need to understand subgroups who would most benefit from incentives to support HIV care.

Funding: National Institute of Mental Health.

Translation: For the Swahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Hiv
Lancet Hiv IMMUNOLOGYINFECTIOUS DISEASES&-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
368
期刊介绍: The Lancet HIV is an internationally trusted source of clinical, public health, and global health knowledge with an Impact Factor of 16.1. It is dedicated to publishing original research, evidence-based reviews, and insightful features that advocate for change in or illuminates HIV clinical practice. The journal aims to provide a holistic view of the pandemic, covering clinical, epidemiological, and operational disciplines. It publishes content on innovative treatments and the biological research behind them, novel methods of service delivery, and new approaches to confronting HIV/AIDS worldwide. The Lancet HIV publishes various types of content including articles, reviews, comments, correspondences, and viewpoints. It also publishes series that aim to shape and drive positive change in clinical practice and health policy in areas of need in HIV. The journal is indexed by several abstracting and indexing services, including Crossref, Embase, Essential Science Indicators, MEDLINE, PubMed, SCIE and Scopus.
期刊最新文献
Correction to Lancet HIV 2024; 11: e783-90. HIV-related outcomes among migrants living in Europe compared with the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes and gaps in HIV care for migrants in Europe. Correction to Lancet HIV 2024; 11: e736-45. Highlights of the 5th HIVR4P Conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1