重新设计电子健康记录,优化以患者为中心的癌症护理、质量、监测和研究。

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1200/OP.24.00260
Aditi P Singh, Erin P Balogh, Robert W Carlson, Mary Margaret Huizinga, Bradley A Malin, Alexander Melamed, Neal J Meropol, Etta D Pisano, Robert A Winn, K Robin Yabroff, Lawrence N Shulman
{"title":"重新设计电子健康记录,优化以患者为中心的癌症护理、质量、监测和研究。","authors":"Aditi P Singh, Erin P Balogh, Robert W Carlson, Mary Margaret Huizinga, Bradley A Malin, Alexander Melamed, Neal J Meropol, Etta D Pisano, Robert A Winn, K Robin Yabroff, Lawrence N Shulman","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic health records (EHRs) are a significant advancement over paper records. However, the full potential of EHRs for improving care quality, patient outcomes, surveillance, and research in cancer care is yet to be realized. The organic evolution of EHRs has resulted in a number of unanticipated consequences including increased time spent by clinicians interfacing with the EHR for daily workflows. Patient access to clinicians and their records has been an important advancement in patient-centered care; however, this has brought to light additional gaps and challenges in EHRs meeting these needs. A significant challenge for EHR design and physician workflows is how best to meet the complex goals and priorities of various stakeholders including providers, researchers, patients, health systems, payors, and regulatory agencies. The National Cancer Policy Forum convened a 2022 workshop, \"Innovations in Electronic Health Records for Oncology Care, Research and Surveillance,\" to address these challenges and to facilitate collaboration across all user groups with the goal of re-envisioning EHRs that will better support shared goals of improving patient outcomes and advancing cancer care and research without overburdening clinicians with administrative tasks. Here, we summarize the current EHR ecosystem as discussed at the workshop and highlight opportunities to improve EHR contributions to oncology evidence and care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-Envisioning Electronic Health Records to Optimize Patient-Centered Cancer Care, Quality, Surveillance, and Research.\",\"authors\":\"Aditi P Singh, Erin P Balogh, Robert W Carlson, Mary Margaret Huizinga, Bradley A Malin, Alexander Melamed, Neal J Meropol, Etta D Pisano, Robert A Winn, K Robin Yabroff, Lawrence N Shulman\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP.24.00260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Electronic health records (EHRs) are a significant advancement over paper records. However, the full potential of EHRs for improving care quality, patient outcomes, surveillance, and research in cancer care is yet to be realized. The organic evolution of EHRs has resulted in a number of unanticipated consequences including increased time spent by clinicians interfacing with the EHR for daily workflows. Patient access to clinicians and their records has been an important advancement in patient-centered care; however, this has brought to light additional gaps and challenges in EHRs meeting these needs. A significant challenge for EHR design and physician workflows is how best to meet the complex goals and priorities of various stakeholders including providers, researchers, patients, health systems, payors, and regulatory agencies. The National Cancer Policy Forum convened a 2022 workshop, \\\"Innovations in Electronic Health Records for Oncology Care, Research and Surveillance,\\\" to address these challenges and to facilitate collaboration across all user groups with the goal of re-envisioning EHRs that will better support shared goals of improving patient outcomes and advancing cancer care and research without overburdening clinicians with administrative tasks. Here, we summarize the current EHR ecosystem as discussed at the workshop and highlight opportunities to improve EHR contributions to oncology evidence and care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00260\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与纸质记录相比,电子健康记录(EHR)是一项重大进步。然而,电子病历在提高癌症护理质量、改善患者预后、监测和研究方面的潜力仍有待充分发挥。电子病历的有机发展带来了许多意想不到的后果,包括临床医生在日常工作流程中与电子病历交互所花费的时间增加。病人接触临床医生及其记录是以病人为中心的护理的重要进步;然而,这也揭示了电子病历在满足这些需求方面的更多差距和挑战。电子病历设计和医生工作流程面临的一个重大挑战是如何最好地满足包括医疗服务提供者、研究人员、患者、医疗系统、付款人和监管机构在内的各利益相关方的复杂目标和优先事项。美国国家癌症政策论坛于 2022 年召开了题为 "用于肿瘤治疗、研究和监测的电子病历创新 "的研讨会,以应对这些挑战并促进所有用户群体之间的合作,目的是重新规划电子病历,从而更好地支持改善患者预后、推进癌症治疗和研究的共同目标,同时又不给临床医生带来过重的行政工作负担。在此,我们总结了研讨会上讨论的当前电子病历生态系统,并强调了改善电子病历对肿瘤证据和护理的贡献的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re-Envisioning Electronic Health Records to Optimize Patient-Centered Cancer Care, Quality, Surveillance, and Research.

Electronic health records (EHRs) are a significant advancement over paper records. However, the full potential of EHRs for improving care quality, patient outcomes, surveillance, and research in cancer care is yet to be realized. The organic evolution of EHRs has resulted in a number of unanticipated consequences including increased time spent by clinicians interfacing with the EHR for daily workflows. Patient access to clinicians and their records has been an important advancement in patient-centered care; however, this has brought to light additional gaps and challenges in EHRs meeting these needs. A significant challenge for EHR design and physician workflows is how best to meet the complex goals and priorities of various stakeholders including providers, researchers, patients, health systems, payors, and regulatory agencies. The National Cancer Policy Forum convened a 2022 workshop, "Innovations in Electronic Health Records for Oncology Care, Research and Surveillance," to address these challenges and to facilitate collaboration across all user groups with the goal of re-envisioning EHRs that will better support shared goals of improving patient outcomes and advancing cancer care and research without overburdening clinicians with administrative tasks. Here, we summarize the current EHR ecosystem as discussed at the workshop and highlight opportunities to improve EHR contributions to oncology evidence and care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Why We Should, and How We Can, Reduce the Climate Toxicity of Cancer Care. Willingness of Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer to Participate in Prevention Trials. Telephone Survey-Reported Perceptions of Telehealth Visits Among Black and Non-Black Patients Diagnosed With Cancer. Effect of Prednisone Dosing on Mineralocorticoid-Related Side Effects With Abiraterone in Prostate Cancer. Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Is NOT a Last Resort: Rationale for Early Surgical Referral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1