美国重症监护室的跨专业人员配置模式集群。

Hayley B Gershengorn, Deena Kelly Costa, Allan Garland, Danny Lizano, Hannah Wunsch
{"title":"美国重症监护室的跨专业人员配置模式集群。","authors":"Hayley B Gershengorn, Deena Kelly Costa, Allan Garland, Danny Lizano, Hannah Wunsch","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify interprofessional staffing pattern clusters used in U.S. ICUs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Latent class analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Adult U.S. ICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>We used data from a staffing survey that queried respondents (<i>n</i> = 596 ICUs) on provider (intensivist and nonintensivist), nursing, respiratory therapist, and clinical pharmacist availability and roles. We used latent class analysis to identify clusters describing interprofessional staffing patterns and then compared ICU and hospital characteristics across clusters.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We identified three clusters as optimal. Most ICUs (54.2%) were in cluster 1 (\"higher overall staffing\") characterized by a higher likelihood of good provider coverage (both intensivist [onsite 24 hr/d] and nonintensivist [orders placed by ICU team exclusively, presence of advanced practice providers, and physicians-in-training]), nursing leadership (presence of charge nurse, nurse educators, and managers), and bedside nursing support (nurses with registered nursing degrees, fewer patients per nurse, and nursing aide availability). One-third (33.7%) were in cluster 2 (\"lower intensivist coverage & nursing leadership, higher bedside nursing support\") and 12.1% were in cluster 3 (\"higher provider coverage & nursing leadership, lower bedside nursing support\"). Clinical pharmacists were more common in cluster 1 (99.4%), but present in greater than 85% of all ICUs; respiratory therapists were nearly universal. Cluster 1 ICUs were larger (median 20 beds vs. 15 and 17 in clusters 2 and 3, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and in larger (> 250 beds: 80.6% vs. 66.1% and 48.5%; <i>p</i> < 0.001), not-for-profit (75.9% vs. 69.4% and 60.3%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) hospitals. Telemedicine use 24 hr/d was more common in cluster 3 units (71.8% vs. 11.7% and 14.1%; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More than half of U.S. ICUs had higher staffing overall. Others tended to have either higher provider presence and nursing leadership or higher bedside nursing support, but not both.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"6 8","pages":"e1138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interprofessional Staffing Pattern Clusters in U.S. ICUs.\",\"authors\":\"Hayley B Gershengorn, Deena Kelly Costa, Allan Garland, Danny Lizano, Hannah Wunsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify interprofessional staffing pattern clusters used in U.S. ICUs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Latent class analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Adult U.S. ICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>We used data from a staffing survey that queried respondents (<i>n</i> = 596 ICUs) on provider (intensivist and nonintensivist), nursing, respiratory therapist, and clinical pharmacist availability and roles. We used latent class analysis to identify clusters describing interprofessional staffing patterns and then compared ICU and hospital characteristics across clusters.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We identified three clusters as optimal. Most ICUs (54.2%) were in cluster 1 (\\\"higher overall staffing\\\") characterized by a higher likelihood of good provider coverage (both intensivist [onsite 24 hr/d] and nonintensivist [orders placed by ICU team exclusively, presence of advanced practice providers, and physicians-in-training]), nursing leadership (presence of charge nurse, nurse educators, and managers), and bedside nursing support (nurses with registered nursing degrees, fewer patients per nurse, and nursing aide availability). One-third (33.7%) were in cluster 2 (\\\"lower intensivist coverage & nursing leadership, higher bedside nursing support\\\") and 12.1% were in cluster 3 (\\\"higher provider coverage & nursing leadership, lower bedside nursing support\\\"). Clinical pharmacists were more common in cluster 1 (99.4%), but present in greater than 85% of all ICUs; respiratory therapists were nearly universal. Cluster 1 ICUs were larger (median 20 beds vs. 15 and 17 in clusters 2 and 3, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and in larger (> 250 beds: 80.6% vs. 66.1% and 48.5%; <i>p</i> < 0.001), not-for-profit (75.9% vs. 69.4% and 60.3%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) hospitals. Telemedicine use 24 hr/d was more common in cluster 3 units (71.8% vs. 11.7% and 14.1%; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More than half of U.S. ICUs had higher staffing overall. Others tended to have either higher provider presence and nursing leadership or higher bedside nursing support, but not both.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"6 8\",\"pages\":\"e1138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296427/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:确定美国重症监护病房使用的跨专业人员配置模式群:确定美国重症监护室使用的跨专业人员配置模式群组:环境和参与者:美国成人重症监护病房:患者:无:患者:无:分析我们使用了一项人员配置调查的数据,该调查询问了受访者(n = 596 个 ICU)有关提供者(重症监护医生和非重症监护医生)、护理人员、呼吸治疗师和临床药剂师的可用性和角色。我们使用潜类分析法确定了描述跨专业人员配置模式的聚类,然后比较了不同聚类的 ICU 和医院特征:我们确定了三个最佳群组。大多数 ICU(54.2%)属于第 1 组("整体人员配置较高"),其特点是更有可能获得良好的医疗服务提供者覆盖(包括重症医学专家[24 小时/天在现场]和非重症医学专家[由 ICU 团队专门下达医嘱、高级医疗服务提供者和受训医师的存在])、护理领导力(主管护士、护士教育者和管理人员的存在)和床旁护理支持(拥有注册护理学位的护士、每名护士负责的病人较少以及护理助手的可用性)。三分之一(33.7%)的患者属于第 2 组("强化治疗师覆盖率和护理领导力较低,床旁护理支持较高"),12.1% 的患者属于第 3 组("提供者覆盖率和护理领导力较高,床旁护理支持较低")。临床药剂师在群组 1 中更为常见(99.4%),但在超过 85% 的重症监护病房中都有临床药剂师的身影;呼吸治疗师几乎是普遍存在的。第 1 组重症监护病房的规模更大(中位数为 20 张床位,而第 2 组和第 3 组分别为 15 张和 17 张床位;P < 0.001),而且位于规模更大(> 250 张床位:80.6%,66.1% 和 48.5%;P < 0.001)的非营利性医院(75.9%,69.4% 和 60.3%;P < 0.001)。在第 3 组医院中,每天 24 小时使用远程医疗的情况更为普遍(71.8% 对 11.7% 和 14.1%;P < 0.001):结论:半数以上的美国重症监护病房总体人员配置较高。结论:半数以上的美国重症监护病房总体人员配备较高,而其他重症监护病房的人员配备往往要么是提供者和护理领导力较高,要么是床旁护理支持较高,但并非两者都高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interprofessional Staffing Pattern Clusters in U.S. ICUs.

Objectives: To identify interprofessional staffing pattern clusters used in U.S. ICUs.

Design: Latent class analysis.

Setting and participants: Adult U.S. ICUs.

Patients: None.

Interventions: None.

Analysis: We used data from a staffing survey that queried respondents (n = 596 ICUs) on provider (intensivist and nonintensivist), nursing, respiratory therapist, and clinical pharmacist availability and roles. We used latent class analysis to identify clusters describing interprofessional staffing patterns and then compared ICU and hospital characteristics across clusters.

Measurements and main results: We identified three clusters as optimal. Most ICUs (54.2%) were in cluster 1 ("higher overall staffing") characterized by a higher likelihood of good provider coverage (both intensivist [onsite 24 hr/d] and nonintensivist [orders placed by ICU team exclusively, presence of advanced practice providers, and physicians-in-training]), nursing leadership (presence of charge nurse, nurse educators, and managers), and bedside nursing support (nurses with registered nursing degrees, fewer patients per nurse, and nursing aide availability). One-third (33.7%) were in cluster 2 ("lower intensivist coverage & nursing leadership, higher bedside nursing support") and 12.1% were in cluster 3 ("higher provider coverage & nursing leadership, lower bedside nursing support"). Clinical pharmacists were more common in cluster 1 (99.4%), but present in greater than 85% of all ICUs; respiratory therapists were nearly universal. Cluster 1 ICUs were larger (median 20 beds vs. 15 and 17 in clusters 2 and 3, respectively; p < 0.001), and in larger (> 250 beds: 80.6% vs. 66.1% and 48.5%; p < 0.001), not-for-profit (75.9% vs. 69.4% and 60.3%; p < 0.001) hospitals. Telemedicine use 24 hr/d was more common in cluster 3 units (71.8% vs. 11.7% and 14.1%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: More than half of U.S. ICUs had higher staffing overall. Others tended to have either higher provider presence and nursing leadership or higher bedside nursing support, but not both.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Awake" Cannulation of Patients for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygen: An Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Current Emergency Medical Service Vasoactive Use for the Management of Shock. Critical Data for Critical Care: A Primer on Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data for Research From Society of Critical Care Medicine's Panel on Data Sharing and Harmonization. Clinical Subtype Trajectories in Sepsis Patients Admitted to the ICU: A Secondary Analysis of an Observational Study. Septic Shock Requiring Three Vasopressors: Patient Demographics and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1