探索自体造血干细胞移植对进行性多发性硬化症的治疗潜力--系统综述。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1111/ene.16427
Bente Braun, Felix Fischbach, Lena Kristina Pfeffer, Johanna Richter, Dietlinde Janson, Nicolaus M Kröger, Alice Mariottini, Christoph Heesen, Vivien Häußler
{"title":"探索自体造血干细胞移植对进行性多发性硬化症的治疗潜力--系统综述。","authors":"Bente Braun, Felix Fischbach, Lena Kristina Pfeffer, Johanna Richter, Dietlinde Janson, Nicolaus M Kröger, Alice Mariottini, Christoph Heesen, Vivien Häußler","doi":"10.1111/ene.16427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The aim was to determine the value of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) as a therapeutic intervention for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) based on a systematic review of the current literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All studies from the databases PubMed and Google Scholar published in English before February 2024 which provided individual data for PMS patients were systematically reviewed. PICO was defined as population (P), primary progressive MS and secondary progressive MS patients; intervention (I), treatment with aHSCT; comparison (C), none, disease-modifying therapy treated/relapsing-remitting MS cohorts if available; outcome (O), transplant-related mortality, progression-free survival (PFS) and no evidence of disease activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies met the criteria including 665 patients with PMS (74 primary progressive MS, 591 secondary progressive MS) and 801 patients with relapsing-remitting MS as controls. PFS data were available for 647 patients. PMS patients showed more severe disability at baseline than relapsing-remitting MS patients. The average transplant-related mortality for PMS in 10 studies was 1.9%, with 10 deaths in 528 patients. PFS ranged from 0% to 78% in PMS groups 5 years after treatment initiation, demonstrating a high variability. No evidence of disease activity scores at 5 years ranged from 0% to 75%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the available data, aHSCT does not halt progression in people with PMS. However, there appears to be evidence of improved outcome in selected patients. Due to the heterogeneity of the available data, more comprehensive clinical trials assessing the efficacy of aHSCT across different patient groups are urgently needed to reduce variability and improve patient stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":11954,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the therapeutic potential of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in progressive multiple sclerosis-a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Bente Braun, Felix Fischbach, Lena Kristina Pfeffer, Johanna Richter, Dietlinde Janson, Nicolaus M Kröger, Alice Mariottini, Christoph Heesen, Vivien Häußler\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ene.16427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The aim was to determine the value of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) as a therapeutic intervention for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) based on a systematic review of the current literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All studies from the databases PubMed and Google Scholar published in English before February 2024 which provided individual data for PMS patients were systematically reviewed. PICO was defined as population (P), primary progressive MS and secondary progressive MS patients; intervention (I), treatment with aHSCT; comparison (C), none, disease-modifying therapy treated/relapsing-remitting MS cohorts if available; outcome (O), transplant-related mortality, progression-free survival (PFS) and no evidence of disease activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies met the criteria including 665 patients with PMS (74 primary progressive MS, 591 secondary progressive MS) and 801 patients with relapsing-remitting MS as controls. PFS data were available for 647 patients. PMS patients showed more severe disability at baseline than relapsing-remitting MS patients. The average transplant-related mortality for PMS in 10 studies was 1.9%, with 10 deaths in 528 patients. PFS ranged from 0% to 78% in PMS groups 5 years after treatment initiation, demonstrating a high variability. No evidence of disease activity scores at 5 years ranged from 0% to 75%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the available data, aHSCT does not halt progression in people with PMS. However, there appears to be evidence of improved outcome in selected patients. Due to the heterogeneity of the available data, more comprehensive clinical trials assessing the efficacy of aHSCT across different patient groups are urgently needed to reduce variability and improve patient stratification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.16427\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.16427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:本研究旨在通过对现有文献进行系统回顾,确定自体造血干细胞移植(aHSCT)作为进行性多发性硬化症(PMS)治疗干预措施的价值:方法:系统回顾了PubMed和谷歌学术数据库中2024年2月之前发表的所有提供PMS患者个体数据的英文研究。PICO的定义为:人群(P),原发性进展型多发性硬化症和继发性进展型多发性硬化症患者;干预(I),接受aHSCT治疗;比较(C),无,疾病修饰疗法治疗/复发缓解型多发性硬化症队列(如有);结果(O),移植相关死亡率、无进展生存期(PFS)和无疾病活动证据:共有15项研究符合标准,其中包括665名PMS患者(74名原发性进展型多发性硬化症患者,591名继发性进展型多发性硬化症患者)和801名复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者作为对照。647名患者获得了PFS数据。与复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者相比,原发性进展型多发性硬化症患者在基线时表现出更严重的残疾。在10项研究中,PMS的平均移植相关死亡率为1.9%,528名患者中有10人死亡。开始治疗5年后,PMS组的PFS从0%到78%不等,显示出很高的变异性。5年后无疾病活动证据评分从0%到75%不等:根据现有数据,aHSCT并不能阻止PMS患者的病情进展。结论:根据现有数据,接受造血干细胞移植并不能阻止 PMS 患者的病情恶化,但似乎有证据表明,部分患者的预后有所改善。由于现有数据的异质性,迫切需要更全面的临床试验来评估aHSCT在不同患者群体中的疗效,以减少变异性并改善患者分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the therapeutic potential of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in progressive multiple sclerosis-a systematic review.

Background and purpose: The aim was to determine the value of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) as a therapeutic intervention for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) based on a systematic review of the current literature.

Methods: All studies from the databases PubMed and Google Scholar published in English before February 2024 which provided individual data for PMS patients were systematically reviewed. PICO was defined as population (P), primary progressive MS and secondary progressive MS patients; intervention (I), treatment with aHSCT; comparison (C), none, disease-modifying therapy treated/relapsing-remitting MS cohorts if available; outcome (O), transplant-related mortality, progression-free survival (PFS) and no evidence of disease activity.

Results: A total of 15 studies met the criteria including 665 patients with PMS (74 primary progressive MS, 591 secondary progressive MS) and 801 patients with relapsing-remitting MS as controls. PFS data were available for 647 patients. PMS patients showed more severe disability at baseline than relapsing-remitting MS patients. The average transplant-related mortality for PMS in 10 studies was 1.9%, with 10 deaths in 528 patients. PFS ranged from 0% to 78% in PMS groups 5 years after treatment initiation, demonstrating a high variability. No evidence of disease activity scores at 5 years ranged from 0% to 75%.

Conclusion: Based on the available data, aHSCT does not halt progression in people with PMS. However, there appears to be evidence of improved outcome in selected patients. Due to the heterogeneity of the available data, more comprehensive clinical trials assessing the efficacy of aHSCT across different patient groups are urgently needed to reduce variability and improve patient stratification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neurology
European Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
418
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Neurology is the official journal of the European Academy of Neurology and covers all areas of clinical and basic research in neurology, including pre-clinical research of immediate translational value for new potential treatments. Emphasis is placed on major diseases of large clinical and socio-economic importance (dementia, stroke, epilepsy, headache, multiple sclerosis, movement disorders, and infectious diseases).
期刊最新文献
Effect of enzyme substitution therapy on brain magnetic resonance imaging and cognition in adults with phenylketonuria: A case series of three patients. Immune triggers preceding neuralgic amyotrophy. Cerebral venous thrombosis in elderly patients. Cholinergic dysfunction in isolated rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder links to impending phenoconversion. Impact of elevated lipoprotein(a) levels on the functional outcomes of ischemic stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1