{"title":"急性胆源性胰腺炎合并胆总管结石患者 MRCP 阴性诊断的风险因素。","authors":"Si-Hai Chen, Wen-Qing Wang, Xiao Fei, Yin Zhu, Xu Shu, Chen Yu, Qian Liao, Hui-Fang Xiong","doi":"10.1097/MPA.0000000000002395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of the presence of choledocholithiasis is crucial among acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are widely used to identify the gallstones of common bile duct (CBD). EUS provides better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity than MRCP but carries a certain risk due to sedation. We investigated the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis for better selection of MRCP or EUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2321 ABP patients were retrospectively included in this study. Based on the exclusion criteria, 337 ABP patients with negative MRCP results were ultimately included. Among these patients, 75 patients had positive EUS findings. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to screen the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with positive EUS findings were older (62.0 vs. 55.0) and had higher rate of cholecystectomy history (18.7% vs. 7.3%) than those with negative EUS findings. The result of univariate logistic regression showed that the history of cholecystectomy, age and sex were potential risk factors (all p < 0.05). Then after adjusting the other potential risk factors (Direct bilirubin (DBIL), alanine transaminase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)), a history of cholecystectomy (OR = 2.859 [1.312,6.23]), older age (1.03 [1.009,1.052]) and male (2.016 [1.152,3.528]) were independent risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The history of cholecystectomy, older age and male are independently associated with an increased risk of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis. We suggest that patients with these risk factors should undergo EUS first, rather than MRCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in acute biliary pancreatitis patients with choledocholithiasis.\",\"authors\":\"Si-Hai Chen, Wen-Qing Wang, Xiao Fei, Yin Zhu, Xu Shu, Chen Yu, Qian Liao, Hui-Fang Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MPA.0000000000002395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of the presence of choledocholithiasis is crucial among acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are widely used to identify the gallstones of common bile duct (CBD). EUS provides better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity than MRCP but carries a certain risk due to sedation. We investigated the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis for better selection of MRCP or EUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2321 ABP patients were retrospectively included in this study. Based on the exclusion criteria, 337 ABP patients with negative MRCP results were ultimately included. Among these patients, 75 patients had positive EUS findings. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to screen the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with positive EUS findings were older (62.0 vs. 55.0) and had higher rate of cholecystectomy history (18.7% vs. 7.3%) than those with negative EUS findings. The result of univariate logistic regression showed that the history of cholecystectomy, age and sex were potential risk factors (all p < 0.05). Then after adjusting the other potential risk factors (Direct bilirubin (DBIL), alanine transaminase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)), a history of cholecystectomy (OR = 2.859 [1.312,6.23]), older age (1.03 [1.009,1.052]) and male (2.016 [1.152,3.528]) were independent risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The history of cholecystectomy, older age and male are independently associated with an increased risk of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis. We suggest that patients with these risk factors should undergo EUS first, rather than MRCP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002395\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002395","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in acute biliary pancreatitis patients with choledocholithiasis.
Background: Assessment of the presence of choledocholithiasis is crucial among acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are widely used to identify the gallstones of common bile duct (CBD). EUS provides better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity than MRCP but carries a certain risk due to sedation. We investigated the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis for better selection of MRCP or EUS.
Methods: A total of 2321 ABP patients were retrospectively included in this study. Based on the exclusion criteria, 337 ABP patients with negative MRCP results were ultimately included. Among these patients, 75 patients had positive EUS findings. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to screen the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis.
Results: Patients with positive EUS findings were older (62.0 vs. 55.0) and had higher rate of cholecystectomy history (18.7% vs. 7.3%) than those with negative EUS findings. The result of univariate logistic regression showed that the history of cholecystectomy, age and sex were potential risk factors (all p < 0.05). Then after adjusting the other potential risk factors (Direct bilirubin (DBIL), alanine transaminase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)), a history of cholecystectomy (OR = 2.859 [1.312,6.23]), older age (1.03 [1.009,1.052]) and male (2.016 [1.152,3.528]) were independent risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis.
Conclusions: The history of cholecystectomy, older age and male are independently associated with an increased risk of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis. We suggest that patients with these risk factors should undergo EUS first, rather than MRCP.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.