使用活体供体移植物进行肝脏再移植:治疗慢性异体移植失败的可行方法

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000005164
Kosuke Tanaka, Takashi Ito, Yoichiro Uchida, Yuki Masano, Shinya Okumura, Masaaki Hirata, Shoichi Kageyama, Takayuki Anazawa, Yukinori Koyama, Satoshi Ogiso, Takamichi Ishii, Kazuyuki Nagai, Etsuro Hatano
{"title":"使用活体供体移植物进行肝脏再移植:治疗慢性异体移植失败的可行方法","authors":"Kosuke Tanaka, Takashi Ito, Yoichiro Uchida, Yuki Masano, Shinya Okumura, Masaaki Hirata, Shoichi Kageyama, Takayuki Anazawa, Yukinori Koyama, Satoshi Ogiso, Takamichi Ishii, Kazuyuki Nagai, Etsuro Hatano","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The indication of living donor liver retransplantation (re-LDLT) for retransplant candidates with chronic allograft failure (CAF) is increasing because of the high mortality rate of patients on the waiting list. However, evidence supporting re-LDLT for CAF remains scarce because of technical difficulties. We aimed to examine the feasibility based on our significant case experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 95 retransplant cases (adult: 53, pediatric: 42) between 2000 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Graft survival after re-LDLT and deceased donor liver retransplantation (re-DDLT) was compared among recipients with CAF and acute allograft failure (AAF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Re-LDLTs for CAF were performed in 58 (61.1%) cases, re-DDLTs for CAF in 16 (16.8%) cases, re-LDLTs for AAF in 13 (13.7%) cases, and re-DDLTs for AAF in 8 (8.4%) cases. Re-DDLTs have become increasingly prevalent over time. Retransplantation for AAF results in lower graft survival than that for CAF in both adult and pediatric cases. All adult recipients who underwent re-LDLT for AAF died within 1 y after retransplantation. The 5-y graft survival between re-LDLT and re-DDLT for CAF was not significantly different (73.8% versus 75.0%, P  = 0.84). Operation time and blood loss were not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The survival rate of re-LDLT for recipients with CAF is permissible. Re-LDLT may be another treatment option for recipients with CAF.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"174-185"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liver Retransplantation Using Living Donor Grafts: A Feasible Approach for Chronic Allograft Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Kosuke Tanaka, Takashi Ito, Yoichiro Uchida, Yuki Masano, Shinya Okumura, Masaaki Hirata, Shoichi Kageyama, Takayuki Anazawa, Yukinori Koyama, Satoshi Ogiso, Takamichi Ishii, Kazuyuki Nagai, Etsuro Hatano\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TP.0000000000005164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The indication of living donor liver retransplantation (re-LDLT) for retransplant candidates with chronic allograft failure (CAF) is increasing because of the high mortality rate of patients on the waiting list. However, evidence supporting re-LDLT for CAF remains scarce because of technical difficulties. We aimed to examine the feasibility based on our significant case experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 95 retransplant cases (adult: 53, pediatric: 42) between 2000 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Graft survival after re-LDLT and deceased donor liver retransplantation (re-DDLT) was compared among recipients with CAF and acute allograft failure (AAF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Re-LDLTs for CAF were performed in 58 (61.1%) cases, re-DDLTs for CAF in 16 (16.8%) cases, re-LDLTs for AAF in 13 (13.7%) cases, and re-DDLTs for AAF in 8 (8.4%) cases. Re-DDLTs have become increasingly prevalent over time. Retransplantation for AAF results in lower graft survival than that for CAF in both adult and pediatric cases. All adult recipients who underwent re-LDLT for AAF died within 1 y after retransplantation. The 5-y graft survival between re-LDLT and re-DDLT for CAF was not significantly different (73.8% versus 75.0%, P  = 0.84). Operation time and blood loss were not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The survival rate of re-LDLT for recipients with CAF is permissible. Re-LDLT may be another treatment option for recipients with CAF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"174-185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005164\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于等待名单上患者的死亡率较高,对慢性异体移植失败(CAF)的再移植候选者进行活体肝脏再移植(re-LDLT)的适应症正在增加。然而,由于技术上的困难,支持再LDLT治疗CAF的证据仍然很少。我们的目的是根据我们的重要病例经验研究其可行性:我们对 2000 年至 2020 年间的 95 例再移植病例(成人 53 例,儿童 42 例)进行了回顾性研究。比较了CAF和急性同种异体移植失败(AAF)受者再LDLT和死亡供体肝脏再移植(re-DDLT)后的移植物存活率:结果:58例(61.1%)因CAF进行了再LDLT,16例(16.8%)因CAF进行了再DDLT,13例(13.7%)因AAF进行了再LDLT,8例(8.4%)因AAF进行了再DDLT。随着时间的推移,DDLT 再移植越来越普遍。在成人和儿童病例中,AAF再移植的移植物存活率均低于CAF。所有因 AAF 而接受再 LDLT 的成人受者均在再移植后 1 年内死亡。CAF的再LDLT和再DDLT的5年移植物存活率没有显著差异(73.8%对75.0%,P = 0.84)。手术时间和失血量无明显差异:结论:CAF受者再LDLT的存活率是允许的。结论:CAF受者的再LDLT存活率是允许的,再LDLT可能是CAF受者的另一种治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Liver Retransplantation Using Living Donor Grafts: A Feasible Approach for Chronic Allograft Failure.

Background: The indication of living donor liver retransplantation (re-LDLT) for retransplant candidates with chronic allograft failure (CAF) is increasing because of the high mortality rate of patients on the waiting list. However, evidence supporting re-LDLT for CAF remains scarce because of technical difficulties. We aimed to examine the feasibility based on our significant case experience.

Methods: A total of 95 retransplant cases (adult: 53, pediatric: 42) between 2000 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Graft survival after re-LDLT and deceased donor liver retransplantation (re-DDLT) was compared among recipients with CAF and acute allograft failure (AAF).

Results: Re-LDLTs for CAF were performed in 58 (61.1%) cases, re-DDLTs for CAF in 16 (16.8%) cases, re-LDLTs for AAF in 13 (13.7%) cases, and re-DDLTs for AAF in 8 (8.4%) cases. Re-DDLTs have become increasingly prevalent over time. Retransplantation for AAF results in lower graft survival than that for CAF in both adult and pediatric cases. All adult recipients who underwent re-LDLT for AAF died within 1 y after retransplantation. The 5-y graft survival between re-LDLT and re-DDLT for CAF was not significantly different (73.8% versus 75.0%, P  = 0.84). Operation time and blood loss were not significantly different.

Conclusions: The survival rate of re-LDLT for recipients with CAF is permissible. Re-LDLT may be another treatment option for recipients with CAF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation
Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.30%
发文量
1906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year. Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed. The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation. ​
期刊最新文献
As Good as it Gets. Using National Databases to Identify Opportunities in Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion. Safety and Feasibility of Early Extubation in Liver Transplantation: Experience in 1555 Patients. Impact of HLA Epitope Matching on Outcomes in Haploidentical HSCT With Distinct GVHD Prophylaxes. All Cloak and No Dagger? Immunosuppression-free Lung Transplantation by Sustained Knockdown of Major Histocompatibility Complex Expression in the Graft. Metabolic Flexibility Predicts Response to Saroglitazar in Liver Transplant Recipients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1