神经性疼痛的康复干预:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.2340/jrm.v56.40188
Emmanuel Bäckryd, Nazdar Ghafouri, Björn Gerdle, Elena Dragioti
{"title":"神经性疼痛的康复干预:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Emmanuel Bäckryd, Nazdar Ghafouri, Björn Gerdle, Elena Dragioti","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v56.40188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rehabilitation interventions for chronic pain typically include education, cognitive behavioural therapy, and exercise therapy, or a combination of these. A systematic review and meta-analysis of rehabilitation interventions for neuropathic pain was conducted.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trials were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO databases from inception up to 3 March 2022.</p><p><strong>Subjects/patients: </strong>Adults with chronic (> 3 months) neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary outcomes were pain intensity, pain-related disability, and work participation. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, emotional strain, insomnia, and adverse outcomes, according to VAPAIN guidelines. Analyses were made post-intervention, which was defined as the assessment point immediately following the intervention or at the first-time measurement conducted after the intervention period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 15 studies (total population, n = 764) were incorporated. Most common interventions were cognitive behavioural programmes including acceptance and commitment therapy (n = 4), mindfulness-based interventions (n = 5), and yoga (n  =  2). Psychological interventions reduced both pain intensity (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.10) and pain-related disability (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.03), whereas other interventions had an effect on pain intensity but not on pain-related disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rehabilitation interventions, and psychological interventions in particular, seem to be of value for patients with chronic neuropathic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rehabilitation interventions for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Bäckryd, Nazdar Ghafouri, Björn Gerdle, Elena Dragioti\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/jrm.v56.40188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rehabilitation interventions for chronic pain typically include education, cognitive behavioural therapy, and exercise therapy, or a combination of these. A systematic review and meta-analysis of rehabilitation interventions for neuropathic pain was conducted.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trials were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO databases from inception up to 3 March 2022.</p><p><strong>Subjects/patients: </strong>Adults with chronic (> 3 months) neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary outcomes were pain intensity, pain-related disability, and work participation. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, emotional strain, insomnia, and adverse outcomes, according to VAPAIN guidelines. Analyses were made post-intervention, which was defined as the assessment point immediately following the intervention or at the first-time measurement conducted after the intervention period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 15 studies (total population, n = 764) were incorporated. Most common interventions were cognitive behavioural programmes including acceptance and commitment therapy (n = 4), mindfulness-based interventions (n = 5), and yoga (n  =  2). Psychological interventions reduced both pain intensity (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.10) and pain-related disability (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.03), whereas other interventions had an effect on pain intensity but not on pain-related disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rehabilitation interventions, and psychological interventions in particular, seem to be of value for patients with chronic neuropathic pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318642/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.40188\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.40188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:针对慢性疼痛的康复干预措施通常包括教育、认知行为疗法和运动疗法,或这些疗法的组合。我们对神经性疼痛的康复干预措施进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析:随机对照试验在 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 PsycINFO 数据库中进行了检索,检索时间从开始至 2022 年 3 月 3 日:研究对象/患者:患有慢性(3 个月以上)神经性疼痛的成人:主要结果为疼痛强度、疼痛相关残疾和工作参与度。根据VAPAIN指南,次要结果为生活质量、情绪压力、失眠和不良后果。分析是在干预后进行的,即在干预后立即进行评估或在干预期后进行首次测量:共纳入 15 项研究(总人数为 764 人)。最常见的干预措施是认知行为疗法,包括接受和承诺疗法(4 项)、正念干预(5 项)和瑜伽(2 项)。心理干预可降低疼痛强度(SMD -0.49,95% CI -0.88至-0.10)和疼痛相关残疾(SMD -0.51,95% CI -0.98至-0.03),而其他干预对疼痛强度有影响,但对疼痛相关残疾没有影响:结论:康复干预措施,尤其是心理干预措施,似乎对慢性神经性疼痛患者很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rehabilitation interventions for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Objective: Rehabilitation interventions for chronic pain typically include education, cognitive behavioural therapy, and exercise therapy, or a combination of these. A systematic review and meta-analysis of rehabilitation interventions for neuropathic pain was conducted.

Design: Randomized controlled trials were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO databases from inception up to 3 March 2022.

Subjects/patients: Adults with chronic (> 3 months) neuropathic pain.

Methods: Primary outcomes were pain intensity, pain-related disability, and work participation. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, emotional strain, insomnia, and adverse outcomes, according to VAPAIN guidelines. Analyses were made post-intervention, which was defined as the assessment point immediately following the intervention or at the first-time measurement conducted after the intervention period.

Results: In total, 15 studies (total population, n = 764) were incorporated. Most common interventions were cognitive behavioural programmes including acceptance and commitment therapy (n = 4), mindfulness-based interventions (n = 5), and yoga (n  =  2). Psychological interventions reduced both pain intensity (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.10) and pain-related disability (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.03), whereas other interventions had an effect on pain intensity but not on pain-related disability.

Conclusion: Rehabilitation interventions, and psychological interventions in particular, seem to be of value for patients with chronic neuropathic pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy observation of combined transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on gait in 169 subacute stroke patients. Ambulation recovery prediction after hip fracture surgery using the Hip Fracture Short-Term Ambulation Prediction tool. Screening cutoff values to identify the risk of falls after stroke: A scoping review. Risk-taking behaviour and executive functions, a major component of the risk of fall factors after recent stroke. The effects of rehabilitation potential on activities of daily living in patients with stroke in Taiwan: a prospective longitudinal study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1