人工智能关联彩色成像提高了早期胃癌的检测率。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1159/000540728
Youshen Zhao, Osamu Dohi, Tsugitaka Ishida, Naohisa Yoshida, Tomoko Ochiai, Hiroki Mukai, Mayuko Seya, Katsuma Yamauchi, Hajime Miyazaki, Hayato Fukui, Takeshi Yasuda, Naoto Iwai, Ken Inoue, Yoshito Itoh, Xinkai Liu, Ruiyao Zhang, Xin Zhu
{"title":"人工智能关联彩色成像提高了早期胃癌的检测率。","authors":"Youshen Zhao, Osamu Dohi, Tsugitaka Ishida, Naohisa Yoshida, Tomoko Ochiai, Hiroki Mukai, Mayuko Seya, Katsuma Yamauchi, Hajime Miyazaki, Hayato Fukui, Takeshi Yasuda, Naoto Iwai, Ken Inoue, Yoshito Itoh, Xinkai Liu, Ruiyao Zhang, Xin Zhu","doi":"10.1159/000540728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is the most important tool to detect gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we developed a computer-aided detection (CADe) system to detect GC with white light imaging (WLI) and linked color imaging (LCI) modes and aimed to compare the performance of CADe with that of endoscopists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The system was developed based on the deep learning framework from 9,021 images in 385 patients between 2017 and 2020. A total of 116 LCI and WLI videos from 110 patients between 2017 and 2023 were used to evaluate per-case sensitivity and per-frame specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The per-case sensitivity and per-frame specificity of CADe with a confidence level of 0.5 in detecting GC were 78.6% and 93.4% for WLI and 94.0% and 93.3% for LCI, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). The per-case sensitivities of nonexpert endoscopists for WLI and LCI were 45.8% and 80.4%, whereas those of expert endoscopists were 66.7% and 90.6%, respectively. Regarding detectability between CADe and endoscopists, the per-case sensitivities for WLI and LCI were 78.6% and 94.0% in CADe, respectively, which were significantly higher than those for LCI in experts (90.6%, p = 0.004) and those for WLI and LCI in nonexperts (45.8% and 80.4%, respectively, p &lt; 0.001); however, no significant difference for WLI was observed between CADe and experts (p = 0.134).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our CADe system showed significantly better sensitivity in detecting GC when used in LCI compared with WLI mode. Moreover, the sensitivity of CADe using LCI is significantly higher than those of expert endoscopists using LCI to detect GC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linked Color Imaging with Artificial Intelligence Improves the Detection of Early Gastric Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Youshen Zhao, Osamu Dohi, Tsugitaka Ishida, Naohisa Yoshida, Tomoko Ochiai, Hiroki Mukai, Mayuko Seya, Katsuma Yamauchi, Hajime Miyazaki, Hayato Fukui, Takeshi Yasuda, Naoto Iwai, Ken Inoue, Yoshito Itoh, Xinkai Liu, Ruiyao Zhang, Xin Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is the most important tool to detect gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we developed a computer-aided detection (CADe) system to detect GC with white light imaging (WLI) and linked color imaging (LCI) modes and aimed to compare the performance of CADe with that of endoscopists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The system was developed based on the deep learning framework from 9,021 images in 385 patients between 2017 and 2020. A total of 116 LCI and WLI videos from 110 patients between 2017 and 2023 were used to evaluate per-case sensitivity and per-frame specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The per-case sensitivity and per-frame specificity of CADe with a confidence level of 0.5 in detecting GC were 78.6% and 93.4% for WLI and 94.0% and 93.3% for LCI, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). The per-case sensitivities of nonexpert endoscopists for WLI and LCI were 45.8% and 80.4%, whereas those of expert endoscopists were 66.7% and 90.6%, respectively. Regarding detectability between CADe and endoscopists, the per-case sensitivities for WLI and LCI were 78.6% and 94.0% in CADe, respectively, which were significantly higher than those for LCI in experts (90.6%, p = 0.004) and those for WLI and LCI in nonexperts (45.8% and 80.4%, respectively, p &lt; 0.001); however, no significant difference for WLI was observed between CADe and experts (p = 0.134).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our CADe system showed significantly better sensitivity in detecting GC when used in LCI compared with WLI mode. Moreover, the sensitivity of CADe using LCI is significantly higher than those of expert endoscopists using LCI to detect GC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540728\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)是检测胃癌(GC)最重要的工具。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种计算机辅助系统(CADe),利用白光成像(WLI)和联动彩色成像(LCI)模式检测胃癌(GC),并将 CADe 的性能与内镜医师的性能进行比较:该系统是基于深度学习框架从2017年至2020年间385名患者的9021张图像中开发出来的。2017年至2023年间,共有110名患者的116个LCI和WLI视频被用于评估每例灵敏度和每帧特异性:在置信度为 0.5 的情况下,CADe 检测 GC 的每例灵敏度和每帧特异性分别为:WLI 78.6% 和 93.4%,LCI 94.0% 和 93.3%(P <0.001)。非专业内镜医师对WLI和LCI的每例敏感度分别为45.8%和80.4%,而专业内镜医师的敏感度分别为66.7%和90.6%。关于CADe与内镜医师之间的可检测性,CADe对WLI和LCI的每例敏感度分别为78.6%和94.0%,显著高于内镜医师对LCI的敏感度(90.6%,P = 0.004)和非内镜医师对WLI和LCI的敏感度(分别为45.8%和80.4%,P <0.0001);然而,CADe与内镜医师对WLI的敏感度无显著差异(P = 0.134):我们的 CADe 系统在 LCI 模式下检测 GC 的灵敏度明显高于 WLI 模式。此外,使用 LCI 的 CADe 的灵敏度明显高于使用 LCI 的内镜专家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Linked Color Imaging with Artificial Intelligence Improves the Detection of Early Gastric Cancer.

Introduction: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is the most important tool to detect gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we developed a computer-aided detection (CADe) system to detect GC with white light imaging (WLI) and linked color imaging (LCI) modes and aimed to compare the performance of CADe with that of endoscopists.

Methods: The system was developed based on the deep learning framework from 9,021 images in 385 patients between 2017 and 2020. A total of 116 LCI and WLI videos from 110 patients between 2017 and 2023 were used to evaluate per-case sensitivity and per-frame specificity.

Results: The per-case sensitivity and per-frame specificity of CADe with a confidence level of 0.5 in detecting GC were 78.6% and 93.4% for WLI and 94.0% and 93.3% for LCI, respectively (p < 0.001). The per-case sensitivities of nonexpert endoscopists for WLI and LCI were 45.8% and 80.4%, whereas those of expert endoscopists were 66.7% and 90.6%, respectively. Regarding detectability between CADe and endoscopists, the per-case sensitivities for WLI and LCI were 78.6% and 94.0% in CADe, respectively, which were significantly higher than those for LCI in experts (90.6%, p = 0.004) and those for WLI and LCI in nonexperts (45.8% and 80.4%, respectively, p < 0.001); however, no significant difference for WLI was observed between CADe and experts (p = 0.134).

Conclusions: Our CADe system showed significantly better sensitivity in detecting GC when used in LCI compared with WLI mode. Moreover, the sensitivity of CADe using LCI is significantly higher than those of expert endoscopists using LCI to detect GC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases
Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.
期刊最新文献
Esophageal varices as an independent predictor of fatal outcomes after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration in patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Efficacy of Beclomethasone Dipropionate in Lowering Fecal Calprotectin Levels in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Remission and at Risk of Relapse: The Becalcu Randomized, Controlled Trial. Prevalence of Helminth Infections in Patients with Celiac Disease. Adverse Events after Different Endoscopic Resection Procedures for Small and Intermediate-Sized Colorectal Polyps. Is Cholecystectomy Necessary after Choledocholithiasis Treatment for the Elderly or Patients with Many Comorbidities?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1