在斯普拉格-道利大鼠的 90 天鼻接触中评估香料化学品混合物。

Michael J Oldham, Rahat Wadhwa Desai, James Randazzo, Brent E Walling, Guy Lalonde, Roxana Weil
{"title":"在斯普拉格-道利大鼠的 90 天鼻接触中评估香料化学品混合物。","authors":"Michael J Oldham, Rahat Wadhwa Desai, James Randazzo, Brent E Walling, Guy Lalonde, Roxana Weil","doi":"10.1177/09603271241269022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the challenges to using some flavor chemicals in aerosol products is the lack of route of administration specific toxicology data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Flavor chemicals (88) were divided into four different flavor mixtures based upon chemical compatibility and evaluated in 2-week dose-range-finding and subsequent 90-day nose-only rodent inhalation studies (OECD 413 and GLP compliant). Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to vehicle control or one of three increasing concentrations of each flavor mixture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the dose-range-range-finding studies, exposure to flavor mixture four resulted in adverse nasal histopathology in female rats at the high dose, resulting in this flavor mixture not being evaluated in a 90-day study. In the 90-day studies daily exposures to the three flavor mixtures did not induce biologically meaningful adverse effects (food consumption, body weights, respiratory physiology, serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation, urinalysis, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid analysis and terminal organ weights). All histopathology findings were observed in both vehicle control and flavor mixture exposed animals, with similar incidences and/or severities, and therefore were not considered flavor mixture related.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the absence of adverse effects, the no-observed-adverse-effect concentration for each 90-day inhalation study was the highest dose tested, 2.5 mg/L of the aerosolized high dose of the three flavor mixtures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94029,"journal":{"name":"Human & experimental toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of mixtures of flavor chemicals in a 90-day nose-only exposures in sprague-dawley rats.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Oldham, Rahat Wadhwa Desai, James Randazzo, Brent E Walling, Guy Lalonde, Roxana Weil\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09603271241269022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the challenges to using some flavor chemicals in aerosol products is the lack of route of administration specific toxicology data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Flavor chemicals (88) were divided into four different flavor mixtures based upon chemical compatibility and evaluated in 2-week dose-range-finding and subsequent 90-day nose-only rodent inhalation studies (OECD 413 and GLP compliant). Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to vehicle control or one of three increasing concentrations of each flavor mixture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the dose-range-range-finding studies, exposure to flavor mixture four resulted in adverse nasal histopathology in female rats at the high dose, resulting in this flavor mixture not being evaluated in a 90-day study. In the 90-day studies daily exposures to the three flavor mixtures did not induce biologically meaningful adverse effects (food consumption, body weights, respiratory physiology, serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation, urinalysis, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid analysis and terminal organ weights). All histopathology findings were observed in both vehicle control and flavor mixture exposed animals, with similar incidences and/or severities, and therefore were not considered flavor mixture related.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the absence of adverse effects, the no-observed-adverse-effect concentration for each 90-day inhalation study was the highest dose tested, 2.5 mg/L of the aerosolized high dose of the three flavor mixtures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human & experimental toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human & experimental toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09603271241269022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human & experimental toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09603271241269022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在气雾剂产品中使用某些香料化学品所面临的挑战之一是缺乏特定给药途径的毒理学数据:根据化学兼容性将香料化学品(88 种)分为四种不同的香料混合物,并在为期两周的剂量范围测定和随后为期 90 天的啮齿动物纯鼻吸入研究中进行了评估(符合 OECD 413 和 GLP 标准)。Sprague-Dawley 大鼠暴露于车辆对照或三种浓度递增的每种香料混合物中的一种:结果:在剂量范围测定研究中,雌性大鼠接触高剂量的四号香料混合物会导致鼻腔组织病理学不良反应,因此该香料混合物未在 90 天研究中进行评估。在 90 天的研究中,每天接触这三种香料混合物不会引起生物学意义上的不良影响(食物消耗量、体重、呼吸生理、血清化学、血液学、凝血、尿液分析、支气管肺泡灌洗液分析和末端器官重量)。所有组织病理学结果在车辆对照组和暴露于香料混合物的动物中均可观察到,发生率和/或严重程度相似,因此不认为与香料混合物有关:结论:由于没有发现不良反应,因此每项 90 天吸入研究的无不良反应浓度为测试的最高剂量,即三种香料混合物的 2.5 毫克/升高剂量气雾剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of mixtures of flavor chemicals in a 90-day nose-only exposures in sprague-dawley rats.

Background: One of the challenges to using some flavor chemicals in aerosol products is the lack of route of administration specific toxicology data.

Methods: Flavor chemicals (88) were divided into four different flavor mixtures based upon chemical compatibility and evaluated in 2-week dose-range-finding and subsequent 90-day nose-only rodent inhalation studies (OECD 413 and GLP compliant). Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to vehicle control or one of three increasing concentrations of each flavor mixture.

Results: In the dose-range-range-finding studies, exposure to flavor mixture four resulted in adverse nasal histopathology in female rats at the high dose, resulting in this flavor mixture not being evaluated in a 90-day study. In the 90-day studies daily exposures to the three flavor mixtures did not induce biologically meaningful adverse effects (food consumption, body weights, respiratory physiology, serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation, urinalysis, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid analysis and terminal organ weights). All histopathology findings were observed in both vehicle control and flavor mixture exposed animals, with similar incidences and/or severities, and therefore were not considered flavor mixture related.

Conclusion: Based on the absence of adverse effects, the no-observed-adverse-effect concentration for each 90-day inhalation study was the highest dose tested, 2.5 mg/L of the aerosolized high dose of the three flavor mixtures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Potential induction of hyperkeratosis in rats' cervi by gentamicin via induction of oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis. Gpnmb silencing protects against hyperoxia-induced acute lung injury by inhibition of mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis. Evaluation of Cd-induced cytotoxicity in primary human keratinocytes. The effect of melatonin on capecitabine-induced hepatic and renal toxicity in rats. Evaluation of antioxidant properties and cytotoxicity of brown algae (nizamuddinia zanardinii) in uterine (hela) and pancreatic cancer cell lines (paca-2).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1