Emmanuel Bäckryd, Nazdar Ghafouri, Björn Gerdle, Elena Dragioti
{"title":"神经性疼痛的康复干预:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Emmanuel Bäckryd, Nazdar Ghafouri, Björn Gerdle, Elena Dragioti","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v56.40188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rehabilitation interventions for chronic pain typically include education, cognitive behavioural therapy, and exercise therapy, or a combination of these. A systematic review and meta-analysis of rehabilitation interventions for neuropathic pain was conducted.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trials were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO databases from inception up to 3 March 2022.</p><p><strong>Subjects/patients: </strong>Adults with chronic (> 3 months) neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary outcomes were pain intensity, pain-related disability, and work participation. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, emotional strain, insomnia, and adverse outcomes, according to VAPAIN guidelines. Analyses were made post-intervention, which was defined as the assessment point immediately following the intervention or at the first-time measurement conducted after the intervention period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 15 studies (total population, n = 764) were incorporated. Most common interventions were cognitive behavioural programmes including acceptance and commitment therapy (n = 4), mindfulness-based interventions (n = 5), and yoga (n = 2). Psychological interventions reduced both pain intensity (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.10) and pain-related disability (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.03), whereas other interventions had an effect on pain intensity but not on pain-related disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rehabilitation interventions, and psychological interventions in particular, seem to be of value for patients with chronic neuropathic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rehabilitation interventions for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Bäckryd, Nazdar Ghafouri, Björn Gerdle, Elena Dragioti\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/jrm.v56.40188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rehabilitation interventions for chronic pain typically include education, cognitive behavioural therapy, and exercise therapy, or a combination of these. A systematic review and meta-analysis of rehabilitation interventions for neuropathic pain was conducted.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trials were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO databases from inception up to 3 March 2022.</p><p><strong>Subjects/patients: </strong>Adults with chronic (> 3 months) neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary outcomes were pain intensity, pain-related disability, and work participation. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, emotional strain, insomnia, and adverse outcomes, according to VAPAIN guidelines. Analyses were made post-intervention, which was defined as the assessment point immediately following the intervention or at the first-time measurement conducted after the intervention period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 15 studies (total population, n = 764) were incorporated. Most common interventions were cognitive behavioural programmes including acceptance and commitment therapy (n = 4), mindfulness-based interventions (n = 5), and yoga (n = 2). Psychological interventions reduced both pain intensity (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.10) and pain-related disability (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.03), whereas other interventions had an effect on pain intensity but not on pain-related disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rehabilitation interventions, and psychological interventions in particular, seem to be of value for patients with chronic neuropathic pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318642/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.40188\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.40188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:针对慢性疼痛的康复干预措施通常包括教育、认知行为疗法和运动疗法,或这些疗法的组合。我们对神经性疼痛的康复干预措施进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析:随机对照试验在 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 PsycINFO 数据库中进行了检索,检索时间从开始至 2022 年 3 月 3 日:研究对象/患者:患有慢性(3 个月以上)神经性疼痛的成人:主要结果为疼痛强度、疼痛相关残疾和工作参与度。根据VAPAIN指南,次要结果为生活质量、情绪压力、失眠和不良后果。分析是在干预后进行的,即在干预后立即进行评估或在干预期后进行首次测量:共纳入 15 项研究(总人数为 764 人)。最常见的干预措施是认知行为疗法,包括接受和承诺疗法(4 项)、正念干预(5 项)和瑜伽(2 项)。心理干预可降低疼痛强度(SMD -0.49,95% CI -0.88至-0.10)和疼痛相关残疾(SMD -0.51,95% CI -0.98至-0.03),而其他干预对疼痛强度有影响,但对疼痛相关残疾没有影响:结论:康复干预措施,尤其是心理干预措施,似乎对慢性神经性疼痛患者很有价值。
Rehabilitation interventions for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Objective: Rehabilitation interventions for chronic pain typically include education, cognitive behavioural therapy, and exercise therapy, or a combination of these. A systematic review and meta-analysis of rehabilitation interventions for neuropathic pain was conducted.
Design: Randomized controlled trials were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO databases from inception up to 3 March 2022.
Subjects/patients: Adults with chronic (> 3 months) neuropathic pain.
Methods: Primary outcomes were pain intensity, pain-related disability, and work participation. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, emotional strain, insomnia, and adverse outcomes, according to VAPAIN guidelines. Analyses were made post-intervention, which was defined as the assessment point immediately following the intervention or at the first-time measurement conducted after the intervention period.
Results: In total, 15 studies (total population, n = 764) were incorporated. Most common interventions were cognitive behavioural programmes including acceptance and commitment therapy (n = 4), mindfulness-based interventions (n = 5), and yoga (n = 2). Psychological interventions reduced both pain intensity (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.10) and pain-related disability (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.03), whereas other interventions had an effect on pain intensity but not on pain-related disability.
Conclusion: Rehabilitation interventions, and psychological interventions in particular, seem to be of value for patients with chronic neuropathic pain.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year.
Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.