机器人辅助胸腔镜手术治疗儿童肺动脉栓塞的疗效。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS World Journal of Pediatric Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/wjps-2023-000748
Liang Liang, Zheng Tan, Ting Huang, Yue Gao, Jian Zhang, Jiangen Yu, Jie Xia, Qiang Shu
{"title":"机器人辅助胸腔镜手术治疗儿童肺动脉栓塞的疗效。","authors":"Liang Liang, Zheng Tan, Ting Huang, Yue Gao, Jian Zhang, Jiangen Yu, Jie Xia, Qiang Shu","doi":"10.1136/wjps-2023-000748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) in the treatment of pulmonary sequestration (PS) in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and RAST performed on patients with PS at a single center from May 2019 to July 2023 were identified. The <i>χ</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the perioperative outcomes between VATS and RATS groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three patients underwent RATS while 77 patients underwent VATS. In both two groups, one patient converted to thoracotomy and no surgical mortality case. The median operation time was longer for the RATS group compared with the VATS group (75 min <i>vs.</i> 60 min, <i>p</i> <0.001). A lower ratio of chest tube indwelling (61.3% <i>vs.</i> 90.9%, <i>p</i> <0.001), fewer drainage days (1.0 day <i>vs.</i> 2.0 days, <i>p</i> <0.001), and a shorter postoperative length of stay (5.0 days <i>vs.</i> 6.0 days, <i>p</i> <0.001) were found in the RATS group than that in the VATS group. No significant difference was found in the incidence of short-term postoperative complications (hydrothorax and pneumothorax) between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RATS was safe and effective in children with PS over 6 months old and more than 7 kg. Furthermore, RATS led to better short-time postoperative outcome than VATS. Multi-institutional studies are warranted to compare differences in long-term outcomes between RATS and VATS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23823,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11298719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of pulmonary sequestration in children.\",\"authors\":\"Liang Liang, Zheng Tan, Ting Huang, Yue Gao, Jian Zhang, Jiangen Yu, Jie Xia, Qiang Shu\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/wjps-2023-000748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) in the treatment of pulmonary sequestration (PS) in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and RAST performed on patients with PS at a single center from May 2019 to July 2023 were identified. The <i>χ</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the perioperative outcomes between VATS and RATS groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three patients underwent RATS while 77 patients underwent VATS. In both two groups, one patient converted to thoracotomy and no surgical mortality case. The median operation time was longer for the RATS group compared with the VATS group (75 min <i>vs.</i> 60 min, <i>p</i> <0.001). A lower ratio of chest tube indwelling (61.3% <i>vs.</i> 90.9%, <i>p</i> <0.001), fewer drainage days (1.0 day <i>vs.</i> 2.0 days, <i>p</i> <0.001), and a shorter postoperative length of stay (5.0 days <i>vs.</i> 6.0 days, <i>p</i> <0.001) were found in the RATS group than that in the VATS group. No significant difference was found in the incidence of short-term postoperative complications (hydrothorax and pneumothorax) between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RATS was safe and effective in children with PS over 6 months old and more than 7 kg. Furthermore, RATS led to better short-time postoperative outcome than VATS. Multi-institutional studies are warranted to compare differences in long-term outcomes between RATS and VATS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11298719/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2023-000748\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2023-000748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)治疗儿童肺动脉栓塞(PS)的疗效:方法:对2019年5月至2023年7月在一个中心对PS患者实施的所有视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)和RAST进行鉴定。采用χ 2检验和Wilcoxon检验比较VATS组和RATS组的围手术期结果:93名患者接受了RATS手术,77名患者接受了VATS手术。两组中均有一名患者转为开胸手术,无手术死亡病例。与 VATS 组相比,RATS 组的中位手术时间更长(75 分钟 vs. 60 分钟,p vs. 90.9%,p vs. 2.0 天,p vs. 6.0 天,p 结论:对于 6 个月以上、体重超过 7 公斤的 PS 患儿,RATS 是安全有效的。此外,与 VATS 相比,RATS 术后短期疗效更好。有必要进行多机构研究,以比较 RATS 和 VATS 在长期疗效上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of pulmonary sequestration in children.

Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) in the treatment of pulmonary sequestration (PS) in children.

Methods: All video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and RAST performed on patients with PS at a single center from May 2019 to July 2023 were identified. The χ 2 and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the perioperative outcomes between VATS and RATS groups.

Results: Ninety-three patients underwent RATS while 77 patients underwent VATS. In both two groups, one patient converted to thoracotomy and no surgical mortality case. The median operation time was longer for the RATS group compared with the VATS group (75 min vs. 60 min, p <0.001). A lower ratio of chest tube indwelling (61.3% vs. 90.9%, p <0.001), fewer drainage days (1.0 day vs. 2.0 days, p <0.001), and a shorter postoperative length of stay (5.0 days vs. 6.0 days, p <0.001) were found in the RATS group than that in the VATS group. No significant difference was found in the incidence of short-term postoperative complications (hydrothorax and pneumothorax) between two groups.

Conclusions: RATS was safe and effective in children with PS over 6 months old and more than 7 kg. Furthermore, RATS led to better short-time postoperative outcome than VATS. Multi-institutional studies are warranted to compare differences in long-term outcomes between RATS and VATS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hirschsprung disease: common and uncommon variants. Role of genetics and the environment in the etiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Surgical management of the diaphragmatic defect in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a contemporary review. Lung-protective ventilation in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of pulmonary sequestration in children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1