IFEM 示范课程:本科医学教育的急诊医学学习成果。

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE International Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1186/s12245-024-00671-9
Arif Alper Cevik, Elif Dilek Cakal, James Kwan, Simon Chu, Sithembile Mtombeni, Venkataraman Anantharaman, Nicholas Jouriles, David Teng Kuan Peng, Andrew Singer, Peter Cameron, James Ducharme, Abraham Wai, David Edwin Manthey, Cherri Hobgood, Terrence Mulligan, Edgardo Menendez, Juliusz Jakubaszko
{"title":"IFEM 示范课程:本科医学教育的急诊医学学习成果。","authors":"Arif Alper Cevik, Elif Dilek Cakal, James Kwan, Simon Chu, Sithembile Mtombeni, Venkataraman Anantharaman, Nicholas Jouriles, David Teng Kuan Peng, Andrew Singer, Peter Cameron, James Ducharme, Abraham Wai, David Edwin Manthey, Cherri Hobgood, Terrence Mulligan, Edgardo Menendez, Juliusz Jakubaszko","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00671-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) published its model curriculum for medical student education in emergency medicine in 2009. Because of the evolving principles of emergency medicine and medical education, driven by societal, professional, and educational developments, there was a need for an update on IFEM recommendations. The main objective of the update process was creating Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) and providing tier-based recommendations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A consensus methodology combining nominal group and modified Delphi methods was used. The nominal group had 15 members representing eight countries in six regions. The process began with a review of the 2009 curriculum by IFEM Core Curriculum and Education Committee (CCEC) members, followed by a three-phase update process involving survey creation [The final survey document included 55 items in 4 sections, namely, participant & context information (16 items), intended learning outcomes (6 items), principles unique to emergency medicine (20 items), and content unique to emergency medicine (13 items)], participant selection from IFEM member countries and survey implementation, and data analysis to create the recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 112 invitees (CCEC members and IFEM member country nominees), 57 (50.9%) participants from 27 countries participated. Eighteen (31.6%) participants were from LMICs, while 39 (68.4%) were from HICs. Forty-four (77.2%) participants have been involved with medical students' emergency medicine training for more than five years in their careers, and 56 (98.2%) have been involved with medical students' training in the last five years. Thirty-five (61.4%) participants have completed a form of training in medical education. The exercise resulted in the formulation of tiered ILO recommendations. Tier 1 ILOs are recommended for all medical schools, Tier 2 ILOs are recommended for medical schools based on perceived local healthcare system needs and/or adequate resources, and Tier 3 ILOs should be considered for medical schools based on perceived local healthcare system needs and/or adequate resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The updated IFEM ILO recommendations are designed to be applicable across diverse educational and healthcare settings. These recommendations aim to provide a clear framework for medical schools to prepare graduates with essential emergency care capabilities immediately after completing medical school. The successful distribution and implementation of these recommendations hinge on support from faculty and administrators, ensuring that future healthcare professionals are well-prepared for emergency medical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IFEM model curriculum: emergency medicine learning outcomes for undergraduate medical education.\",\"authors\":\"Arif Alper Cevik, Elif Dilek Cakal, James Kwan, Simon Chu, Sithembile Mtombeni, Venkataraman Anantharaman, Nicholas Jouriles, David Teng Kuan Peng, Andrew Singer, Peter Cameron, James Ducharme, Abraham Wai, David Edwin Manthey, Cherri Hobgood, Terrence Mulligan, Edgardo Menendez, Juliusz Jakubaszko\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12245-024-00671-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) published its model curriculum for medical student education in emergency medicine in 2009. Because of the evolving principles of emergency medicine and medical education, driven by societal, professional, and educational developments, there was a need for an update on IFEM recommendations. The main objective of the update process was creating Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) and providing tier-based recommendations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A consensus methodology combining nominal group and modified Delphi methods was used. The nominal group had 15 members representing eight countries in six regions. The process began with a review of the 2009 curriculum by IFEM Core Curriculum and Education Committee (CCEC) members, followed by a three-phase update process involving survey creation [The final survey document included 55 items in 4 sections, namely, participant & context information (16 items), intended learning outcomes (6 items), principles unique to emergency medicine (20 items), and content unique to emergency medicine (13 items)], participant selection from IFEM member countries and survey implementation, and data analysis to create the recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 112 invitees (CCEC members and IFEM member country nominees), 57 (50.9%) participants from 27 countries participated. Eighteen (31.6%) participants were from LMICs, while 39 (68.4%) were from HICs. Forty-four (77.2%) participants have been involved with medical students' emergency medicine training for more than five years in their careers, and 56 (98.2%) have been involved with medical students' training in the last five years. Thirty-five (61.4%) participants have completed a form of training in medical education. The exercise resulted in the formulation of tiered ILO recommendations. Tier 1 ILOs are recommended for all medical schools, Tier 2 ILOs are recommended for medical schools based on perceived local healthcare system needs and/or adequate resources, and Tier 3 ILOs should be considered for medical schools based on perceived local healthcare system needs and/or adequate resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The updated IFEM ILO recommendations are designed to be applicable across diverse educational and healthcare settings. These recommendations aim to provide a clear framework for medical schools to prepare graduates with essential emergency care capabilities immediately after completing medical school. The successful distribution and implementation of these recommendations hinge on support from faculty and administrators, ensuring that future healthcare professionals are well-prepared for emergency medical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302100/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00671-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00671-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国际急诊医学联合会(IFEM)于 2009 年发布了急诊医学医学生教育示范课程。由于急诊医学和医学教育的原则在社会、专业和教育发展的推动下不断演变,因此有必要更新 IFEM 的建议。更新过程的主要目标是创建预期学习成果(ILOs)并提供分层建议:方法:采用了一种结合名义小组和改良德尔菲法的共识方法。名义小组有 15 名成员,代表六个地区的八个国家。该过程首先由 IFEM 核心课程与教育委员会 (CCEC) 成员对 2009 年的课程进行审查,然后分三个阶段进行更新,包括创建调查[最终调查文件包括 4 个部分的 55 个项目,即参与者和背景信息(16 个项目)、预期学习成果(6 个项目)、急诊医学特有原则(20 个项目)和急诊医学特有内容(13 个项目)]、从 IFEM 成员国中挑选参与者和实施调查,以及进行数据分析以创建建议:在 112 位受邀者(CCEC 成员和 IFEM 成员国提名人)中,来自 27 个国家的 57 位(50.9%)参加了调查。18名与会者(31.6%)来自低收入和中等收入国家,39名与会者(68.4%)来自高收入和中等收入国家。44名(77.2%)参与者在其职业生涯中参与医学生急诊医学培训超过五年,56名(98.2%)参与者在过去五年中参与医学生培训。有 35 人(61.4%)参加过某种形式的医学教育培训。通过这项工作,提出了分级 ILO 建议。第 1 级 ILO 建议适用于所有医学院校,第 2 级 ILO 建议根据当地医疗保健系统的需求和/或充足的资源适用于医学院校,第 3 级 ILO 应根据当地医疗保健系统的需求和/或充足的资源适用于医学院校:最新的 IFEM ILO 建议旨在适用于不同的教育和医疗环境。这些建议旨在为医学院提供一个清晰的框架,帮助毕业生在完成医学院学业后立即具备基本的急救能力。这些建议的成功传播和实施取决于教师和管理人员的支持,以确保未来的医疗保健专业人员为急救医疗做好充分准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IFEM model curriculum: emergency medicine learning outcomes for undergraduate medical education.

Background: The International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) published its model curriculum for medical student education in emergency medicine in 2009. Because of the evolving principles of emergency medicine and medical education, driven by societal, professional, and educational developments, there was a need for an update on IFEM recommendations. The main objective of the update process was creating Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) and providing tier-based recommendations.

Method: A consensus methodology combining nominal group and modified Delphi methods was used. The nominal group had 15 members representing eight countries in six regions. The process began with a review of the 2009 curriculum by IFEM Core Curriculum and Education Committee (CCEC) members, followed by a three-phase update process involving survey creation [The final survey document included 55 items in 4 sections, namely, participant & context information (16 items), intended learning outcomes (6 items), principles unique to emergency medicine (20 items), and content unique to emergency medicine (13 items)], participant selection from IFEM member countries and survey implementation, and data analysis to create the recommendations.

Results: Out of 112 invitees (CCEC members and IFEM member country nominees), 57 (50.9%) participants from 27 countries participated. Eighteen (31.6%) participants were from LMICs, while 39 (68.4%) were from HICs. Forty-four (77.2%) participants have been involved with medical students' emergency medicine training for more than five years in their careers, and 56 (98.2%) have been involved with medical students' training in the last five years. Thirty-five (61.4%) participants have completed a form of training in medical education. The exercise resulted in the formulation of tiered ILO recommendations. Tier 1 ILOs are recommended for all medical schools, Tier 2 ILOs are recommended for medical schools based on perceived local healthcare system needs and/or adequate resources, and Tier 3 ILOs should be considered for medical schools based on perceived local healthcare system needs and/or adequate resources.

Conclusion: The updated IFEM ILO recommendations are designed to be applicable across diverse educational and healthcare settings. These recommendations aim to provide a clear framework for medical schools to prepare graduates with essential emergency care capabilities immediately after completing medical school. The successful distribution and implementation of these recommendations hinge on support from faculty and administrators, ensuring that future healthcare professionals are well-prepared for emergency medical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
期刊最新文献
The need for implementing a standardized, evidence-based emergency department discharge plan for optimizing adult asthma patient outcomes in the UAE, expert meeting report. Peri-injury symptomatology as predictors of brain computed tomography (CT) scan abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Epidemiology and outcomes of critically ill patients in the emergency department of a tertiary teaching hospital in Rwanda. How many is enough? Measuring the number of FAST exams needed by emergency medicine trainees to reach competence. Right iliac deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism associated with recreational nitrous oxide: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1