荷兰一所大学医院向价值导向型医疗服务转变的十年:一项以复杂性为依据的过程研究。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Research Policy and Systems Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1186/s12961-024-01181-z
Veerle van Engen, Martina Buljac-Samardzic, Rob Baatenburg de Jong, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Kees Ahaus, Monique Den Hollander-Ardon, Ingrid Peters, Igna Bonfrer
{"title":"荷兰一所大学医院向价值导向型医疗服务转变的十年:一项以复杂性为依据的过程研究。","authors":"Veerle van Engen, Martina Buljac-Samardzic, Rob Baatenburg de Jong, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Kees Ahaus, Monique Den Hollander-Ardon, Ingrid Peters, Igna Bonfrer","doi":"10.1186/s12961-024-01181-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While healthcare organizations in several countries are embracing Value-Based Health Care (VBHC), there are limited insights into how to achieve this paradigm shift. This study examines the decade-long (2012-2023) change towards VBHC in a pioneering Dutch university hospital.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Through retrospective, complexity-informed process research, we study how a Dutch university hospital's strategy to implement VBHC evolved, how implementation outcomes unfolded, and the underlying logic behind these developments. Data include the hospital's internal documents (n = 10,536), implementation outcome indicators (n = 4), a survey among clinicians (n = 47), and interviews with individuals contributing to VBHC at the hospital level (n = 20).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The change towards VBHC is characterized by three sequential strategies. Initially, the focus was on deep change through local, tailored implementation of multiple VBHC elements. The strategy then transitioned to a hospital-wide program aimed at evolutionary change on a large scale, emphasizing the integration of VBHC into mainstream IT and policies. Recognizing the advantages and limitations of both strategies, the hospital currently adopts a \"hybrid\" strategy. This strategy delicately combines deep and broad change efforts. The strategy evolved based on accumulated insights, contextual developments and shifts in decision-makers. The complexity of change was downplayed in plans and stakeholder communication. By the end of 2023, 68 (sub)departments engaged in VBHC, enabled to discuss patients' responses to Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) during outpatient care. However, clinicians' use of PROMs data showed limitations. While pioneers delved deeper into VBHC, laggards have yet to initiate it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VBHC does not lend itself to linear planning and is not easily scalable. While there appears to be no golden standard for implementation, blending local and larger-scale actions appears advantageous. Local, deep yet harmonized and system-integrated changes culminate in large scale transformation. Embracing complexity and focusing on the ultimate aims of (re)institutionalization and (re)professionalization are crucial.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"22 1","pages":"94"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11301982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A decade of change towards Value-Based Health Care at a Dutch University Hospital: a complexity-informed process study.\",\"authors\":\"Veerle van Engen, Martina Buljac-Samardzic, Rob Baatenburg de Jong, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Kees Ahaus, Monique Den Hollander-Ardon, Ingrid Peters, Igna Bonfrer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12961-024-01181-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While healthcare organizations in several countries are embracing Value-Based Health Care (VBHC), there are limited insights into how to achieve this paradigm shift. This study examines the decade-long (2012-2023) change towards VBHC in a pioneering Dutch university hospital.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Through retrospective, complexity-informed process research, we study how a Dutch university hospital's strategy to implement VBHC evolved, how implementation outcomes unfolded, and the underlying logic behind these developments. Data include the hospital's internal documents (n = 10,536), implementation outcome indicators (n = 4), a survey among clinicians (n = 47), and interviews with individuals contributing to VBHC at the hospital level (n = 20).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The change towards VBHC is characterized by three sequential strategies. Initially, the focus was on deep change through local, tailored implementation of multiple VBHC elements. The strategy then transitioned to a hospital-wide program aimed at evolutionary change on a large scale, emphasizing the integration of VBHC into mainstream IT and policies. Recognizing the advantages and limitations of both strategies, the hospital currently adopts a \\\"hybrid\\\" strategy. This strategy delicately combines deep and broad change efforts. The strategy evolved based on accumulated insights, contextual developments and shifts in decision-makers. The complexity of change was downplayed in plans and stakeholder communication. By the end of 2023, 68 (sub)departments engaged in VBHC, enabled to discuss patients' responses to Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) during outpatient care. However, clinicians' use of PROMs data showed limitations. While pioneers delved deeper into VBHC, laggards have yet to initiate it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VBHC does not lend itself to linear planning and is not easily scalable. While there appears to be no golden standard for implementation, blending local and larger-scale actions appears advantageous. Local, deep yet harmonized and system-integrated changes culminate in large scale transformation. Embracing complexity and focusing on the ultimate aims of (re)institutionalization and (re)professionalization are crucial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11301982/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01181-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01181-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然多个国家的医疗机构都在推行基于价值的医疗保健(VBHC),但对如何实现这一模式转变的见解却很有限。本研究探讨了荷兰一所大学医院在长达十年(2012-2023 年)的时间里向 VBHC 的转变:通过回顾性、复杂性过程研究,我们研究了一家荷兰大学医院实施 VBHC 的战略是如何演变的,实施结果是如何展开的,以及这些发展背后的内在逻辑。数据包括医院的内部文件(n = 10,536)、实施结果指标(n = 4)、临床医生调查(n = 47)以及对医院层面为 VBHC 做出贡献的个人的访谈(n = 20):结果:向 VBHC 的转变有三个连续的策略。最初,重点是通过在当地有针对性地实施多种 VBHC 要素来实现深度变革。随后,该战略过渡到一项全院范围的计划,旨在进行大规模的变革,强调将 VBHC 纳入主流信息技术和政策。由于认识到这两种战略的优势和局限性,医院目前采取了一种 "混合 "战略。这一战略巧妙地将深度变革和广度变革结合在一起。该战略是在不断积累的洞察力、背景发展和决策者转变的基础上发展起来的。变革的复杂性在计划和利益相关者沟通中被淡化。到 2023 年底,68 个(分)科室参与了 VBHC,能够在门诊护理期间讨论患者对 "患者报告结果衡量指标"(PROMs)的反应。然而,临床医生对 PROMs 数据的使用存在局限性。虽然先行者在 VBHC 方面做了更深入的研究,但落后者尚未启动 VBHC:VBHC 不适合线性规划,也不容易扩展。虽然在实施方面似乎没有黄金标准,但将地方和更大规模的行动结合起来似乎是有利的。局部的、深入的、协调的和系统集成的变革最终会带来大规模的转变。接受复杂性并关注(重新)制度化和(重新)专业化的最终目标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A decade of change towards Value-Based Health Care at a Dutch University Hospital: a complexity-informed process study.

Background: While healthcare organizations in several countries are embracing Value-Based Health Care (VBHC), there are limited insights into how to achieve this paradigm shift. This study examines the decade-long (2012-2023) change towards VBHC in a pioneering Dutch university hospital.

Method: Through retrospective, complexity-informed process research, we study how a Dutch university hospital's strategy to implement VBHC evolved, how implementation outcomes unfolded, and the underlying logic behind these developments. Data include the hospital's internal documents (n = 10,536), implementation outcome indicators (n = 4), a survey among clinicians (n = 47), and interviews with individuals contributing to VBHC at the hospital level (n = 20).

Results: The change towards VBHC is characterized by three sequential strategies. Initially, the focus was on deep change through local, tailored implementation of multiple VBHC elements. The strategy then transitioned to a hospital-wide program aimed at evolutionary change on a large scale, emphasizing the integration of VBHC into mainstream IT and policies. Recognizing the advantages and limitations of both strategies, the hospital currently adopts a "hybrid" strategy. This strategy delicately combines deep and broad change efforts. The strategy evolved based on accumulated insights, contextual developments and shifts in decision-makers. The complexity of change was downplayed in plans and stakeholder communication. By the end of 2023, 68 (sub)departments engaged in VBHC, enabled to discuss patients' responses to Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) during outpatient care. However, clinicians' use of PROMs data showed limitations. While pioneers delved deeper into VBHC, laggards have yet to initiate it.

Conclusions: VBHC does not lend itself to linear planning and is not easily scalable. While there appears to be no golden standard for implementation, blending local and larger-scale actions appears advantageous. Local, deep yet harmonized and system-integrated changes culminate in large scale transformation. Embracing complexity and focusing on the ultimate aims of (re)institutionalization and (re)professionalization are crucial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
期刊最新文献
The embedded research model: an answer to the research and evaluation needs of community service organizations? Implementation of national policies and interventions (WHO Best Buys) for non-communicable disease prevention and control in Ghana: a mixed methods analysis. Policy impact of the Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team: global perspective and United Kingdom case study. Real-world data to improve organ and tissue donation policies: lessons learned from the tissue and organ donor epidemiology study. "All of these things interact, that's why it's such a wicked problem": Stakeholders' perspectives of what hinders low back pain care in Australia and how to improve it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1