{"title":"开始使用乌司替尼或韦多珠单抗的晚期治疗无效和有经验的溃疡性结肠炎患者实际医疗资源利用率的比较。","authors":"Maryia Zhdanava, Sumesh Kachroo, Porpong Boonmak, Sabree Burbage, Aditi Shah, Jill Korsiak, Patrick Lefebvre, Caroline Kerner, Dominic Pilon","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2388839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe and compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to identify adult patients with UC initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab (index date) after 10/21/2019. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. All-cause and UC-related HRU (number of inpatient admissions, inpatient days, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits) were described during the post-index period, and Poisson regression models were used to evaluate associations between index therapy and HRU outcomes. Analyses were performed separately among advanced therapy-naïve or advanced therapy-experienced patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 444 (ustekinumab) and 1,917 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-naïve patients, and 647 (ustekinumab) and 1,152 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-experienced patients were identified. In advanced therapy-naïve patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient days (rate ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.84 [1.15, 3.58]; <i>p</i> = 0.004), emergency department visits (1.39 [1.01, 2.17]; <i>p</i> = 0.044), and outpatient visits (1.81 [1.61, 2.04]; <i>p</i> < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. In advanced therapy-experienced patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient admissions (1.47 [1.06, 2.12]; <i>p</i> = 0.012), inpatient days (2.18 (1.44, 3.71); <i>p</i> < 0.001), and outpatient visits (1.50 (1.19, 1.82); <i>p</i> < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. Results were similar when all-cause HRU was examined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with UC with and without advanced therapy experience, higher rates of all-cause and UC-related HRU were observed among those treated with vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of real-world healthcare resource utilization among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis initiated on ustekinumab or vedolizumab.\",\"authors\":\"Maryia Zhdanava, Sumesh Kachroo, Porpong Boonmak, Sabree Burbage, Aditi Shah, Jill Korsiak, Patrick Lefebvre, Caroline Kerner, Dominic Pilon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03007995.2024.2388839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe and compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to identify adult patients with UC initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab (index date) after 10/21/2019. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. All-cause and UC-related HRU (number of inpatient admissions, inpatient days, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits) were described during the post-index period, and Poisson regression models were used to evaluate associations between index therapy and HRU outcomes. Analyses were performed separately among advanced therapy-naïve or advanced therapy-experienced patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 444 (ustekinumab) and 1,917 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-naïve patients, and 647 (ustekinumab) and 1,152 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-experienced patients were identified. In advanced therapy-naïve patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient days (rate ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.84 [1.15, 3.58]; <i>p</i> = 0.004), emergency department visits (1.39 [1.01, 2.17]; <i>p</i> = 0.044), and outpatient visits (1.81 [1.61, 2.04]; <i>p</i> < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. In advanced therapy-experienced patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient admissions (1.47 [1.06, 2.12]; <i>p</i> = 0.012), inpatient days (2.18 (1.44, 3.71); <i>p</i> < 0.001), and outpatient visits (1.50 (1.19, 1.82); <i>p</i> < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. Results were similar when all-cause HRU was examined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with UC with and without advanced therapy experience, higher rates of all-cause and UC-related HRU were observed among those treated with vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2388839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2388839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的描述并比较美国溃疡性结肠炎(UC)晚期治疗无效患者和有经验患者使用乌司替尼或韦多珠单抗后的医疗资源利用率(HRU):采用IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus去标识数据库(01/01/2015-06/30/2022)中的索赔数据来识别2019年10月21日之后开始使用乌司替尼或维多珠单抗(索引日期)的成年溃疡性结肠炎患者。基线特征采用反概率治疗加权法进行平衡。对指数后期间的全因和 UC 相关 HRU(住院人数、住院天数、急诊就诊次数和门诊就诊次数)进行了描述,并使用泊松回归模型评估指数治疗与 HRU 结果之间的关联。对未接受晚期治疗或有晚期治疗经验的患者分别进行了分析:结果:共确定了444例(乌斯特库单抗)和1917例(维妥珠单抗)晚期治疗无效患者,以及647例(乌斯特库单抗)和1152例(维妥珠单抗)晚期治疗有效患者。在接受过或未接受过晚期治疗的UC患者中,观察到接受韦多珠单抗治疗的患者的全因和UC相关HRU发生率高于接受乌司替尼治疗的患者。
Comparison of real-world healthcare resource utilization among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis initiated on ustekinumab or vedolizumab.
Objectives: To describe and compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab in the United States.
Methods: Claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to identify adult patients with UC initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab (index date) after 10/21/2019. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. All-cause and UC-related HRU (number of inpatient admissions, inpatient days, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits) were described during the post-index period, and Poisson regression models were used to evaluate associations between index therapy and HRU outcomes. Analyses were performed separately among advanced therapy-naïve or advanced therapy-experienced patients.
Results: A total of 444 (ustekinumab) and 1,917 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-naïve patients, and 647 (ustekinumab) and 1,152 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-experienced patients were identified. In advanced therapy-naïve patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient days (rate ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.84 [1.15, 3.58]; p = 0.004), emergency department visits (1.39 [1.01, 2.17]; p = 0.044), and outpatient visits (1.81 [1.61, 2.04]; p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. In advanced therapy-experienced patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient admissions (1.47 [1.06, 2.12]; p = 0.012), inpatient days (2.18 (1.44, 3.71); p < 0.001), and outpatient visits (1.50 (1.19, 1.82); p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. Results were similar when all-cause HRU was examined.
Conclusions: Among patients with UC with and without advanced therapy experience, higher rates of all-cause and UC-related HRU were observed among those treated with vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab.