通过电阻抗断层扫描比较神经重症监护中标准呼气末正压 (PEEP) 与个性化呼气末正压 (PEEP):一项试点前瞻性单中心研究。

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Intensive Care Medicine Experimental Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1186/s40635-024-00654-3
Vera Spatenkova, Mikulas Mlcek, Alan Mejstrik, Lukas Cisar, Eduard Kuriscak
{"title":"通过电阻抗断层扫描比较神经重症监护中标准呼气末正压 (PEEP) 与个性化呼气末正压 (PEEP):一项试点前瞻性单中心研究。","authors":"Vera Spatenkova, Mikulas Mlcek, Alan Mejstrik, Lukas Cisar, Eduard Kuriscak","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00654-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individualised bedside adjustment of mechanical ventilation is a standard strategy in acute coma neurocritical care patients. This involves customising positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which could improve ventilation homogeneity and arterial oxygenation. This study aimed to determine whether PEEP titrated by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) results in different lung ventilation homogeneity when compared to standard PEEP of 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O in mechanically ventilated patients with healthy lungs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective single-centre study, we evaluated 55 acute adult neurocritical care patients starting controlled ventilation with PEEPs close to 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Next, the optimal PEEP was identified by EIT-guided decremental PEEP titration, probing PEEP levels between 9 and 2 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and finding the minimal amount of collapse and overdistension. EIT-derived parameters of ventilation homogeneity were evaluated before and after the PEEP titration and after the adjustment of PEEP to its optimal value. Non-EIT-based parameters, such as peripheral capillary Hb saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) and end-tidal pressure of CO<sub>2</sub>, were recorded hourly and analysed before PEEP titration and after PEEP adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean PEEP value before titration was 4.75 ± 0.94 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (ranging from 3 to max 8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O), 4.29 ± 1.24 cmH<sub>2</sub>O after titration and before PEEP adjustment, and 4.26 ± 1.5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O after PEEP adjustment. No statistically significant differences in ventilation homogeneity were observed due to the adjustment of PEEP found by PEEP titration. We also found non-significant changes in non-EIT-based parameters following the PEEP titration and subsequent PEEP adjustment, except for the mean arterial pressure, which dropped statistically significantly (with a mean difference of 3.2 mmHg, 95% CI 0.45 to 6.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjusting PEEP to values derived from PEEP titration guided by EIT does not provide any significant changes in ventilation homogeneity as assessed by EIT to ventilated patients with healthy lungs, provided the change in PEEP does not exceed three cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Thus, a reduction in PEEP determined through PEEP titration that is not greater than 3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O from an initial value of 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O is unlikely to affect ventilation homogeneity significantly, which could benefit mechanically ventilated neurocritical care patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standard versus individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared by electrical impedance tomography in neurocritical care: a pilot prospective single centre study.\",\"authors\":\"Vera Spatenkova, Mikulas Mlcek, Alan Mejstrik, Lukas Cisar, Eduard Kuriscak\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40635-024-00654-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individualised bedside adjustment of mechanical ventilation is a standard strategy in acute coma neurocritical care patients. This involves customising positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which could improve ventilation homogeneity and arterial oxygenation. This study aimed to determine whether PEEP titrated by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) results in different lung ventilation homogeneity when compared to standard PEEP of 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O in mechanically ventilated patients with healthy lungs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective single-centre study, we evaluated 55 acute adult neurocritical care patients starting controlled ventilation with PEEPs close to 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Next, the optimal PEEP was identified by EIT-guided decremental PEEP titration, probing PEEP levels between 9 and 2 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and finding the minimal amount of collapse and overdistension. EIT-derived parameters of ventilation homogeneity were evaluated before and after the PEEP titration and after the adjustment of PEEP to its optimal value. Non-EIT-based parameters, such as peripheral capillary Hb saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) and end-tidal pressure of CO<sub>2</sub>, were recorded hourly and analysed before PEEP titration and after PEEP adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean PEEP value before titration was 4.75 ± 0.94 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (ranging from 3 to max 8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O), 4.29 ± 1.24 cmH<sub>2</sub>O after titration and before PEEP adjustment, and 4.26 ± 1.5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O after PEEP adjustment. No statistically significant differences in ventilation homogeneity were observed due to the adjustment of PEEP found by PEEP titration. We also found non-significant changes in non-EIT-based parameters following the PEEP titration and subsequent PEEP adjustment, except for the mean arterial pressure, which dropped statistically significantly (with a mean difference of 3.2 mmHg, 95% CI 0.45 to 6.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjusting PEEP to values derived from PEEP titration guided by EIT does not provide any significant changes in ventilation homogeneity as assessed by EIT to ventilated patients with healthy lungs, provided the change in PEEP does not exceed three cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Thus, a reduction in PEEP determined through PEEP titration that is not greater than 3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O from an initial value of 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O is unlikely to affect ventilation homogeneity significantly, which could benefit mechanically ventilated neurocritical care patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300775/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00654-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00654-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对急性昏迷的神经重症患者进行个性化床旁机械通气调节是一项标准策略。这包括定制呼气末正压(PEEP),从而改善通气均匀性和动脉氧合。本研究旨在确定在肺部健康的机械通气患者中,与 5 cmH2O 的标准 PEEP 相比,通过电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)滴定的 PEEP 是否会导致不同的肺通气均匀性:在这项前瞻性单中心研究中,我们对 55 名急性成人神经重症患者进行了评估,这些患者在开始控制通气时 PEEP 值接近 5 cmH2O。接下来,通过 EIT 引导的 PEEP 递减滴定来确定最佳 PEEP,探查 9 至 2 cmH2O 之间的 PEEP 水平,并找到塌陷和过度张力的最小量。在 PEEP 滴定前后以及将 PEEP 调整到最佳值后,对 EIT 导出的通气均匀性参数进行了评估。每小时记录并分析 PEEP 滴定前和 PEEP 调整后的非 EIT 参数,如外周毛细血管血红蛋白饱和度(SpO2)和二氧化碳潮气末压:滴定前的平均 PEEP 值为 4.75 ± 0.94 cmH2O(范围从 3 到最大 8 cmH2O),滴定后和 PEEP 调整前为 4.29 ± 1.24 cmH2O,PEEP 调整后为 4.26 ± 1.5 cmH2O。通过 PEEP 滴定发现,PEEP 调整后通气均匀性无明显统计学差异。我们还发现,在 PEEP 滴定和随后的 PEEP 调整后,除平均动脉压显著下降(平均差异为 3.2 mmHg,95% CI 0.45 至 6.0 cmH2O,p)外,其他非基于 EIT 的参数均无显著变化:如果 PEEP 的变化不超过 3 cmH2O,根据 EIT 引导的 PEEP 滴定得出的值调整 PEEP 并不会对肺部健康的通气患者通过 EIT 评估的通气均匀性产生任何明显变化。因此,通过 PEEP 滴定确定的 PEEP 值从初始值 5 cmH2O 降低不超过 3 cmH2O 不太可能对通气均匀性产生重大影响,这可能会使接受机械通气的神经重症患者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standard versus individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared by electrical impedance tomography in neurocritical care: a pilot prospective single centre study.

Background: Individualised bedside adjustment of mechanical ventilation is a standard strategy in acute coma neurocritical care patients. This involves customising positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which could improve ventilation homogeneity and arterial oxygenation. This study aimed to determine whether PEEP titrated by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) results in different lung ventilation homogeneity when compared to standard PEEP of 5 cmH2O in mechanically ventilated patients with healthy lungs.

Methods: In this prospective single-centre study, we evaluated 55 acute adult neurocritical care patients starting controlled ventilation with PEEPs close to 5 cmH2O. Next, the optimal PEEP was identified by EIT-guided decremental PEEP titration, probing PEEP levels between 9 and 2 cmH2O and finding the minimal amount of collapse and overdistension. EIT-derived parameters of ventilation homogeneity were evaluated before and after the PEEP titration and after the adjustment of PEEP to its optimal value. Non-EIT-based parameters, such as peripheral capillary Hb saturation (SpO2) and end-tidal pressure of CO2, were recorded hourly and analysed before PEEP titration and after PEEP adjustment.

Results: The mean PEEP value before titration was 4.75 ± 0.94 cmH2O (ranging from 3 to max 8 cmH2O), 4.29 ± 1.24 cmH2O after titration and before PEEP adjustment, and 4.26 ± 1.5 cmH2O after PEEP adjustment. No statistically significant differences in ventilation homogeneity were observed due to the adjustment of PEEP found by PEEP titration. We also found non-significant changes in non-EIT-based parameters following the PEEP titration and subsequent PEEP adjustment, except for the mean arterial pressure, which dropped statistically significantly (with a mean difference of 3.2 mmHg, 95% CI 0.45 to 6.0 cmH2O, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Adjusting PEEP to values derived from PEEP titration guided by EIT does not provide any significant changes in ventilation homogeneity as assessed by EIT to ventilated patients with healthy lungs, provided the change in PEEP does not exceed three cmH2O. Thus, a reduction in PEEP determined through PEEP titration that is not greater than 3 cmH2O from an initial value of 5 cmH2O is unlikely to affect ventilation homogeneity significantly, which could benefit mechanically ventilated neurocritical care patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of intradialytic hypotension in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy: a systematic review. Is passive leg raising clinically useful in predicting intradialytic hypotension? Largely ignored-but pathogenetically significant: ambient temperature in rodent sepsis models. The development of a C5.0 machine learning model in a limited data set to predict early mortality in patients with ARDS undergoing an initial session of prone positioning. A new method to predict return of spontaneous circulation by peripheral intravenous analysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a rat model pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1